Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-08-2016, 06:34 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 361
Thanks: 275
Thanked 132 Times in 102 Posts
I'm still running my 2003 in the mud and muck every hunting season. Hasn't stranded me yet, although I ain't braggin' about my mileage with the mudgrips and all.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-08-2016, 06:57 PM   #12 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
My little brother has a '91 Wrangler with 200k miles, all original. He has beaten the thing to hell and back, and it's still going trouble free. He has bent the leaf Springs, smashed the oil pan by 1qt, smashed the exhaust (multiple times). It's amazing, but it STILL GOES! And it's an absolute blast to ride in! I love Jeeps <3.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2016, 01:20 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
adam728's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 161

Mazda3 - '08 Mazda 3 S
90 day: 29.65 mpg (US)

DR650SE - '13 Suzuki DR650SE
90 day: 46.16 mpg (US)

Wife's - '12 GMC Terrain SLE-2
Thanks: 2
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
The Jeepster concept would be more aero



But as said, why change it? They sell a ton, resale is up there with Tacomas (inexplicably high), and they are generally very dependable. I liked mine, it just didn't work well with a budding family.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to adam728 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-11-2016)
Old 05-11-2016, 01:38 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,515
Thanks: 8,069
Thanked 8,867 Times in 7,319 Posts
Could it do this?


http://auto.howstuffworks.com/jeep-hurricane2.htm
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-11-2016)
Old 05-11-2016, 01:44 AM   #15 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 829
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
On purpose?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
Ecky (05-11-2016)
Old 05-11-2016, 03:32 PM   #16 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
Looks to me like the 4 wheel steering control algorithms could use a bit of tweaking. Or maybe they want to brag about a 4 second zero-sixty time while leaving "RPM" out of the statement.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2016, 10:25 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,515
Thanks: 8,069
Thanked 8,867 Times in 7,319 Posts
The howstuffworks link is explicative.

It's how the kids are doing donuts these days.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2016, 01:58 AM   #18 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,683 Times in 1,501 Posts
Though aerodynamics are the least concern of a Wrangler buyer, moving the engine a few inches back in order to get some clearance for a more aerodynamic front clip would also lead to another benefit as it would improve stability due to the weight bias better distributed between the axles.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2016, 11:02 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
adam728's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 161

Mazda3 - '08 Mazda 3 S
90 day: 29.65 mpg (US)

DR650SE - '13 Suzuki DR650SE
90 day: 46.16 mpg (US)

Wife's - '12 GMC Terrain SLE-2
Thanks: 2
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
...moving the engine a few inches back... would also lead to another benefit as it would improve stability due to the weight bias better distributed between the axles.
Better? The current Wranglers are basically a 50/50 weight distribution.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2016, 12:20 AM   #20 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Wrangler, template. Template, Wrangler.



And that's about as far as this conversation's going to get.

I used to work at a Jeep dealer. I absosmurfly loathe Jeep people. The Jeep (Wrangler, not some rebadged other for mass sales) is the absolute best vehicle for its purpose, which no one at all has any real need to have performed.

__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
Xist (05-14-2016)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com