Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-19-2008, 11:18 PM   #11 (permalink)
Lurking footless halls
 
Silveredwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: northeast
Posts: 249

Dark Horse - '16 Ford Mustang GT convertible Premium

Gutless Beauty - '19 Toyota Corolla SE
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peakster View Post
I can't imagine people thinking "I need better fuel economy. I'm going to get a 2nd mortgage so I can buy a BMW M5".
The 520d is about a third the price of an M5.

__________________
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. - Clarke's Third Law
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-19-2008, 11:51 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
H4MM3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mackinac City, Michigan
Posts: 235
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HotRod View Post
Here, diesel is $3.93 and Reg. is $3.17. That's 24% more expensive. Call me crazy, but unless the Beemer can toast a Prius by at least 24% (mpgs), the Prius is still the way to go...from a dollars and cents perspective.

I couldn't agree more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 12:59 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina SK Canada
Posts: 407

Red Jeep Patriot - '07 Jeep Patriot
90 day: 25.14 mpg (US)

Beige Ford Ranger - '95 Ford Ranger XLE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silveredwings View Post
The 520d is about a third the price of an M5.
Oh wow, it is a 520d. It looks extremely similar to the M5.



In fact, they look so similar, what's the point of spending 3X as much money for a car that looks the same ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2008, 01:22 AM   #14 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
A bit off topic, but close enough

What we really need is the 2.0L Diesel in the new-to-U.S. 1-Series that's "back". I'd say from a performance perspective (0-60 MPH), around 9-10 Seconds is "expected" for an average car, and at least 8-seconds from Premium marque. Some facts, figs, and specs...



What we get (Coupe and Convertible Only, Best FE with the Automatic 6-speed with Auto-Stick mode):

128i: 3.0L DOHC, Variable Valve Timing/Lift, I-6: Rated at 230 HP / 200 ft-lb. FE: 18/28 (Premium Fuel); 0-60 in about 6 Seconds.
135i: 3.0L Twin-Turbo, Variable Valve Timing/Lift, Direct Injection, I-6: 300 hp / 200 ft-lb. FE 18/26 (Premium); 0-60 in 5 Seconds.

What Europe gets:

A 3-Door...


Nice and Functional...

A 5-door...


Practical and Fun...

The following engines are available (or some were available up to 2007, but not here)...

Gassers
1.6L / 116i, I-4, 122 HP / 111 lb-ft, FE: 32/49 U.S. Estimated (Regular Unleaded); 0-60 in 10.1 Seconds (Manual), 11.4 Seconds Automatic. Last Production Year = 2007
2.0L / 120i, I-4, Variable Valve Timing/Lift, 170 HP / 155 lb-ft , FE: 22/34 U.S. Estimated (Regular Unleaded); 0-60 in 7.4 Seconds (Manual), 8.0 Seconds Automatic. (There was also a more efficient 118i / 2.0L pre-2008 at 30 City / 50 Highway and about 1-second slower)

Diesels
2.0L Diesel / 118d (different engine management program vs. 120d), Turbocharged, Intercooled, DOHC I-4, 143 HP / 220 lb-ft, FE: 41/67 U.S. Estimated; 0-60 in about 8.6 Seconds (Manual) ~ 9.0 Seconds Automatic
2.0L Diesel / 120d, Turbocharged, Intercooled, DOHC I-4, 177 HP / 258 lb-ft, FE: 39/64 U.S. Estimated; 0-60 in about 7.2 Seconds (Manual), 7.4 second (Automatic)
2.0L Diesel / 123d, Variable Twin-Turbocharged with Stop-Start System and Regenerative Braking, Intercooled, DOHC I-4, 204 HP / 295 lb-ft, FE: 45 MPG Combined U.S. Estimated; 0-60 in about 6.7 Seconds (Manual), 7.1 seconds (Automatic).

Where are these??? Yes, there is a replacement for displacement.

RH77
__________________
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 08:40 PM   #15 (permalink)
Lurking footless halls
 
Silveredwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: northeast
Posts: 249

Dark Horse - '16 Ford Mustang GT convertible Premium

Gutless Beauty - '19 Toyota Corolla SE
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peakster View Post
Oh wow, it is a 520d. It looks extremely similar to the M5.



In fact, they look so similar, what's the point of spending 3X as much money for a car that looks the same ?
Well, I think the M5 is a 4-door sleeper with 507 hp that does 0-60 in 4.1s and could lap a 911, and it yet doesn't scream "look at me!" I do see them up close occasionally, and think their secrets are well cloaked. I don't have that kind of money but I like how understated they are.
__________________
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. - Clarke's Third Law
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 08:40 PM   #16 (permalink)
www.mpgvalues.com
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
true, in terms of FE the BMW wotn match, but, if you need a bigger car, or heck just want a more luxurious ride then you cant count that BMW out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 07:37 PM   #17 (permalink)
EV OR DIESEL
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,758

FarFarfrumpumpen - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon GLS Premium

Quorra - '12 Tesla Model S P85
Thanks: 57
Thanked 113 Times in 86 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dremd
The M5 is an absolutely phenomenal automobile.
I've had the pleasure to drive 2 of them. Silent, smooth, comfortable, roomy, factory fuel economy instrumentation, and it goes like hell.
That Said if I were buying I'd prefer the twin turbo Strait 6 5 Series. Smoother power, quieter, more fuel efficient and bucket loads of torque.

On the Speed V Economy bit . . . Once upon a time I drove a Supra 300 miles with the cruise set at 95 (never turned it off 1 time) on 7.9 gallons of fuel (38mpg). Conditions were ideal . . . . I KNOW that my Golf couldn't do that. Lifetime economy on the golf is around 55 mpg, and Lifetime on the Supra is around 19. Figures can be skewed.
__________________
2016 Tesla Model X
2022 Sprinter
Gone 2012 Tesla Model S P85
Gone 2013 Nissan LEAF SV
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 07:41 PM   #18 (permalink)
EV OR DIESEL
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,758

FarFarfrumpumpen - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon GLS Premium

Quorra - '12 Tesla Model S P85
Thanks: 57
Thanked 113 Times in 86 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dremd
Just noticed something

Quote:
BMW 520d with a 2.0-liter diesel engine and regenerative braking
Can anyone elaborate? Just recharge the battery on Decel?

__________________
2016 Tesla Model X
2022 Sprinter
Gone 2012 Tesla Model S P85
Gone 2013 Nissan LEAF SV
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prius aero mods (undertrays, grille block, mirror delete...) krousdb Hybrids 46 08-02-2015 03:39 AM
Autospeed article: adding a chin undertray to a 1st gen Prius MetroMPG Aerodynamics 20 03-18-2014 06:31 PM
Fun and 50 mpg: Who needs a Prius? tasdrouille Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 9 02-15-2008 01:44 PM
Autoblog Prius review: more evidence of the power of MPG instrumentation MetroMPG Instrumentation 6 01-03-2008 12:48 AM
Bullfrog Power wind farm owner dumps his Insight for a Prius MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 0 12-17-2007 12:50 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com