Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2010, 03:51 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
95 F250 XL need help.

You will not believe it.

I get 9 mpg no how I drive fast or slow.

Try drive really really slow that pissed off lot drivers in city and cruise 55-60 mph on highway I still get 9.60-9.993 mpg.


Drive like crazy and cruise 70 mph on highway I get 9.23-9.54 mpg.

It have full tune up and install vacuum gauge.

Air tires from 40 to 80 psi that actually improve much but mpg improve 1.


It flatbed

95 F250 XL no ac
351W it was new engine 14,000 miles ago
4.10 in gear ratio
E40D with overdrive
235/85/16 tires Radial wild cat
Plow but I remove plow when no snow.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-02-2010, 09:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wi.
Posts: 75
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Make sure your t-stat is good, a cooler running efi engine will use more gas than a hot (190* temp) running one. What kind of vacuum is the engine making at idle & is the needle steady? Check fuel pressure & make sure it holds pressure w/ the engine off. Are you using a block heater for quicker warm ups?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 03:05 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
vacuum is 21 psi. But it like stay 10-15 psi when drive highway 55-65 mph.



block heater it didn't came with. Does that will improve mpg how much? Saw auto zone sell for $31 that go in radiator hose.

Will try change t-stat it better be improve mpg or I wouldn't be happy.


For fuel pressure it too much work why there are manifold block that. 1/2" room.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 04:25 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 389

2003 Ninja EX250 - '03 Kawasaki Ninja EX250
90 day: 78.57 mpg (US)

Saturn - '99 Saturn SL1 Base
90 day: 47.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 58 Times in 37 Posts
You are probably running a bit rich, and your 4.10 gears don't help too much either..... whats the weight of that truck?
__________________
Doing my part to reduce dependence on OIL
Doing my part to reduce congestion
And enjoying it!

If you have to use your brakes, you are driving too fast!

My 101.5 MPG 2003 Kawasaki Ninja 250




Crude Oil Price Today
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 10:18 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
6,100 pounds
How I know if it run rich I can't smell anything.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 11:03 AM   #6 (permalink)
ECO-Evolution
 
Lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482

Iron Horse (retired) - '97 Iron horse Intrepid

Ninja - '08 Kawasaki 250R
90 day: 76.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 45 Times in 34 Posts
Is this a daily driver or work truck?
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 11:18 AM   #7 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
I suspect work truck (note mention of plowing).

Here we have what I think is an illustration of the problem of talking in terms of "MPG", particularly for thirsty vehicles. Small MPG differences mask what are actually large percent differences.

He seems discouraged always getting "around 9 mpg", then cites a best of 9.993 mpg when trying, and 9.23 mpg when not trying. That less than 1 mpg difference (0.76 mpg) equals an 8.2% improvement in fuel economy. 8.2% is big!

Assuming 20,000 miles per year and $3 gasoline:

$6004 @ 9.23 mpg
$6501 @ 9.993 mpg

$500 bucks a year is worth trying for in my books.

I'd suggest getting a ScanGauge and trying hard, all the time in terms of driving technique. Then search the list of mods - applying what's suitable for a work truck will be gravy on top of the savings from driving technique.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
Christ (02-03-2010), Daox (02-03-2010)
Old 02-03-2010, 11:36 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
It was used to be landscape truck. I bought and use for plow snow and daily drive.

I don't leave plow on truck it weight 1,000 pound so I don't want wear out front end so I unhook when we have no snow.

If I leave plow I get 7-8 mpg.


Well if I have money I would swap 4.10 to 3.55 but need wait in summer for warm weather.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 12:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
3.55 or even a 3.73 would help tremendously.

Are your tires up to the factory spec (or higher, if you're comfortable with it.) I believe it's 35 front and 41 rear cold pressure for the LT tires you should have on there, but it could be different from my memory (Wouldn't surprise me).

You should also have LT tires on there. If you've got P-type tires, they're probably overloaded and performing poorly.

If the plow frame is attached to the front, make sure you don't still have the big-honkin' lights and such that come with it still attached. Those will cost you some funny vortices that could upset anything close to clean flow that you might have had initially.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 02:43 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
front tires is 65 psi because I try 45 psi it kind squast when you lift plow.

rear tires is 80 psi.

tires is 235/85/16 raidal wildcat. Not sure if it lt or P how I find out?



It not old style plow that mount behind bumper.

This picture of truck now.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
95 Civic EX - Too much power abshnasko EcoModding Central 16 03-01-2011 12:19 PM
95 Saturn Strange VSS Readings past 50 mph junker OpenGauge / MPGuino FE computer 2 02-25-2009 07:29 PM
Boosting Fuel Economy of '95 Chevy Pickup Spiffytexan EcoModding Central 12 07-01-2008 12:47 PM
95 metro parts combatable with 94? Pillzilla DIY / How-to 2 05-05-2008 11:59 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com