Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-22-2014, 03:03 PM   #31 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: In Perpetual Fear
Posts: 13

Nikita - '95 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i'm curious and maybe this is the wrong place to ask but do any of u guys use cruise control to help with your pulse&glide assuming engine on, in gear glide

say set the cruise to 55mph then pulse up to the next car and coast back until the car takes offense and begins to accelerate then pulse again

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-22-2014, 06:11 PM   #32 (permalink)
Liberty Lover
 
j12piprius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: central california
Posts: 587

pris prius - '12 Toyota plug in prius
90 day: 71.09 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 83 Times in 60 Posts
grill block & fan

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
In my experience with this generation of Civic, the radiator fan comes on at 206F. If you're cycling between 205 (or 6) and 195, that's your fan cooling things down. Open up a bit of lower grille to keep it below that mark more of the time. I used to fully open my lower grille every summer.
PaleMelanesian, thanks for that update. The temperature sensor turns on the relay at 185 degrees, and I presume the PCM controls the fan after that; 195 to 205 would be good. My last trip the temperature stayed between 185 and 198, except for the major climbs, with a 70% grill block.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to j12piprius For This Useful Post:
PaleMelanesian (05-23-2014)
Old 05-22-2014, 07:49 PM   #33 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: In Perpetual Fear
Posts: 13

Nikita - '95 Pontiac Firebird Formula
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i was actually suggesting the cruise be set to a minimum speed and you pulse and glide above it
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2014, 11:02 AM   #34 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
The problem with that concept is the in-gear "glide" part. In my tests with the automatic Odyssey, pulse-and-engine-brake is worse than just maintaining steady speed. Pulse and glide needs to have a neutral glide, even better if it's engine off.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2014, 04:09 PM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: France - Paris
Posts: 762

la_voiture_de_courses - '03 Renault Megane Estate
OldContinents
90 day: 44.34 mpg (US)

xiao lan - '01 Audi A2
90 day: 38.88 mpg (US)

Brit iron - '92 Mini Mini
90 day: 45.5 mpg (US)

Prius - '09 Toyota PRIUS Lounge
90 day: 47.37 mpg (US)

Beemer - '06 BMW F800 ST
90 day: 53.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
Some cars switch off injection when decelerating in gear so maybe EOC is not that useful if your top gear allow almost no engine braking at lower speed.
I use that technique on mine wich can't be turned off unless at 0 mph anyway ...
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2014, 10:37 AM   #36 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
We're talking about a car I'm very familiar with. EOC is the best way to get mileage out of these. Neutral engine-on coasting is the next best. In-gear "coasting" will give you heavy engine braking and ruin any chance at mileage.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2014, 11:37 AM   #37 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Somebody here was getting good results with adding the tiniest bit of throttle opening while decelerating, who was that? It was counterintuitive but he was taking advantage of a loophole in the ECU programming.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2014, 02:37 AM   #38 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: France - Paris
Posts: 762

la_voiture_de_courses - '03 Renault Megane Estate
OldContinents
90 day: 44.34 mpg (US)

xiao lan - '01 Audi A2
90 day: 38.88 mpg (US)

Brit iron - '92 Mini Mini
90 day: 45.5 mpg (US)

Prius - '09 Toyota PRIUS Lounge
90 day: 47.37 mpg (US)

Beemer - '06 BMW F800 ST
90 day: 53.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
I tend to use à Pull & Hold technique : launch the car then use as little throttle to keep the engine off lugging
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2014, 10:14 AM   #39 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
This is where you get into the fine details specific to a certain vehicle. I've heard of people doing that, but it's not a useful thing on a Honda.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2014, 01:07 AM   #40 (permalink)
Liberty Lover
 
j12piprius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: central california
Posts: 587

pris prius - '12 Toyota plug in prius
90 day: 71.09 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 83 Times in 60 Posts
bumper shape

60.6 ~
foam sheet, perpendicular to the ground, curving around to the sides;
55.9 ~
old plant pot plastic bumper cover, slanting slightly under, curving around to sides;
55.0 ~
slant back plastic bumper, 3" more forward at the bottom, curving to the wheels.

Based on my highest three trips, a perpendicular bumper shape, no lower than the regular bumper, has resulted in much better mpg than either slant back or slant under. I'm not sure why this is, other than perhaps getting the air to the side of the car as quickly as possible is more important than having a sharp angle that directs it over the hood. I'm going to experiment with this in a couple of days, which might mean trimming the plastic a bit more.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to j12piprius For This Useful Post:
Fat Charlie (06-06-2014)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com