Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-28-2008, 07:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 8

The Beast - '89 Chevrolet G30 (Cube) Cube Van
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Very Ironic!!!...Doncha think?

I know I am going to get "hammered" from you guys for this but how is it possible to save money on fuel when alot of you are spending on items to save money for fuel?

Where is the fuel to cost savings?

Seems a little ironic in my opinion that this forum is here to help others in fuel savings yet alot of items suggested cost hundreds if not thousands of dollars.

* Gear Vendors Units = Upwards of $5,000.00, how long will it take from a 2-4 MPG increase to pay that off?

* Engine swaps = God only knows
* Tranny Swaps = Same as above
* Embarrasing Modifications = JUST EMBARASSING

I know alot of suggestions are helpful as most items can be fabbed up for next to nothing and net beneficial results and in the long run save money, Some of the items are just god aweful you people are installing on your vehicles and to net a 1.0 MPG savings, I think I would be a little embarrassed to consider that sort of a savings and to fork out thousands to try and decrease fuel consumption makes "NO SENSE" at all.



Simple suggestion to those even thinking of swapping trannies, engines or installing a GVR or doing some sort of embarrasing act to save a little money.....

DO NOT DRIVE AT ALL

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-28-2008, 08:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
midnight rumbler -

I think it depends on your POV. If your litmus test for a(n embarrasing?) mod is the payback time, that is 100% fine with me. For others, this is not an issue because they enjoy the challenge of improving MPG. It's like installing a turbo to cut x.y seconds off your 0-60. Arguably, that's a "waste" of money, right?

Here's the 100+ tips for you to read. You'll be happy to know that your suggestion is at the top of our list :

100+ hypermiling / ecodriving tips to increase gas mileage - EcoModder.com
Quote:
1) Drive less
2) Park and ride (bicycle)
3) Attend a driving clinic
4) Clean junk from your trunk
5) Let the most efficient driver drive
6) Join a fuel economy forum
...

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 09:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I use the cost/benefit analysis to decided if I'm going to do a mod or not. Still, the other mods make for good reading, whether they are ridiculous or not. You never know where inspiration will strike. YMMV.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 10:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 460

WonderWagon - '94 Ford Escort LX
Last 3: 51.52 mpg (US)

DaBluOne - '99 Ford Escort SE
90 day: 48.97 mpg (US)

DaRedOne - '99 Ford Escort ZX2 Hot
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rumbler View Post
* Gear Vendors Units = Upwards of $5,000.00, how long will it take from a 2-4 MPG increase to pay that off?
Probably more computationally convenient think in terms of how far until it pays off.

Gear Vendors is upwards of $5,000.00 new and commercially installed - considerably less if it's used and installed by yourself.

Of course pay off distance is heavily dependent on the price of fuel.
Just for giggles assume:
  • Current MPG = 11
  • FE gain from Gear Vendors is 10%, so projected MPG is 12.1.
  • Commercially installed new Gear Vendors = $5,000.
  • User installed used Gear Vendors = $2,000.
If fuel is $2.00 per gallon, pay off begins at ~300,000 miles new & ~120,000 miles used.
If fuel is $3.00 per gallon, pay off begins at ~200,000 miles new & ~80,000 miles used.
If fuel is $4.00 per gallon, pay off begins at ~150,000 miles new & ~60,000 miles used.

If you're driving a commercial delivery route and average 50,000 - 60,000 mile s per year the last two sets of numbers for used equipment starts to look intriguing. Finding the used Gear Vendors appropriate for your transmission at a reasonable price will require lots of good luck and probably a considerably amount of hunting.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 10:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
It all depends on hw much you drive and fuel prices.

If you drive less than 8,000 miles per year and gas costs less than $1.50/gallon - forget about it.

If you drive 25,000 miles a year and fuel is north of $3.00/gal, a fairly large expenditure is justified.

Of course, crowing rights are priceless.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 10:51 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
For me, it's about using less gas, not saving money. Though I'm not wealthy, I make a good income & choose not to live extravagantly, If I wanted to drive a Hummer or Escalade, paying for the gas would be the least of my worries. The cost of gas that I worry about isn't the money going out of my pocket, but the costs of financing jihad and dumping vast amounts of fossil CO2 into the atmosphere.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 11:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
Civic 4 Life
 
KJSatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 229

Civics Lesson - '08 Honda Civic LX
Team Honda
90 day: 40.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Which mods are the most embarrassing?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2008, 11:46 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: United States of Texas
Posts: 43

Princess - '08 Chevy HHR LSSR
90 day: 23.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Good post

Good post. I know I have spent more money on my mods than I should and realistically I may never recover those costs. I also know some of the Embarrassing mods work and we will see some of those things in future production vehicles.
For me I am trying to build a car that looks good and performs at its best (whatever that is)

It all comes down to what you want in a car. Many people just buy a car, put gas in it and go. Others want to modify it to fit them better be it a sound system, paint job, mileage or performance mods.
If you are comfortable or happy just putting gas in your car and driving you would not understand why we do mods. That is OK it just depends on what you want.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 12:13 AM   #9 (permalink)
38 time NHRA/IHRA Champ
 
ATaylorRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 305
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
I will not hammer you because in my case it IS about saving $$$.

I bought a 3 cyl Geo and was getting 50-57 mpg hiway compared to the SRT4 Neon that I was using for longer trips. Effectively the Geo gets double the mpg that the SRT4 gets, but in order to save money I must drive it at least enough to spend $20 per month in gas. That figure is how much the insurance coverage cost is. As of a few weeks ago I parked it and took the insurance off. When warmer weather comes and more people start buying Mustang rims from me I will reinstate the insurance as I start to deliver the rims with this car. No deliveries have been made since October....darn it.
__________________
42 time NHRA/IHRA drag race champ

05 SRT4-12.17@117 mph on DOTs-31.0 mpg-SOLD
96 Geo Metro-3 banger-60.1 mpg-SOLD
95 BMW M3-13.41 @ 106 mph-31mpg-SOLD
77 Chevy Monza with 350/350-FOR SALE
84 Horizon-1880 lbs-29 mpg
95 Neon-43 mpg
99 Z28-10.80 @ 127 mph-27.1mpg
2011 Prius-62.1 wife's
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2008, 12:31 AM   #10 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,959 Times in 3,603 Posts
Midnight rumbler: as has been pointed out, people have different motivations for modding their vehicles to improve efficiency. Saving money isn't automatically one of them for everyone.

To get a better grip on this, see: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...here-6241.html

And: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...dding-256.html

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com