Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-10-2014, 04:39 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 120

Emerald - '97 Honda Civic CXi
90 day: 40.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 53
Thanked 53 Times in 32 Posts
Better wheel covers than 'smooth'?

I recently came across this paper: Investigation of Aerodynamic Resistance of Rotating Wheels on Passenger Cars (Alexey Vdovin, 2013) which draws the interesting conclusion that in some cases, "ventilation resistance" (fluid forces due to the rotation of the wheel and the pressure differential between the wheel well and the side of the car, as opposed to fluid forces due to the overall motion of the car) may have a sufficiently large effect on the energy use of a wheel that a flat wheel cover may not actually be the best solution overall, despite having nicer airflow from an 'overall motion of the car' perspective.

The solution which appeared to give the best results (under the particular parameters tested) was a cover over the outer radius of the wheel while leaving small openings near the hub (see pg. 20, figure 17 (f)):


While pondering how this scheme could best be applied to my mags, I happened to park next to a Prius which had these wheels:
- apparently from the 2004 model. The 'trim' on this wheel looks suspiciously similar in general layout to the suggested design from the above paper. I can't find any reference to this being an efficiency feature, but maybe Toyota knew something about this that it wasn't letting on?

I'm thinking there would be two ways to fabricate something like this:
(1) As a ring of material ala the existing style of smooth covers seen here, with appropriate holes cut out, and zip-tied or similar to a mag wheel.
(2) As a set of 'gap fillers' which would fit between the spokes of a mag.
I don't think this is likely to work with covers on pressed steel wheels though, as the existing holes are generally nearer the rim than the above examples...

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Outer radius.jpg
Views:	534
Size:	6.1 KB
ID:	16057  
  Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Madact For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-10-2014), Cd (10-10-2014), RedDevil (10-10-2014), Xist (10-11-2014)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-10-2014, 06:22 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,695
Thanks: 8,144
Thanked 8,924 Times in 7,367 Posts
At the end they admit they're only scratching the surface.
Quote:
Lastly a more detailed investigation of the airflow inside the wheelhouse and around it can be conducted in order to evaluate interaction between ventilation resistance and underbody flow.
I wrote out this long analysis, but vBulletin ate it. It does that whenever you don't Copy before you Preview.

Anyway, the thick outer radius cover trades places with the full wheel cover in Figures 20 and 21, looking at the combined overall drag.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-11-2014)
Old 10-10-2014, 07:35 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
I wonder how well thought out the original hub caps were on my Sentra.

regards
mech
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	001 (16).JPG
Views:	140
Size:	83.2 KB
ID:	16059  
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2014, 07:52 AM   #4 (permalink)
Not bad for a machine
 
dirtydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,024

Maechunbu - Retired - '00 Kia Sephia 1.8I4 16VDOHC
Last 3: 45.28 mpg (US)

Slasher - '96 Chevy Corsica 2.2L 3speedauto
Duct Tape Aero Crew
Team Chevy
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 279
Thanked 242 Times in 179 Posts
Wouldn't a perfect smooth surface be best? Just not best sellers?
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2014, 08:09 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 120

Emerald - '97 Honda Civic CXi
90 day: 40.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 53
Thanked 53 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Anyway, the thick outer radius cover trades places with the full wheel cover in Figures 20 and 21, looking at the combined overall drag.
True, but looking at figs. 19, 20 and 21, thick outer radius wins for the ventilation resistance component, smooth wins for the aerodynamic resistance component, but thick outer radius wins for the combined effect. They may not know exactly why & how yet, but if experimental data shows lower overall resistance for a different desgn, that at least says "worth a look" to me
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Madact For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-11-2014)
Old 10-10-2014, 03:18 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Lest we gloss over the obvious, let me point out that they used a seemingly very effective way to attach wheel covers: two threaded holes in each spoke. Presumably not enough to significantly weaken the wheel, but with stainless screws and loc-tite, quite professional looking and long-holding.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sven7 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-11-2014)
Old 10-10-2014, 06:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
earlier research

earlier research singled out the solid,convex,full-coverage,'MOON' type disc as having lowest drag.
For an aspirated cover, GM's Ultralight covers demonstrated low drag while allowing for brake cooling.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/

Last edited by aerohead; 10-11-2014 at 01:49 PM.. Reason: spelling
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Madact (10-11-2014)
Old 10-10-2014, 07:39 PM   #8 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Am I missing something ? I read this as meaning that a fully covered wheel is best for low drag :

" Also, as predicted, the Fully covered rim design produced the lowest aerodynamic resistance, closely followed by the Thick outer radius cover."
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2014, 08:52 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Alaska
Posts: 100

n/a - '05 Ford Focus ZX3
Thanks: 5
Thanked 65 Times in 27 Posts
One thing that occurs to me is that the basic rims that were under the wheel covers in these tests were very well-ventilated 5-spoke rims. In Fig. 21, the "total" curves for a full cover and the optimal cover are quite close together. If the test were done with standard pressed steel rims, which are less well ventilated because they have many small holes, perhaps the full covers would give better comparative performance than in the test.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2014, 01:48 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
Sentra

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
I wonder how well thought out the original hub caps were on my Sentra.

regards
mech
They look really efficient.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
aerodynamics, wheel covers





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com