06-18-2012, 07:46 PM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 245
Thanks: 111
Thanked 163 Times in 63 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyking
The low wing planes I flew would get stuck like that, you have to land to get them closed.
The high wing planes were a little more cooperative. You could always mess around with some rudder, induce a yaw that would alter the flow in your favor.
|
All you have to do is stall it, it'll close no problem.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 08:08 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
|
LOL, true that. I try not to stall the 310 with passengers onboard
__________________
2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle
currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 09:34 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 245
Thanks: 111
Thanked 163 Times in 63 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyking
LOL, true that. I try not to stall the 310 with passengers onboard
|
Twins are scary for me since I've only flown two, but I used to love to get up high in an Archer or J-3 or whatever, and just 'mush' just above a stall. It gives you a great feel for when and if they might let go when you're low and slow and it counts.
I think flying in that configuration for several hours (total, not all at once) should be mandatory for all pilots, GA and commercial. Off topic, sorry.
|
|
|
06-18-2012, 09:58 PM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
|
Your thread, and I took it out in the weeds :P
I have a smidge more multi than single engine time, but I have 400 hours flying banners at 45~60 MPH at all times. I agree on slow flight, I lived there.
__________________
2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle
currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
|
|
|
06-19-2012, 01:30 AM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 245
Thanks: 111
Thanked 163 Times in 63 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyking
Your thread, and I took it out in the weeds :P
I have a smidge more multi than single engine time, but I have 400 hours flying banners at 45~60 MPH at all times. I agree on slow flight, I lived there.
|
I miss flying, had to give it up to start my business, not enough $ to go around. Hope to return to it soon. Thanks for the comments.
|
|
|
06-19-2012, 12:28 PM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
Enthusiastic EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 90
Thanks: 4
Thanked 31 Times in 12 Posts
|
It seems the general consensus has been to choose belly pan or air dam, not both, so on my metro I only did the belly pan and saw good improvement. Then after a while I added an air dam and saw even more improvement in mileage and especially handling. The metro has a high stagnation point and forces a lot of air to pressurize under the car which led to unpredictable handling with the belly pan alone. By adding an air dam that lowered my stagnation point to the same level as the belly pan, air is no longer pressurized under the car. Instead, the majority of air is pushed over and to the sides the rest slips easily under the car with the belly pan - my handling has improved dramatically and I've seen good mileage results.
I suspect you would see a good result with the belly pan, and an even better result if you add an air dam. I originally tried to make my air dam really low which was a mistake as I busted it to smithereens. It seems that belly pan height is perfect and this allows it to clear curbs, driveways, and off road situations easily. I suggest you angle it like a wedge and curve it toward the sides of the vehicle as smoothly as possible so it forces air up and around the side of the vehicle. Cut appropriate grille openings if you cover the grill (I had to adjust mine a few times making bigger grill openings to accommodate high desert temps).
I've chronicled my build really well but gotten behind a bit so I don't have a writeup on my front air dam yet, I'll try to post it up soon.
__________________
"You too can get 50 Miles per Gallon, all it will cost is your self-respect."
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Geo Metropolis For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2012, 01:41 PM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 245
Thanks: 111
Thanked 163 Times in 63 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geo Metropolis
Cut appropriate grille openings if you cover the grill (I had to adjust mine a few times making bigger grill openings to accommodate high desert temps).
I've chronicled my build really well but gotten behind a bit so I don't have a writeup on my front air dam yet, I'll try to post it up soon.
|
Thanks for the input GeoM, I will try an air dam when I can get back to this. Let me ask you and everyone a question. The RV suspension has a nose down attitude. CamperBob visited a while back (thanks for the input Bob, I enjoyed meeting you) and commented that I might want to make some vertical panels running front to back (on the belly pan in the rear) to keep the turbulence down that occurs under there when the rear is higher than the front. I think that's what he said, if I got it wrong Bob I apologize.
Would anybody hazard a guess as to how much of an issue this is? I haven't been able to do any seriously valid testing since I did the belly pans but I don't think they made that much of a difference. I think what GM and CamperBob are pointing out may have something to do with it. What I'm considering is removing several leaf springs in the rear and installing air bags under the rear end so I can control the ride height regardless of load.
That's more of a functional issue than aero, but what the hell, it might help.
|
|
|
06-19-2012, 01:50 PM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
|
here's my take on that:
I think the area increasing underneath is a very good thing. This relieves pressure under the car, and it acts just like a good diffuser angle in that it happens gradually. I was going through Phil's pictures, and saw that one solar racer that had a tunnel in the back, an extreme example of what I am talking about.
__________________
2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle
currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to skyking For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-19-2012, 02:05 PM
|
#69 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 245
Thanks: 111
Thanked 163 Times in 63 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyking
here's my take on that:
I think the area increasing underneath is a very good thing. This relieves pressure under the car, and it acts just like a good diffuser angle in that it happens gradually. I was going through Phil's pictures, and saw that one solar racer that had a tunnel in the back, an extreme example of what I am talking about.
|
So you're saying the nose down attitude may be a good thing?
|
|
|
06-19-2012, 02:09 PM
|
#70 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
|
What are the measurements?
My truck runs from 10.5" to about 13", for example.
__________________
2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle
currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
|
|
|
|