Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-20-2020, 12:25 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Add electric motor to extend range?

So, I've been thinking about adding a small LiPo battery in my trunk, and add one or two motors to the rear wheels.

DC Brushless motors would be easiest, but are (due to their low wattage ratings) out of the question.
Two of those electric bicycle hubs of 1500W can actually propel a car to about 25-30MPH, but can usually not surpass more than 45-50MPH before the motor craps out. Meaning highway driving (even on gasoline only), is not good for them.

So AC motors is the next best thing.

Most AC motors sold online, run up to about 4k RPM.
Most car wheels rotate up to about 1500RPM (at about 105-110MPH).
That means if the motor can be paired directly to a 3:1 reduction gear (be it either sprockets and a chain, or better yet, a mini gearbox), their rated torque figures could triple. Making it possible for them to actually be useful.

I've looked around, and the cheapest variable speed AC motor options available, are those from a washing machine; and not much worse compared to an industrial motor.
China actually sells these $2-3k 4 person mini vans with 1 of these motors, allowing the van to accelerate to 30MPH just fine.

I'm not trying to make a tesla here...

These motors have a peak HP rating of about 5HP, and I can presume (from the performance seen) to have about 5LB FT of Torque.
With the 3:1 reduction gear, that results in 10-15 LB FT of torque added.
Use 2 of them (one for the left rear, one for the right rear wheel), and that's around 20LB FT of torque (there are losses with reduction gears, and the motor running at higher RPM).

With the battery, motors, contraption, wiring, etc.. It's not going to make my car faster, nor accelerate better.

It will only offer:
1- All Electric Drive (mainly in low speed environments)
2- A better MPG and gasoline range by using electric and gasoline simultaneously, instead of driving on gasoline only.

Adding two of these motors to my car (with 20HP max rated), would mean I could drive all electric up to about 55MPH.
Anything beyond that, would most likely just take some of the MPG edge off (instead of 25-29MPG on the highway, I could be running 29-33MPG).

Anyone has ever tried something like this?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-20-2020, 03:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Stubby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747

Firefly EV - '98 Pontiac Firefly EV
90 day: 107.65 mpg (US)

Little Boy Blue - '05 Toyota Echo
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)

BlueZ - '19 Nissan 370Z Sport
90 day: 17.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 576 Times in 426 Posts
Adding a motor(s)? Yes, it’s been done.

Using washing machine AC motors? If it’s been tried, whoever did it was probably too disappointed with the results to report on it.

You need something with some grunt. Those little motors might pull enough power on startup to claim they peak at 5hp, but that’s for moments. They’re probably rated at about 1, or at most 2 horsepower continuous. They have low starting torque. They’re not appropriate for what you’re trying to do.

Find something rated at 5hp continuous and you’re on the right track. All a little motor can do, at best, is extend your P&G by a bit.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 04:18 AM   #3 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,644

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 194.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
What car are you planning to add this to?
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2020, 05:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,815
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,672 Times in 1,490 Posts
If I were going to work around electric motors, I'd take a look at those starter-generator units.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2020, 09:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
It would be a nice project, however, the reverse is really how a hybrid needs to run efficiently.
Ger an all electric car, and equip ot with a tiny engine, that directly drives the wheel through a reduction gear (gasolime or diesel). The thrust the tiny engine provides significantly increases electric range. And since the engine doesn't need to accelerate the car, just provide enoigh thrust to coast, getting 100mpg wpuld be an easy thing out of it.
The electric motors are there to accelerate the car to cruising speeds, and get disactivated when cruising at the fixed 30/45/60 mph speed limits of your regions, and only get activated again, when needing to overtake or speed up again.

Apparently Koenigsegg applied a similar technique in one of their newest cars, they equipped it with a tiny 400hp engine to provide extra thrust to the front wheels.
Though not with the intent of reducing emissions or increasing mpg, but with the intent to increase range.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2020, 02:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,260

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,565 Times in 2,829 Posts
Find the rear wheel motors before you go any further.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2020, 10:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,815
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,672 Times in 1,490 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDigit View Post
Apparently Koenigsegg applied a similar technique in one of their newest cars, they equipped it with a tiny 400hp engine to provide extra thrust to the front wheels.
You mean the Koenigsegg Gemera? IIRC its 3-pot 2.0L is rated at 600hp.


Quote:
Though not with the intent of reducing emissions or increasing mpg, but with the intent to increase range.
It was also meant as a showcase for the Freevalve camless system, which is surrounded by many claims that include its suitability to retain port-injection even with boost in order to not need a particle filter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2020, 11:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Easiest way would be to get a FWD with rear drive on demand (like most SUV's or my SX4), disconnect the drive shaft and splice the motor into there. Far easier than connecting to each drive shaft.

These rear axles are designed for light duty, I'd use it as a gridlock assist system, for parking, hill starts to save the clutch, that sort of thing.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2020, 12:09 AM   #9 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,815
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,672 Times in 1,490 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
Easiest way would be to get a FWD with rear drive on demand (like most SUV's or my SX4), disconnect the drive shaft and splice the motor into there. Far easier than connecting to each drive shaft.
Just like the Peugeot 3008 Hybrid4 worked.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com