09-05-2008, 07:15 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
Big Bore throttle body for MPG?
Hello -
I just saw this on e-bay :
eBay Motors: Saturn S-Series BIG BORE Throttle Body SC, SL, SW 91-02 (item 300256144389 end time Sep-11-08 18:42:01 PDT)
Quote:
These throttle bodies are professionally lathe bored to ensure a precise and consistent bore
Not a quick and sloppy dremel job
Each throttle body is taper bored from the throttle plate out to 52mm on the front and back
Gain up to 12hp and Save Gas too!
|
Do you think this will help for MPG? My semi-edumacated guess says no.
CarloSW2
Last edited by cfg83; 09-12-2008 at 12:31 PM..
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 10:39 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lake Elmo, MN
Posts: 109
Thanks: 2
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
|
No way it would save fuel. It gives you less control of high vacuum airflow over a smaller or standard throttle body. The only thing I can think of where that statement might be true is that the TPS values vs airflow would be different than stock causing a potentially dangerous lean condition. Very few aftermarket parts will positively affect FE.
__________________
In the garage:1993 civic 1978 hobbit 1976 jimmy
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 11:23 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
Hondaguy72 is right. There is no way a larger bore throttle body will save fuel. In addition to what he said, the larger bore throttle body will decrease low rpm torque (increase higher rpm torque) which is the exact opposite of what we want.
I don't think you'd have a problem with lean conditions as the O2 sensor will ultimately correct for it.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 02:30 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
hondaguy72 and Daox -
Thanks for the feedback. I didn't think it would work but I didn't know exactly *why* it wouldn't work.
I think a lot of HP mods are just adding the "saves gas!" claim to all their stuff these days.
CarloSW2
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 02:47 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
|
The saturn must have crazy delay timing wise to want a bore that big...variable valves or other gookiness.A dog chasin its own tail is very modern car , and inlines feed that crazy function..
A true stoich from timing at idle on up would not even need 75% of that bore...but that is today and gook injection and gook takin over the world.
Visegrips announced it is moving to china.
|
|
|
09-05-2008, 02:56 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Speedway, Indiana USA
Posts: 56
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Also looking at the ad, it appears to me like they are boring the casting but leaving the throttle plate (which is the real airflow restriction) untouched.
FWIW - S Sats definitely don't have variable valve timing (I've owned several - SOHC and DOHC).
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 05:18 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,363 Times in 4,763 Posts
|
big bore
There is a "truth" to what they say,but it's taken completely out of context,as other members intuit,to capitalize on disgruntled motorists attempting gas saving mods.At WOT,the intake tract WOULD be closer to atmospheric pressure,so pumping losses would be reduced a fraction( less than an inch of mercury delta-P).BMW's attempt to remove the throttle body and entire intake(save for the air cleaner) tract,including the camshaft and conventional lifters,is a more visionary approach to reducing losses.---------------- I give the big -bore "the big Spanish Archer" as Burt Munro would say.A big thumbs down!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 05:58 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
ideal air velocity is around 300 feet per second, faster then that and you get restriction problems, slower then that and you loose torque and efficiency, it's similar to running to large of an exhaust pipe, if less restriction was the key then running without any air box and no air intake tubing would be ideal and everyone would have their exhaust exit the side of their car, but that is not how engines work best.
|
|
|
09-12-2008, 11:08 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
38 time NHRA/IHRA Champ
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 305
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
|
From my own experience I can tell you that a slightly bigger TB can give more HP and FE. The TB in the E-bay add would do both, but NO WAY are you going to gain 12 HP! The throttle plate is the same as stock and all they are doing is cleaning up the air flow going into the TB.
On a bone stock 3.0 liter V6 Dodge Shadow/Plymouth Sundance from the early 90s going from the stock 42mm TB to a 52 or 56 one off a 87 mini van with the same, but older motor picks up about .25 seconds in the 1/4 mile and from 1.2-1.8 mpg (1.7 in my case).
On my 98 SOHC Neon I went to a HUGE Indy Cyl Head intake and the FE stayed the same and I lost torque, but gained higher rpm power...no improvement in the 1/4 either (advertised a 25 hp improvement with a bigger TB.....So I bought the AF/X 60 mm TB and picked up a bit over 1/2 sec in the 1/4 and FE became nearly 2 mpg better.
On EVERY car I have owned.....if I was cruising, any air flow improvements into the motor made more FE and power....on MOST a better flowing exhaust did the same thing, but not on the V6...a better flowing exhaust made it have worse power and FE until I did a lot more mods....the stock set up worked the best initially.
What I have found is that with the extra power you can drive up to your speed easier and maintain it with less throttle = better FE.
__________________
42 time NHRA/IHRA drag race champ
05 SRT4-12.17@117 mph on DOTs-31.0 mpg-SOLD
96 Geo Metro-3 banger-60.1 mpg-SOLD
95 BMW M3-13.41 @ 106 mph-31mpg-SOLD
77 Chevy Monza with 350/350-FOR SALE
84 Horizon-1880 lbs-29 mpg
95 Neon-43 mpg
99 Z28-10.80 @ 127 mph-27.1mpg
2011 Prius-62.1 wife's
|
|
|
09-12-2008, 03:11 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 55
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATaylorRacing
On EVERY car I have owned.....if I was cruising, any air flow improvements into the motor made more FE and power....on MOST a better flowing exhaust did the same thing ...
What I have found is that with the extra power you can drive up to your speed easier and maintain it with less throttle = better FE.
|
Similar experiences here.
Switching to an oversized TB sometimes brings drivability problems for street & road, however. Unless the OEM TB is clearly undersize for the application (rare), the TB is one of the last things I'd fiddle with in the intake system.
BTW any TB has some potential for improvement. Every bit helps:
__________________
|
|
|
|