Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-08-2010, 06:44 AM   #21 (permalink)
Coasting Down the Peak
 
skyl4rk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: M I C H I G A N
Posts: 514

Toyauto Pickup - '94 Toyota Pickup 2WD
90 day: 36.32 mpg (US)

Versa Base - '09 Versa Sedan 1.6 Base
Team Nissan
90 day: 41.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
The benefits are that there are no street crossings to stop for, and it looks like it would be much cheaper to build a monorail bridge over a river than a bicycle path or road bridge. That is the most interesting part, the infrastructure looks relatively simple to build in comparison to road building, at least for bridges. Obviously this is only good for densely populated areas.

__________________
Nissan Versa Aeromods
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-08-2010, 06:58 AM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,302 Posts
Another idea would be to treat it like a roller coaster where there were sections that had a drive mechanism to lift you up an incline, then a shallow decline to provide some added energy to the vehicle.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 07:00 AM   #23 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,578

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 73
Thanked 332 Times in 232 Posts
The nice thing about building elevated bikeways is that people on bikes don't occasionally crowd together to watch something to nearly the same density that they do on a pedestrian bridge. Consequently, the loading is about 5 times lower per square foot than for highways or footpaths. The same advantage would benefit the monorail. It also gains from having steel wheels, with very low friction. I'd like to have the option to ride my bike, all packed from shopping, onto a monorail car that gives an all-weather, streamlined cover. However, any old separated bike expressway would do, and the nearby residents might prefer it to the sound of steel wheels.

Many cities have bike routes along waterways that are a good sample of what could flow all over a city, without cutting it up like a car expressway. At rush hour, the bikeway would be going at least as fast as the car highway anyway.

During the planning for a steep hillside community, I proposed laying out all the streets at about 2 deg slope, with occasional bike lifts going straight up across the grid, powered by available water. You could coast down from anywhere to a lift road, and from there down to anywhere else.

Last edited by Bicycle Bob; 10-08-2010 at 07:07 AM.. Reason: Addendum for cross-posting inserted
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 07:11 AM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,666

GasDwarf - '13 Volkswagen up! EcoFuel CNG
Thanks: 176
Thanked 639 Times in 506 Posts
As to the original idea : where do they store the pods when they're not needed ?
By volume they are a good lot harder to stack away than a bike.
As they're obviously not personal means of transport, they'll be neglected and vandalised.

Aerodynamically they're even the wrong way around

Quote:
Originally Posted by skyl4rk View Post
The benefits are that there are no street crossings to stop for, and it looks like it would be much cheaper to build a monorail bridge over a river than a bicycle path or road bridge.
Don't elevate, but sink bicycle paths.

The infrastructure wouldn't be nearly as intrusive and visually polluting.
The average rider is a lot lower than the height requirements for motor vehicles. Ramps to ground level could become shorter or less steep.

The bicycle path can be rather narrow, negating the need for complex road bridges, all that's needed is a simple short-span bridging structure that can be standardized.

Bicycle trences also cut down on the wind.


The open trench bicycle paths can become an emergency buffer capacity to counter the flash-flooding that more and more densely populated regions are seeing.
(It's not due to climate change, it's the huge increase in hardened surface area hitting back.)
__________________
GasDwarf's fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 07:26 AM   #25 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,578

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 73
Thanked 332 Times in 232 Posts
Any of these pod-based transit systems can benefit from the ability to make up trains and do merges neatly. This could be automated to any extent with electrified roadways. For anything resembling current expressways, we could have a moving LED display along an entrance ramp, showing where a gap will arrive if we maintain the standard acceleration it is moving at. Just pace yourself to the green dots, and not the red ones, and there will be room in the lane you want.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 08:02 AM   #26 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ˙
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 267 Times in 210 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
P&G on a bike might make sense at a walking pace, but if you P&G at higher heart rates, you're doing it wrong....
That seems accurate, though walking pace for a bike is significantly faster than actual walking and likely much more efficient since you can coast and your legs balance each other out rather than lifting and dropping (and your whole body lifting a bit each step). So you *should* be able to cover a lot more ground and do it faster on a bicycle using only the effort of walking.

Edit, ok maybe that is too obvious http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_performance

"A human being traveling on a bicycle at low to medium speeds of around 10-15 mph (16–24 km/h), using only the power required to walk, is the most energy-efficient means of transport generally available. Air drag, which increases roughly with the square of speed,[4] requires increasingly higher power outputs relative to speed, power increasing with the cube of speed as power equals force times velocity. A bicycle in which the rider lies in a supine position is referred to as a recumbent bicycle or, if covered in an aerodynamic fairing to achieve very low air drag, as a streamliner.
Racing bicycles are light in weight, allow for free motion of the legs, keep the rider in a comfortably aerodynamic position, and feature high gear ratios and low rolling resistance.

On firm, flat, ground, a 70 kg person requires about 30 watts to walk at 5 km/h. That same person on a bicycle, on the same ground, with the same power output, can average 15 km/h, so energy expenditure in terms of kcal/(kg·km) is roughly one-third as much. Generally used figures are"
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!

Last edited by dcb; 10-08-2010 at 08:12 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 12:56 PM   #27 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 145 Times in 97 Posts
If I am going to power my own transport, I will want to go directly from my point of origin, to my destination. A pedal powered light rail may get me close but then I have to disembark and I will be without my bike to get me the rest of the way there.

__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do You Love Your Fuel Efficient Clunker? SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 14 06-29-2009 12:45 PM
E-Star freezers - how so efficient ? Cd Saving@Home 20 06-24-2009 07:40 PM
GPS Navigation Saves Gas Through More Efficient Route Selection SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 0 05-04-2009 11:50 AM
Even With Cheap Gas, We Still Want Fuel Efficient Vehicles SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 3 02-23-2009 02:56 AM
Big Surprise: Fuel efficient cars are holding their value better than other cars SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 2 09-19-2008 08:52 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com