Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-21-2014, 02:41 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: fremont,california,usa
Posts: 33

baby beluga - '90 toyota camry dx wagon
90 day: 29.21 mpg (US)

red1 - '97 Matsuda Miata
90 day: 31.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Unhappy 3 options to resolve mpg drop after front air dam install?

I installed a front lawn edge airdam on 4/10.

You can see that for fill-ups after 4/6 in my fuel log graph that I lost 1-2mpg since that time. I could feel more air resistance too.

1990 toyota camry dx wagon Gas Mileage (baby beluga) - EcoModder.com

So which of these resolutions would you recommend?
  1. remove the airdam completely
  2. cut out part of the airdam that's in the middle; leave the parts in front of the tires
  3. leave the whole thing on and add a belly pan right behind it

I notice that the Volt, hybrid cars and Tesla/nissan gt-r all handle airflow, airdams, differently...

Volt has a low-hanging easily scratched up tuner-ish airdam "lip" all the way around.
Hybrids and Bimmers have air blocking flaps only in front of the tires to reduce air drag on tires. Tesla/GT-R/Jetta TDI have full belly pans.

My dam looks nice but i'll chuck it if it's not helping. So far it's not helping. I'm ALSO sad that my mpg increase from various mods is only helping me 8% or so vs a lot of 30-40+% increases in MPG I see from many other people here... not sure what I'm doing wrong. Will check tire pressure again tomorrow...

Wondering what to do... I recall some people complaining of similar air dam mpg reductions on their small cars or big trucks.

Thanks for any advice!

__________________
Sorry, new users are not permitted to post links in their signatures.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-21-2014, 05:43 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
How about remove it and add belly pan? Proven method used by OEMs, seems to work. Even if you leave the part sitting in front of the tires, it might be too far forward to block air.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
beluga (06-26-2014), UltArc (06-21-2014)
Old 06-21-2014, 07:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,015

Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix
90 day: 26.7 mpg (US)

SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
Have you installed some type of instant FE gauge yet. I think that most people here will agree that the vast majority of their FE increase comes from driving style. May have missed it but a picture of your air might be helpful for comments. If you believe its not working modify or remove it. Tank to tank testing is not the best method. For me it wouldn't even be close, were I drive and conditions vary too much.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2014, 07:53 AM   #4 (permalink)
The Dirty330 Modder
 
Gealii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North East Ohio, USA
Posts: 642

CruzeRS - '15 Chevy Cruze LT RS
90 day: 41.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 67 Times in 59 Posts
We need pics
__________________



"The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing."
- Henry Ford
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2014, 08:56 AM   #5 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,937

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
SUV
90 day: 51.62 mpg (US)

Tycho the Truck - '91 Toyota Pickup DLX 4WD
90 day: 22.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,802 Times in 939 Posts
Here's what I see: you only have 5 fills listed since installing the air dam. One of these you admitted to driving at higher speeds, and another you couldn't get accurate mileage because of the pump. I think you're jumping the gun on declaring the air dam a culprit in lowering your economy. Give it a few months; unless you're doing controlled testing, it's very hard to ascertain the effects of one modification except over a long period of results.
__________________
UIUC Aerospace Engineering
www.amateuraerodynamics.com
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vman455 For This Useful Post:
beluga (06-26-2014)
Old 06-21-2014, 09:21 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
I think you should do some coastdown testing, airdam on and off.

It could be your airdam is just too low. You're creating more drag than necessary to reduce underbody turbulence.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
beluga (06-26-2014), UltArc (06-21-2014)
Old 06-21-2014, 02:39 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
image

Yes,please.Photograph that little puppy.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
mcrews (06-21-2014)
Old 06-21-2014, 09:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
An air dam makes more air get sucked through the radiator. Have you any grill blocks? Did you see change in coolant temperature?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2014, 10:59 AM   #9 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by niky
I think you should do some coastdown testing, airdam on and off.
Yup! More focused testing would be best.

I'd be very reluctant to declare success/failure of any mod as small as adding a lawn-edging air dam if going by tank-to-tank results.

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ery-11445.html
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2014, 03:30 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: fremont,california,usa
Posts: 33

baby beluga - '90 toyota camry dx wagon
90 day: 29.21 mpg (US)

red1 - '97 Matsuda Miata
90 day: 31.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
thanks everyone for the tips.

there are pics at the bottom of this page. let me know if you need better ones. thank you!

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...n-27935-2.html

__________________
Sorry, new users are not permitted to post links in their signatures.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
air dam, airdam, drag, drag coefficient, drag reduction





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com