Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2010, 03:59 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 332
Thanks: 16
Thanked 79 Times in 54 Posts
Send a message via MSN to markweatherill
Aero thoughts please





I wondered what the experts would think this car might be like aerodynamically.
It's a Toyota Will Vi and yes it is an odd shape! However Renault copied the rear end in the Megane, so perhaps it's got something going for it?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-14-2010, 08:36 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
It's pretty much the same as a hatch. When the flow leaves the roof, given the angle between the back edge of the roof and extremity of the bumper, anything aft is just in the wake.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 12:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
The front looks okay -- the same for the sides. The rear is not so great. And underneath?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 12:43 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Why didn't they just make that vehicle a hatchback instead of wasting all that space?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 12:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
Quest for a 400 mile tank
 
mjboks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 50

Adventure Truck - '07 Toyota Tacoma Double cab V6 TRD 4wd offroad
90 day: 19.26 mpg (US)

Commuter Bicycle - '94 Slingshot mountain bike
Thanks: 43
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
This design is great for an ecomodder to make kamm back or boat tail. I agree, it should be a hatchback and make that space useful and a bit more aerodynamic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 01:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Interesting looking car! First I've seen one.

I have to wonder about the arc of the trunk bodywork. It might actually make it worse than a proper hatchback that has a similar roof height end.

It'd be interesting to know what the flow is doing when it comes off the sides of that arc toward the rear low pressure.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 03:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
I'm with Tasdrouille, the trunk lid, (or more aptly "Boot Lid") is aerodynamically out of the picture, the clean separation of air at the back of the roof puts this out of any significant air currents. This roof design essentially has a KammBack designed in.

I think a KammBack is appropriate to add when a car design tries to blend the roof to the rear windscreen area with a small to medium sized radius. This causes the air to separate over a large area and creates turbulence.

Like Metro, I find the body work aft of the rear tires interesting. I tend to think that the design wants the air to try and sweep around the back as much as possible to help reduce the horizontal vortex formation in the rear of the vehicle....possibly?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 03:29 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
Seeing how the back of this thing is shaped it must have interesting c-pillar and rear quarter vortices.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 03:55 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 460 Times in 328 Posts
When Lincoln used that rear window angle, I think they claimed reduced cleaning time. However, it is mostly a gimmick to gain attention. What I see is mostly styling, within the modern, aero-influenced fashions in form. The corrugated panels, however, allow the use of thinner sheet metal.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 04:06 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
thoughts

Looks like the stylists won out over the wind tunnel guys.
The good news is that if they never let the thing out of Japan,no one will be hurt,as congestion will never allow the car to get above 45-mph.
If they export it to the US,then they should be dumped over-board before they ever have a chance to see the street.
A Boston Cd Party.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mercedes aero engineer: Cd of .20 feasible in production cars within 10 yrs MetroMPG Aerodynamics 42 11-10-2015 06:26 PM
CRV Cross Country Trip Aero - Temporary Aero Just for the Trip walteraxe Aerodynamics 26 01-05-2010 12:37 PM
Another Autospeed aero article: methods for measuring aero drag Daox Aerodynamics 4 02-14-2008 01:34 AM
New user intro and pick-up aero modding Blackbird Aerodynamics 4 01-28-2008 01:06 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com