Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-09-2011, 12:08 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 135

1991 RED Metro 1.0 Auto - '91 Geo Metro Lsi Auto
Team Metro
90 day: 38.28 mpg (US)

1991 3/5 2 door Blue/green - '91 Geo Metro
Last 3: 42.6 mpg (US)
Thanks: 54
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 88FieroGT View Post
the v6 dragged down the EPA mpg.
The EPA ratings are specific to engine + trans combinations available for that vehicle, the numbers and link I posted are for the 4 cylinder 5 speed, which was the BEST combination for that year.

The tech4/ iron duke/ 2.5L engine is an archaic piece of equipment that is more comparable to a farm tractor engine than any of today's automotive motors. They are tough as nails but when it comes to efficiency they leave a lot to be desired (large bore/ short stroke = less efficient combo at low RPMs).

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-09-2011, 03:10 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 52
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It may be an exaggeration I dont know , but it could just be people being in touch with their car and knowing how it should be driven , the ratings are only estimates and with manuals vs automatics greatly vary.

I was making a poor joke when I said the v6 dragged it down , I know a few people who like to average cars gas figures as a whole not separately when comparing cars. Personally I think thats nonsense but thats where the post came from.

Also I agree , I think the 2.8 is also I dislike anything that doesnt have variable valve timing

Last edited by 88FieroGT; 04-09-2011 at 03:19 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 03:33 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
vacationtime247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Crescent City, CA
Posts: 285

The Toylet - '87 Toyota Supra 350 Chevy V8 / 700R4

In-Durrrr-Oh - '09 TMEC Enduro TMEC 200cc Enduro
90 day: 60.9 mpg (US)

Tem-poo - '86 Ford Tempo GL 4 Door 2.0 Liter Diesel 5 Speed
90 day: 47.52 mpg (US)

Ass Tick - '01 Pontiac Pontiac Aztek GT 5 Door

Green Baby Poop Stain - '01 Pontiac Aztek Aztek Base Model

Black Track - '01 Pontiac Aztek GT
Thanks: 17
Thanked 39 Times in 22 Posts
The Quad 4 / Dual Cam 2.4 was a POS! Every one I've unfortunately owned gave me problems. PRAY that your water pump never goes out on one. Why is that? Because it's driven by the timing chain! Not easy to get to or fix once you're in there! The coil housing plastic would crack over time causing a short. Bad design and a nightmare to work on.
VT247

Quote:
Originally Posted by 88FieroGT View Post
and back then they didnt even use the quad 4 which was more efficient and had more power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 03:38 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
vacationtime247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Crescent City, CA
Posts: 285

The Toylet - '87 Toyota Supra 350 Chevy V8 / 700R4

In-Durrrr-Oh - '09 TMEC Enduro TMEC 200cc Enduro
90 day: 60.9 mpg (US)

Tem-poo - '86 Ford Tempo GL 4 Door 2.0 Liter Diesel 5 Speed
90 day: 47.52 mpg (US)

Ass Tick - '01 Pontiac Pontiac Aztek GT 5 Door

Green Baby Poop Stain - '01 Pontiac Aztek Aztek Base Model

Black Track - '01 Pontiac Aztek GT
Thanks: 17
Thanked 39 Times in 22 Posts
Looks like a Kamm back would be a great mod for FE! Much like the del Sol on here.
VT247

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
88FieroGT -

Welcome to EM! Here's a streamline template overlay to chew on :



CarloSW2
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 09:34 AM   #15 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
That isn't quite the correct Fiero body to be using in the template...
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 09:44 AM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: stl
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by vacationtime247 View Post
The Quad 4 / Dual Cam 2.4 was a POS! Every one I've unfortunately owned gave me problems. PRAY that your water pump never goes out on one. Why is that? Because it's driven by the timing chain! Not easy to get to or fix once you're in there! The coil housing plastic would crack over time causing a short. Bad design and a nightmare to work on.
VT247
Lots of engine have water pumps driven by the timing chain, or timing belt. My '01 Civic is like that. Every 100k miles, you change both.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 12:16 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 52
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yah it looks like the early year GT's or the formula
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 12:16 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 52
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
http://www.calgaryfieros.com/memberscars/88ryan1.jpg

this is the fiero I already have , http://www.calgaryfieros.com/memberscars/88ryan1.jpg

this is the hatch I would like Fino
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 12:31 PM   #19 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Thaty rear hatch kit looks good. The wide body that is shown on that car won't add much to frontal area, but the door section needs to be smoothed out, so that may also work for you.

Couple that with low offset front wheels, and you may have a good combo for front wheel skirts.

If you install that hatchand add ducts, build them using louvres, so theY actually do something at speed. The ones illustrated will only disrupt flow in those areas. It's actually best to vent the engine bay directly behind the car, just below the tail of the decklid, so it fills the wake void behind the car.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 02:19 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 52
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I wasnt actually planning on doing the wide bodykit on the fiero , extra cost but you do have a point.... So I just might , but first I will do a little calculating and testing to see how I like the covers proportionally to the body. Compared to what they would look like with the widebody.

Thanks for the idea.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com