Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2008, 12:53 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
metroschultz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Norfolk, Va. USA
Posts: 869

CPT SLO - '93 GEO Metro plainjane
90 day: 53.91 mpg (US)

SilverHairBeauty - '01 Toyota Avalon XL
90 day: 24.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 33 Times in 28 Posts
Send a message via AIM to metroschultz
Think in terms of % of size
the alternator on any vehicle requires ~ 1hp to operate, even when electrically idle
sooo
300hp - 1hp = 0.33%
49hp - 1hp = 2.00%

Bigger difference in the smaller engine.

I'll shut-up now. S.

__________________


When you are courting a nice girl an hour seems like a second. When you sit on a red-hot cinder a second seems like an hour. That's relativity.
Albert Einstein
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-14-2008, 01:07 AM   #12 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 20,851

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
Last 3: 51.27 mpg (US)

Winter beater Metro - '00 Chevrolet Metro
90 day: 61.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,688
Thanked 5,596 Times in 2,873 Posts
I don't think peak hp is where it matters.

It takes approximately 6 hp to drive my car @ 40 mph on a level road. Regardless of whether that 6 hp is coming from a 3-pot capable of 49 max. hp or a V8 capable of 300, it still only needs to burn enough fuel to make 6 hp. So if you remove the hypothetical 1 hp burden of the charging system, you've just reduced power requirements by 1/6th for both motors.

The fuel savings of doing that won't scale exactly of course, due to the extra power required to overcome internal friction in the V8, and their different BSFC profiles & how they respond to changing load. But the effect definitely won't be proportional to the peak power of each mill.
__________________
Latest mods test: 15 mods = 15% MPG improvement: A-B test, 2007 Honda Civic 1.8L, 5-speed
Ecodriving test:
Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown: Nissan Micra 1.6L



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2008, 10:45 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 150

Silver Bullet - '02 VW Golf TDi
Thanks: 5
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
There are significant caveats, however.
Ah, the truth in advertising...

Nice write-up, BTW.
__________________
Best tank ever: 72.1 mpg in February 2005, Seattle to S.F.
New personnal best 'all-city' tank June '08 ... 61.9 mpg!
Thanks to 'pulse-n-glide' technique.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2008, 11:40 AM   #14 (permalink)
Lurking footless halls
 
Silveredwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: northeast
Posts: 249

Orient Blue - '02 BMW 325Ci Convertible
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
From a (now old) press rel: http://www.bmwreport.com/bmwmininews...w-5-series.asp

Quote:
Brake-energy regeneration is new to the 5 Series, which recycles previously lost energy by using a smart alternator and special battery. Whereas a conventional alternator constantly draws energy from the engine, the smart alternator only does so when the battery needs it — as well, engine energy generated while braking or descending a hill goes to charge the battery. This set-up achieves an overall three-percent improvement in fuel economy.
The 1-series is getting this too.

__________________
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. - Clarke's Third Law
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com