07-24-2008, 02:10 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Deadly Efficient
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goshen, Indiana
Posts: 1,234
Thanks: 134
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
|
Aerodynamic/Hydrodynamic virtues of the '60's Amphicar
Okay, so there's plenty going on above the waterline, aerodynamically and otherwise...  ... but what I was wondering, is if the front wheel wells would be a better design aerodynamically as compared to the typical road vehicle.
__________________
-Terry
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
07-24-2008, 02:38 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Ex-lurker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jersey
Posts: 571
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
|
I think maybe the front wheel well was designed more for hydrodynamic performance, but certainly more cars could do with more consideration taken for their design. Drop that car a few more inches and it has a great front wheel dam/deflector.
I wonder what the effect of that wheel well design is aerodynamically vs standard?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-24-2008, 04:05 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
I'm thinking that the front is designed such that if you're descending a boat ramp into the water,the front won't"pearl",like an upside-down surfboard submerging upon striking a wave front.Aerodynamically,the ideal would be fully-enclosed wheels.I think the car is about compromise.It's not a great car and it's not a great boat.The "captain" IS great!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
07-25-2008, 12:04 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Ahoy there.
For a good example of an aerodynamically optimized "open" front wheel well, search for images of the GM EV1, Honda Insight, or Solectria Sunrise.
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2008, 09:33 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Deadly Efficient
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goshen, Indiana
Posts: 1,234
Thanks: 134
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
|
Here's the Insight;
and the Sunrise;
and the EV-1;
Pretty conservative, really, compared to the amphicar's.
__________________
-Terry
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2008, 10:41 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Conservative? I don't know - but properly designed for a road vehicle. The forward facing tire tread is tucked in behind bodywork, and the trailing edge of the wheel arch is generously radiused.
The amphicar's front wheel arch bodywork is designed to permit water flow to interact with the wheel/tire in a big way because the front wheels are what steers the car when in water.
Amphicar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
|
|
|
|
07-28-2008, 12:44 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Deadly Efficient
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goshen, Indiana
Posts: 1,234
Thanks: 134
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
The amphicar's front wheel arch bodywork is designed to permit water flow to interact with the wheel/tire in a big way because the front wheels are what steers the car when in water.
|
See? Now that's exactly why I posted this. Of course. I knew the front wheels were also 'rudders', but didn't make the connection. Thanks, Mr. Obvious! 
So what I'm inferring from what others have done (others with more money for research and wind tunnel access), is that the radius does not need to be too pronounced. Just nice and smooth to help the airflow reattach.
This could be a fairly easy mod for a guy with autobody repair skills. A little snip here, a little bondo there...
__________________
-Terry
|
|
|
|
|
