06-02-2010, 10:54 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
Article: Ultra-Efficient Gas Engine Passes Test
Hello -
While reading DIM's thread I stumbled on this :
Technology Review: Ultra-Efficient Gas Engine Passes Test
Quote:
Transonic Combustion, a startup based in Camarillo, CA, has developed a fuel-injection system it says can improve the efficiency of gasoline engines by more than 50 percent. A test vehicle equipped with the technology gets 64 miles per gallon in highway driving, which is far better than more costly gas-electric hybrids, such as the Prius, which gets 48 miles per gallon on the highway.
The key is heating and pressurizing gasoline before injecting it into the combustion chamber, says Mike Rocke, Transonic's vice president of business development. This puts it into a supercritical state that allows for very fast and clean combustion, which in turn decreases the amount of fuel needed to propel a vehicle. The company also treats the gasoline with a catalyst that "activates" it, partially oxidizing it to enhance combustion.
|
Fuel heater + more pressure?
Here's the company :
Transonic Combustion | Ultra-high Efficiency Fuel Injection Systems
CarloSW2
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cfg83 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-02-2010, 11:12 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 135
Thanks: 54
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
|
I wonder how hot and how much pressure it takes to make a difference? and how much heat can conventional injectors handle without damage?
Seems like it would be easy to heat the fuel with the exhaust, electric fuel pumps are available for 100+ PSI but re-tuning the ECU would be the real work involved but even that can be done.
|
|
|
06-03-2010, 12:46 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 513
Thanks: 2
Thanked 101 Times in 74 Posts
|
color me sceptical -
since the mass of the fuel is about 1/15th the mass of the air
in the air fuel mixture prior to combustion
it would seem that air temperature would be far more critical and have a much Larger impact than
fuel temperature
and there has been no small amount of testing and experimentation regarding WAI
which does NOT yield similar test results claimed by this company ....
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mwebb For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-03-2010, 02:13 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
Gotta say, I just checked out the Board of Directors.....Robert Lutz just got on and Ray Rothrock (who has a VERY impressive Venture Capital background) is also on.
This is no Telsar Motors.
|
|
|
06-03-2010, 02:50 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Oh please
50+%?!?
How complete is the combustion event now? 99%?
|
|
|
06-03-2010, 07:09 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,953 Times in 1,846 Posts
|
Yeah, I suspect that increasing by 50% means that they decreased what is not completely burned by 50% -- so it went from 99% to 99.5%?
|
|
|
06-03-2010, 11:37 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
A big problem with leaning out the fuel air mix is getting a complete burn, that is why Honda's CVCC engine of the early '80's got better mileage is the rich mix that was needed for ignition was next to the spark plug, the rest of the combustion chamber was a very lean mix that would otherwise not ignite from a spark and the over all mix was leaner then normal.
I think it's the same idea as direct injection, have the fuel ignite without fully depending on a spark.
|
|
|
06-03-2010, 12:07 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
The road not so traveled
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
|
They are talking about engine efficiency, not burn efficiency.
A few things to note:
1. its direct injection.
2. uses compression ignition
3. No throttle plate (lean burn)
4. They are still not sure of long term durability
5. Gassoline at temperatures and pressures to be in a super critical state is a little scary.
|
|
|
06-03-2010, 12:29 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
|
|
|
06-03-2010, 07:08 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
|
Sooooo........
They took a diesel,
Lowered the compression,
And fed it gasoline........
Hasn't this been tried many times before???
Maybe with new 3D fuel map computers it will work this time.
|
|
|
|