06-19-2008, 02:09 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Veggiedynamics
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 684
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
audi TT areo.. way extreem... id say INSANE
__________________
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 02:16 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
I Robot movie car ??
With the wheels all bulged like that and a larger grille, this car would most likely have a higher drag than a stock TT ( and a larger frontal area. )
Sure looks futuristic though !
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 03:53 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
That's not quite the same as the I Robot car, but it sure looks similar.
Not enough taper on the backs of the wheel enclosures.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 03:56 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Deadly Efficient
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goshen, Indiana
Posts: 1,234
Thanks: 134
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
|
I...Like it! (Rocketeer quote)
Bring back the '30's, baby!
__________________
-Terry
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 04:00 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Ex-lurker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jersey
Posts: 571
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
|
I've always loved retro-futuristic stuff
__________________
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 04:32 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
.Cd -
Quote:
Originally Posted by .Cd
I Robot movie car ??
With the wheels all bulged like that and a larger grille, this car would most likely have a higher drag than a stock TT ( and a larger frontal area. )
Sure looks futuristic though !
|
That's egg-zactly what I was thinking :
I have no problem with it from a design POV. It's not practical, but I love it when people go for it.
CarloSW2
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 06:50 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: belgium
Posts: 663
Thanks: 14
Thanked 61 Times in 44 Posts
|
personally i think the stock TT is an aerodynamicly irrelevant car, sure the font looks nice and smooth as do all new audi's (apart from these huge grills they have lately), but what where they thinking at the back? seems like they just reused the front.. i think at least one person must have gotten in the wrong way round
i heared some race driver even managed to flip one of the early models at high speed, after wich they fitted a small lip spoiler at the back as standerd on the later models to cure the flow separation
since audi has a long standing history of good aero, and some of their new, and old, cars have really exemplary Cd's i really can't see how they justified this design... well i can, because as a shape it looks really nice... reminds me of a computer mouse designed by apple or something, but aerodynamicly it's a desaster
as for the modded one... i think the integrated dog cage is a nice feature
__________________
aerˇoˇdyˇnamˇics: the science of passing gass
*i can coast for miles and miles and miles*
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 08:26 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
yea...I'm THAT guy
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 21
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunarhighway
i heared some race driver even managed to flip one of the early models at high speed, after wich they fitted a small lip spoiler at the back as standerd on the later models to cure the flow separation
|
True, and actually there was a recall because of that for the 2000 and early 2001 model year cars. Owners of the spoilerless TTs were given the option of having the rear spoiler installed for free. If they declined, they had to sign a waiver. Naturally, a majority of the original owners took the free rear spoiler...which is why you'll rarely see a TT today without one.
__________________
1999 Audi A6 Avant Quattro - 2.8ltr 30v V6/Automatic - 149k miles
1993 Volvo 240 Wagon - 2.3ltr SOHC/Automatic - 323k miles
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 12:12 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
no rear-view mirrors, a blocked rear window, and wide rear window pillars.
I wonder how he drives in rush hour traffic.
( Does anyone see any rear view cameras on this car ? )
And ... I wonder how long that the super low fiberglass font end is going to remain un cracked.
|
|
|
06-20-2008, 04:21 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,391
Thanks: 24,469
Thanked 7,409 Times in 4,800 Posts
|
TT
Minority Report? It seems oddly familiar.Is it real? Can there be any suspension travel? Volkswagen/Porsche/Audi knows better than this! Real eye candy, but an aerodynamic monstrosity! Just when I thought Hollywood had done all the damage they could do to us with "Fast and the Furious," we get this? I think the media should be required to file an environmental impact study before they're allowed to release images like this.We've never recovered from the Triumph TR-7 advertising blitz of 1975.Audi is poised to knock us back another 30-years.Shame shame! Das ist gut aerodynamik-----------------nicht!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|