03-12-2020, 04:08 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Brake pad drag reduction clips (theoretical)
I assume it might be worth it. Only expecting it to be say 10 to to 25 watts per wheel. I would be surprised if it saved more than 200 watts on all 4 wheels. In a perfect world with perfect brakes that never drag this would not be anything to consider. If they only save 100 watts definitely not worth it. Or they save 200 watts might be worth it over the life of a set of brakes.
According to Wikipedia the brake drag dynamic friction coefficient of brake pads is between 0.35 and 0.42u.
That means 1,000 newtons of brake force is countering 350 to 420 newtons of friction.
Math is a universal language and units are interchangeable so it come down to preference. So I self identify with units of imperial.
So if we know u, then we need force and distance so we can determine speed, once we know speed we figure power.
To get force simply take a measurement of how much the spring will be compressed, (hint: you may want to stretch the spring to a longer free length to get more force) then put the spring on a scale and measure the amount of force at target compression. I didn't actually do this last time but I have a set of springs in the mail, should be here today and I will measure them. So I will edit in an actual value later it's only going to be several pounds of force.
Worst case scenario I have to use the scales at work.
To get distance just measure the mean radius, or just measure from the center of the hub to as close as you can to the middle of the shinny area. You want the actual area of rub. This doesn't need to be high precision. For the rear of the leaf it's about 5 inches to the mean pad to the rotor rub area. So circumference is about 15.7 inches
Now we need speed. Go over to tirerack dot com, look up your tire make, model and size, go to specs and they have number of rotations per mile listed. For a leaf size energy saver A/S thats 836 revs per mile. I drive about 65mph so let's round that to 905 revs per minute, need it in units per second.
So the brake pad is covering about 19.73 feet of mean rotor circumference per second at 65mph.
If the brake pad drag reduction clips can reduce what seems lile a lot of drag lets go with what I think will be a high number of say 9 pounds off the pads, reducing let's say 3 pounds of force off the pads drag, that's 59.22 foot pounds of energy per second per wheel with that size brake rotor at that speed. Or 7,107 foot pounds per minute for the rear axle per minute at 65mph. That's substantially more than what I thought it would be.
Conversion of foot pound seconds to watts is
foot pound seconds /0.7376
So that comes out to 80 watts per back wheel. The fronts will be little more since they are bigger.
If we round all 4 wheels to 400 watts that's pretty substantial. At 65mph I run about 10kw so that's about a 4% reduction in drive power should directly translate to about 3% or 4% more range.
This is a higher estimate but I will know for sure when I compress springs on a scale. So it will still easily be 200 or 300 watts for all 4 wheels.
When you buy a pack of these clips you get 4. Put 2 on each front caliper when I put them on the leaf because the fronts were a little sticky, then I was going to order more and put them on the back. But I forgot. So they're only on the front.
Level of skill required:
If you can accidentally poke your self in the eye with a wire you have the necessary skills.
A c-clamp and some linemans pliers help.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
Last edited by oil pan 4; 03-12-2020 at 08:32 PM..
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-13-2020, 08:15 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
|
9 pounds of drag? How stuck are your calipers? That sounds too high to me when you exclude wheel bearing drag. I recall being able to keep the wheel spinning with not much effort from one finger once it got going.
|
|
|
03-13-2020, 10:09 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
I measured the springs.
They relieve 3 pounds of force each, 6 pounds per caliper.
Seems to pretty much cancel out all the brake drag.
So about 53 watts per rear wheel.
A little more for the front.
So around 200 to 300 watts of reduction for a small car like the leaf on the highway.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2020, 12:05 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
eco....something or other
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
|
Your math is great, but just because the springs have 3 lbs of force doesn't mean the pads are pushing that hard on the rotors. It may only take .5 lbs to push the pads back and the extra 2.5 lbs is only creating more room after the initial clearance is made. It only takes a few thousandths of movement in the pads to get them off the rotors. Let us know what the results are.
__________________
1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to IsaacCarlson For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-15-2020, 09:14 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
When I jack the car up and spin the tire with my foot it spins very freely now as if there is no brake drag.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
Last edited by oil pan 4; 03-17-2020 at 01:33 PM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-17-2020, 04:45 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
|
Thank you for this analysis.
|
|
|
03-17-2020, 01:23 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
I'll have to jack mine up and look.
A few weeks ago my wife and I put new calipers on her Fit, and the calipers came with these clips. While I was putting the summer tires back on it last night I spun the front tires and (even with the CV axles connecting them to the transmission) her drag-reduction-clip'd front wheels spin with basically zero resistance, and keep spinning for way longer than I'd expected - they spin with the same ease as rear drums.
|
|
|
03-18-2020, 08:54 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Evensville, TN
Posts: 676
Thanks: 237
Thanked 580 Times in 322 Posts
|
When I purchased some aftermarket brake drag reduction clips for a prior vehicle (2005 Tacoma) I found that a single factory clip actually had more pushing force than two aftermarket clips. So when I got my 1999 4Runner, I ordered factory Toyota clips (not expensive if already purchasing other parts to save shipping) and put one on each side of each caliper. (I also put new calipers on... clips don't help when a cylinder won't retract) I tried stacking two on each side, but inevitably that never worked right and one would bind up and make it worse.
|
|
|
03-19-2020, 10:39 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Slushbox ecomodder
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 22
Thanks: 36
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky
I'll have to jack mine up and look.
A few weeks ago my wife and I put new calipers on her Fit, and the calipers came with these clips. While I was putting the summer tires back on it last night I spun the front tires and (even with the CV axles connecting them to the transmission) her drag-reduction-clip'd front wheels spin with basically zero resistance, and keep spinning for way longer than I'd expected - they spin with the same ease as rear drums.
|
You wouldn't happen to have any pics of what the clips look like do you?
__________________
|
|
|
03-19-2020, 10:55 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fit_is_slo
You wouldn't happen to have any pics of what the clips look like do you?
|
They looked exactly like these:
https://www.homedepot.com/p/Raybesto...RoC1zEQAvD_BwE
You slip them in the calipers, and they provide a very small force to help the pads pull back from the rotors after braking.
Normally disc brakes have no way to retract the pads, unlike drums.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
|
|
|