05-01-2012, 05:34 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
Hydrogen > EV
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100
should have explained - heat is lost to surface area, power is made by PSI pushing on the piston times the length it effectively moves (stroke, sort of).
so, there is a square/cube thing going on - for a given CC, the fewer pistons you have, the less surface area you have for heat to be lost to.
air gets in and out of the combustion area through valves, which are effectively limited by the circumference of the valves, times the number of valves, with bonus for more lift and longer lift. too long of lift, and you lose economy.
|
I was going to chime in and say I'd like a boxer style 8 cylinder. I think it wold be pretty cool.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-01-2012, 07:25 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
EtOH
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r
Old Mechanic, how about flat-4 engines? I know Subaru doesn't use balance shafts, and the EJ25s are pretty rev friendly I believe (although that may be because they have a somewhat short stroke).
|
The thing about the EJ25 is that a stock crank will physically destroy itself past 8k RPM. I don't know if it's just the huge bores or the firing order. But it's for that reason I don't believe the flat four is any more smoother than a straight 4. The EJ25 is the one with the problem though since the JDM EJ20 will rev to 8k no problem.
As for big 4 bangers, one of the old Mercedes racing engines was huge compared to today's 4 bangers. 5.9L Mercedes 35hp
__________________
-Allch Chcar
|
|
|
05-01-2012, 10:53 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allch Chcar
But it's for that reason I don't believe the flat four is any more smoother than a straight 4.
|
Flat 4 is naturally balanced (like an inline 6) whereas a inline 4 is not.
|
|
|
05-02-2012, 01:45 AM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
A flat 2 is also just as balanced as a flat 4 or flat 6. Any combination of multiple of 2 cyls at a 180 degree Vee is inherently balanced.
|
|
|
05-02-2012, 11:56 AM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
A flat 2 is also just as balanced as a flat 4 or flat 6. Any combination of multiple of 2 cyls at a 180 degree Vee is inherently balanced.
|
that is why harley motors don't vibrate at all and can turn such high rpm's......
oh. wait......
(that was sarcasm folks - harley's vibrate like a housewife's spin cycle and have a VERY low upper RPM limit....)
|
|
|
05-02-2012, 12:37 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
A flat 2 is also just as balanced as a flat 4 or flat 6. Any combination of multiple of 2 cyls at a 180 degree Vee is inherently balanced.
|
that is why harley motors don't vibrate at all and can turn such high rpm's......
oh. wait......
(that was sarcasm folks - harley's vibrate like a housewife's spin cycle and have a VERY low upper RPM limit....)
|
I think you're having trouble figuring out the difference between a 45 degree Harley Davidson engine and a smooth 180 degree flat twin such as BMW. Let me help you with that.
Harley
BMW boxes 2 cyl
Last edited by tjts1; 05-02-2012 at 12:43 PM..
|
|
|
05-02-2012, 02:29 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltArc
I was going to chime in and say I'd like a boxer style 8 cylinder. I think it wold be pretty cool.
|
How about a 1.5 liter one?
Porsche 804 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was also made in two-liter and 2.2 liter forms.
-soD
|
|
|
05-02-2012, 04:56 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
I've been on both cycles. I love the BMW, smoothest twin on the planet. I hate the Harley, roughest twin on the planet. I'd rather ride a single cylinder. The person who thought a V twin with odd firing to share the crank throw is certainly roasting down somewhere in the planet's core.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
05-02-2012, 10:55 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 71
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
So, the ultimate in ICE fuel efficiency would be a single. You could start with an end combustion chamber off the head from a Chevy 5.3 liter LS truck engine, a stroke of about 4.5 inches would give you 50 cubic inches, about right to power a light car. You'd probably want counterrotating balance shafts.
|
|
|
05-03-2012, 04:26 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 830
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
I think you're having trouble figuring out the difference between a 45 degree Harley Davidson engine and a smooth 180 degree flat twin such as BMW. Let me help you with that.
Harley
BMW boxes 2 cyl
|
yup, the harley sound is the result of perhaps the worst possible 2 cylinder layout in existence. the bmw boxer is perfectly balanced, but, sounds crappy to my ear. there is another layout, the 90 degree V twin used by various sport bike makers such as ducati. IMO, this layout, in addition to being balanced is my favorite engine soundtrack, followed closely by a 90 degree v-8 and the inline 6 which probably is the perfect engine layout, if there is such a thing.
|
|
|
|