05-08-2012, 12:49 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Azle Texas
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
50mpg truck
You think it's impossible? Think again. A 45-50 mpg truck would be great. It would be great to retain the possibility of hauling small loads and going about 55-60mph. I think this would be possible by swapping the origonal truck's engine and puting in a smaller 20-40hp gasoline engine. Probably a horizontal briggs v-twin. The truck would be a 1st gen S-10(1982–1993) or a 1st gen ranger(1982–1992). Both of these trucks weigh around 2600lbs with the reg. cab, no a/c, short bed, and the origonal 4cyl. engine. My goal is around 1 ton with smaller engine and weight reduction. What do you guys think?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-08-2012, 01:14 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Too many cars
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York State
Posts: 1,616
Thanks: 1,364
Thanked 817 Times in 486 Posts
|
I'd go with a 3-cyl Metro engine and a Suzuki Samurai transmission. Or find a diesel S-10/Ranger.
__________________
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2006 Honda Insight (parts car)
1988 Honda CRXFi
1994 Geo Metro
|
|
|
05-08-2012, 01:27 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
|
the briggs engine idea is not good, because they have really really bad fuel consumption in terms of pound per hp/hr.
The metro engine is good, any light automotive engine is good.
__________________
2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle
currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
|
|
|
05-08-2012, 02:03 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Welcome to the site!
No offense, but I think you're dreaming if you think that dropping a tiny engine in a truck is going to get you anywhere near 50 mpg. There are cars that achieve that kind of mileage, but they are WAY more aerodynamic than a truck is and also much smaller. I'm not saying its not doable. I am saying that if you do it, it will not resemble what most of us think a truck looks like.
|
|
|
05-08-2012, 02:12 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Put a hitch on a 50 mpg car and pull a truck box trailer when needed; there ya go.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-08-2012, 02:20 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 134
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
|
I had a 2005 4WD ext-cab Chevy Colorado and was able to get ~31 mpg (the records are on this site). It had the 3.5L (5-cyl) engine and 5-speed manual trans. That was with tonneau cover, tires at 40 psi, and a lot of hypermiling. Based on that, I'm guessing a 2WD reg-cab Colorado (or GMC Canyon) with 4-cyl (2.8L) could come very close to 40 mpg. The S-10 should be similar.
Rather than drop an underpowered engine in, probably an easier solution would be to just swap out the rear gears to something very tall and/or a taller-geared transmission.
Ultimately, I agree with Frank Lee above, though. The best solution is to get a good 4-cyl high mpg car and just tow a small utility trailer when needed.
__________________
Daily driver:
|
|
|
05-08-2012, 02:43 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Welcome to ecomodder.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 50mpgtruck
What do you guys think?
|
That it's a wee bit over-optimistic.
Quite a few members here would love to have a 50mpg car, let alone a truck.
Reducing the truck's weight to say 2200 lbs will be a challenge to start with.
What load capacity do you want it to have ?
With only 20-40 HP, it won't be able to carry heavy stuff.
There's a German member on ecomodder with a VW T4 or T5 Transporter van with a TDI engine. He's close to 50mpg.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
05-08-2012, 03:14 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 150
Thanks: 5
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
Put a hitch on a 50 mpg car and pull a truck box trailer when needed; there ya go.
|
Yup...you see things like this while driving every summer day in Europe.
I have a U-Haul trailer hitch on my '02 Golf TDi, and routinely haul 1000+ lbs. I only use the Ford when I need to pull my 24' Pace (weighs 5500 lbs itself). Do yourself a favor and buy a used TDi, then install a hitch and be happy.
__________________
Best tank ever: 72.1 mpg in February 2005, Seattle to S.F.
New personnal best 'all-city' tank June '08 ... 61.9 mpg!
Thanks to 'pulse-n-glide' technique.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Stan For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-08-2012, 11:02 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Windsor ON Canada
Posts: 373
Thanks: 21
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
|
You may acheive your goal but why? Even if you do build it with a small motor and get 50 mpg how much do you want to haul with this "truck", you're better off with a geo metro and a trailer (it will be lighter) than S10 or Ranger. Small engine cars can tow, especially if with a manual trans.
__________________
|
|
|
05-09-2012, 02:41 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
|
I say go for it, with the Geo/Suzuki drive train. Aero mod that thing to oblivion. How about an aero cap and boat tail on struts so they lift up when you need to access the bed? How about skinny LRR tires and alloy wheels with smooth wheel covers? Look at aerohead's Toyota T100 for inspiration.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
|
|
|
|