Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2012, 01:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdb View Post
"...the power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity."

In short, if you're looking for a vehicle that gets better gas mileage at 70 than at 60, you are not likely to find it.
I don't think that was the question (though my Insight does get better mpg at 50 than at 35). Rather, if you are constrained to travel at a certain high speed, what vehicle(s) will get the best mpg?

I think that's going to come down basically to CdA plus tires: a small car with good aero, and LRR tires.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-18-2012, 01:56 PM   #12 (permalink)
Polymorphic Modder
 
SoobieOut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 307

2006 DaCivic Hybrid - '06 Honda Civic Hybrid
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 40 Times in 25 Posts
There is always the famous TOPGEAR test
BMW M3 Beats Prius in Fuel Economy Test

Where a BMW M3 had better fuel economy than a Prius on a closed track. However the Prius was maxed out on speed and the BMW was barely taxed.

I think alot of economy at high speeds depends on gearing and where the engine/drivetrain was designed to operate.

A 1974 law (in the US) instituted a national speed limit of 55 miles per hour (a compromise between efficiency and speed). But as the oil crisis abated, the law was amended to 65 miles per hour in 1987 and finally repealed entirely in 1995, ceding the power to set speed limits back to the states. Now, many states have speed limits that exceed 70 miles per hour on interstates, and some stretches in Texas and Utah have limits as high as 80.

So older cars from the 70's and 80's may be designed for 55 MPH best fuel economy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2012, 02:30 PM   #13 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,244

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 259
Thanked 803 Times in 391 Posts
I think the only real option in the US is 1.9 TDI and from those cars the estate wagon has better aero. Ofcourse if you want to take the rough road and modify your CD to 0.2 any small petrol engine car would do fine.

Look from these forum a topic from my seat cordoba wagon and check its fuel economy.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2012, 04:24 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
above about 60 mph the vast majority of fuel used is to push the car through the air.

Effective Frontal area is king. Effective frontal area is actual frontal area and form drag.

so you want a REALLY narrow, short vertical height car which is REALLY tapered very well at the back. Sounds like you need one of my reverse trikes, or Ken Fry's cars.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2012, 04:50 PM   #15 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,394

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,189
Thanked 4,378 Times in 3,353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think that's going to come down basically to CdA plus tires: a small car with good aero, and LRR tires.
That, and gearing. My car has an extremely low Cd that is comparable to a Prius or Insight, but I'm screaming at 3000RPM @ 70mph down the highway. That's nearly 4300 RPM @ 100mph!

If I could figure out how to change the ratios or final gear, I would.

My guess is the Insight would be extremely efficient at 100mph compared to most any other car.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 03-18-2012 at 04:57 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2012, 05:12 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Sometimes, I'm just forced to ask why? Is it really so bad where you are?

That being said, I don't want to impose my values on you. However, physics isn't so kind. No matter what, you are going to pay a penalty for wanting to go faster. I'd say, given that the variables also include time, you should assess how much time would be saved by 55 mph versus 65 mph versus 75 mph etc. You said 5 hours, but that doesn't give us a good idea of distance. Are you saying roughly 300 miles? More? Less?

Anyway, in my opinion, you'll want to first assess how much time you're actually going to save by going 10 to 20 mph faster.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ladogaboy For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (03-19-2012)
Old 03-18-2012, 08:32 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Okay just ran some numbers with my Lamborghini example...
The Aventador has 7L, and spins at 2860rpm at 60mph. A Toyota Celica GT-S had about the same rpm for 60mph, but with 1.8L. This means we're asking the mighty 7L engine for only 1/3 of the torque that we're asking of the 1.8L engine, which is IIRC less than 25% of its available torque. The Aventador then is running at <10% peak BMEP...I think it's possible that 70mph could be better than 60mph in this car, despite the higher power requirement, because the engine efficiency is so much higher.

I don't know why people ignored my example, because the OP did ask for cars that got their best mpg at higher speeds.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2012, 09:51 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
The higher the speed, the more aerodynamic drag matters. The AeroCivic is case in point.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2012, 10:00 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
MosersMopars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 14

Manicured Knuckle Dragger - '01 Dodge Durango SLT 4x4
90 day: 14.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
My former 1996 Dodge Grand Caravan (same model until 2000) would get the same average economy on a 55mph trip as a 70 mph trip. It was modded to 27 MPG. It had the 3.3L v6, 4 speed auto, and 15 inch wheels, also a roof rack. Had to make sure the tire size was correct, and I'm sure some aero mods would have helped too. My 3.8L GC would get terrible mileage over 55 with all other options identical, though it didn't notice a 1 inch tire height difference. Note that these two engines are in the same family, but have drastically different personalities. The 3.3 likes to rev, the 3.8 makes TORQUE. I only miss those vans when I'm at the pump.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2012, 11:48 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
My guess is the Insight would be extremely efficient at 100mph compared to most any other car.
Yeah, considering that you need a long downhill or good tailwind to hit 100 mph :-) Or with MIMA you can use the electric assist to get there for a minute or so. It does get about 40 mpg IIRC.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com