04-26-2010, 11:42 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
My Goal: 35 MPG All Day
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 684
Thanks: 39
Thanked 36 Times in 25 Posts
|
34MPG in a GIANT truck
IDK how many of you listen to the GoHypermiling Podcast but I listened to a recent but a little bit older one and the guy says he was driving some HUGE truck and he was getting 34 MPG and was saying how crazy it is that he has drove cars 1/5 of the weight and cant get that kind of MPG
My question is, whats up with things like this? How do trucks that can tow 6000 pounds get better MPG than my neon?
This happens in other ways to, like how does my fiancee's kia get 25mpg (epa) on a 1.5 L engine with like 400 less pounds than my car and I get 25mpg (epa) on a bigger engine and heavier car?
And that also makes me think "if the crx got 50mpg, and the prius has a 1/2 electric engine, how come they get about the same mpg, how come toyota couldn't have make the prius get 100 mpg easy? I know with all the electronic crap and "modern conveniences" in new cars weigh it down but why cop out? just make another "FE" prius that DOES get 80/85MPG epa....
I know this is more of a ramble than anything but id like to see anyone's responses on any of the topics or any you think of
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-26-2010, 11:50 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
|
I encountered 30s mpg in a ford six diesel, crew cab, jacked up stiff tread... and that was in 1992...and that freakin thing loved 85 mph.
It is part of my doings today, remembering that truck. If gas engines is going to be a hog no matter what.. something is wrong.
It is my reason for my quest of 3 main boxers..witnessing that truck on a 300 mile journey.
I got nearly 3000 pounds, 92mph contently on a low pressure 1781cc with an AWD. It is my best answer. And ya know... nothing is gonna beat it. Much like a diesel.
That truck was no joke.
|
|
|
04-27-2010, 01:52 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgd73
It is my reason for my quest of 3 main boxers..witnessing that truck on a 300 mile journey.
|
|
|
|
04-27-2010, 11:44 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 18603, USA
Posts: 759
Thanks: 221
Thanked 60 Times in 45 Posts
|
The truck was a Ford Super Duty F-250 with a 6.7L Diesel. 34.7 MPG. I'll dig up a direct link from cleanmpg.com for you all later today.
|
|
|
04-27-2010, 01:35 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomFact314
My question is, whats up with things like this? How do trucks that can tow 6000 pounds get better MPG than my neon?
|
Because of special conditions under which the driving was done.
|
|
|
04-27-2010, 02:42 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Wet Coast, Kanuckistan.
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 100
Thanked 306 Times in 178 Posts
|
Quote:
This happens in other ways to, like how does my fiancee's kia get 25mpg (epa) on a 1.5 L engine with like 400 less pounds than my car and I get 25mpg (epa) on a bigger engine and heavier car?
|
Apples and oranges. Each engine, drivetrain, body is different in so many respects that you can't really pin it down to one thing usually.
Quote:
And that also makes me think "if the crx got 50mpg, and the prius has a 1/2 electric engine, how come they get about the same mpg, how come toyota couldn't have make the prius get 100 mpg easy?
|
In this case there are a couple of biggies:
1) The Prius is a lot heavier. CRX ~1900 lbs Prius ~ 2900 lbs. 1000 lbs more.
2) The CRX uses lean burn but the Prius does not. This is because of emissions, I believe. Lean burn produces a lot of nox which, to get SULV status, the Prius can't have.
There are other reasons but those are the biggies.
Quote:
I know with all the electronic crap and "modern conveniences" in new cars weigh it down but why cop out? just make another "FE" prius that DOES get 80/85MPG epa....
|
Like the RS Porsches, all stripped down, only for FE in this case. Seconded!
Having said all that, the Prius is capable of much better FE than EPA as demonstrated by some hypermilers without a PHEV kit. There are even some Japanese hypermilers that regularly get 100+ mpg driving slow using P+G.
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.
"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.
Last edited by orange4boy; 04-27-2010 at 02:47 PM..
|
|
|
04-27-2010, 03:34 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 18603, USA
Posts: 759
Thanks: 221
Thanked 60 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
|
|
04-27-2010, 06:22 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,260
Thanks: 24,387
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
|
huge
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomFact314
IDK how many of you listen to the GoHypermiling Podcast but I listened to a recent but a little bit older one and the guy says he was driving some HUGE truck and he was getting 34 MPG and was saying how crazy it is that he has drove cars 1/5 of the weight and cant get that kind of MPG
My question is, whats up with things like this? How do trucks that can tow 6000 pounds get better MPG than my neon?
This happens in other ways to, like how does my fiancee's kia get 25mpg (epa) on a 1.5 L engine with like 400 less pounds than my car and I get 25mpg (epa) on a bigger engine and heavier car?
And that also makes me think "if the crx got 50mpg, and the prius has a 1/2 electric engine, how come they get about the same mpg, how come toyota couldn't have make the prius get 100 mpg easy? I know with all the electronic crap and "modern conveniences" in new cars weigh it down but why cop out? just make another "FE" prius that DOES get 80/85MPG epa....
I know this is more of a ramble than anything but id like to see anyone's responses on any of the topics or any you think of
|
Random,I don't know if 34-mpg is that big of a deal if they were hypermiling.
When Robert Sikorsky wrote 'How to get More Miles Per Gallon' he described a method of hypermiling in which he could obtain over 200-mpg,and college teams are getting over 7,000-mpg when doing it.
I would presume that during 'normal' driving,his truck returns somewhat less.
|
|
|
04-28-2010, 04:24 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,747
Thanks: 1,325
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomFact314
My question is, whats up with things like this? How do trucks that can tow 6000 pounds get better MPG than my neon?
|
Next to the previous answers, there's also gearing. And if the truck has a diesel then that helps too (20%).
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
|
|
|
04-28-2010, 10:08 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Basjoos Wannabe
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
|
I agree that the gearing and diesel engine likely made the high MPG figure. And who knows, the guy might have been bobtailing or running empty as the case may be.
It seems most cars are geared way too low for good MPG. My last 3 vehicles reved much higher than required in top gear, which begs the question why? Why gear a vehicle to burn more fuel?
I'd love to have the gearing i had in my LeSabre, where 1100 rpm was 50 mph. Now THATS proper gearing.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
|
|
|
|
|