Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-15-2012, 01:42 AM   #201 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
I think it must be 20 square feet, and in another thread the experts seem to think it will be Cd of .40

Who am I to argue with all the experts.

Hope to drive around the block tomorrow.

Thanks for the positive comments from the newcomers. The first motor is an older throttle body d15 with an auto trans.

It was "free" complete with the rest of the car.

Based on the reception I've gotten here, I really think the market is for the performance folks.

Folks in the performance arena see more advantages, like the 1000 pounds total curb weight. Throw a 300 horse mild turboed engine on it, and it should compete with a 1000 horsepower corvette in performance.

It will never compete with Neil's car however in mpg.

What kind of MPG are you getting with your car Neil?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-15-2012, 08:17 AM   #202 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Hi Doug,

No need to argue; I'm offering help. If you take a photo and send it to me, my offer still stands.

I'll discuss CarBEN EV5 on that thread; I hope to be starting the actual construction soon.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 04:08 PM   #203 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
I think it must be 20 square feet, and in another thread the experts seem to think it will be Cd of .40
Nah, that's just us pessimists. Estimates on the other end are in the sub-0.20 range, which is quite killer! I may be over-estimating the effects of the details of the design--and it sounds like you are already going to be improving some of those anyway.

With the narrow greenhouse, I wouldn't be surprised if the frontal area were close to 10 square feet. After all, the front of the car is not a 5-foot-wide rectangle.

I'm looking forward to hearing about when it runs!!

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 06:06 PM   #204 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 829
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Looks good Doug.

I think you did a great job on the tappered body other than that silly scoop. I really do believe your best option is to lose it completely.

Not sure what I think about the front clip. It's nice enough and I think would look great on the right vehicle that continues its lines to the rear, such as an older vette. But, I think a simpler cleaner look closer to an actual civic front clip would work better and save you a few bucks. Of course, getting it to transition to the narrowed portion is a very challenging problem.

Good luck with it. And yes, I do think this has great potential with the go fast tuner crowd. 1000 lbs and 800 horse worth of ridiculously boosted turbo motor should get that thing well into the single digits in the quarter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 08:34 PM   #205 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pete c View Post
Looks good Doug.

I think you did a great job on the tappered body other than that silly scoop. I really do believe your best option is to lose it completely.

Not sure what I think about the front clip. It's nice enough and I think would look great on the right vehicle that continues its lines to the rear, such as an older vette. But, I think a simpler cleaner look closer to an actual civic front clip would work better and save you a few bucks. Of course, getting it to transition to the narrowed portion is a very challenging problem.

Good luck with it. And yes, I do think this has great potential with the go fast tuner crowd. 1000 lbs and 800 horse worth of ridiculously boosted turbo motor should get that thing well into the single digits in the quarter.

Posts like this are why I quit sharing how to build the car.

So, if there were anyone else out there who ever wanted to do something like it, thank Pete for killing my help on this site.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 11:35 PM   #206 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Yeah, that Pete's been such a meanie.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 12:41 AM   #207 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
60 inches wide front fenders, 2 feet tall.

cockpit is 42 inches tall by 35 inches wide.

The windshield is behind the fenders. Does that mean my frontal area is 10 square feet, or 10 plus 5?
If those are still good numbers, I'd reckon it's probably between 13 and 14 square feet.

But the Cd is likely .40+.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 06-17-2012 at 10:27 AM.. Reason: Looked at the pics. Fenders appear 24"+; added area for 3rd wheel
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 01:35 AM   #208 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Elmira, NY
Posts: 1,782
Thanks: 319
Thanked 356 Times in 297 Posts
In college I studied mechanical engineering because I wanted to build racecars. It was a mistake. A Bachelors of Science gives you certain tools but at the risk of giving a big head as well. At the very least I learned to research a topic before attempting a project. In the end it comes down to sound thinking, and the right tools
I do agree that spending the time on safety considerations is very important and most of us don't have access to sophisticated mathematical modeling software. Using recommendations from sanctioning bodies such NHRA and SCCA can be helpful. A trianglated frame is good but using stressed panels with a tube frame can be effective if done properly.
When I owned a 2 door car, I would move the front seat forward after I got out if the rear seat passenger needed the room.

Last edited by Grant-53; 06-16-2012 at 02:15 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 08:50 AM   #209 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 829
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Don't let the door hit you in the arse, doug.

What a tempermental doosh. I've been pretty damn complimentary overall of his work, as have many others and we continue to get the same treatment.

And yes, that scoop isn't just silly. It looks like arse. It screws up what is otherwise a very nice looking rear half of the car.

My apologies to all those out there that I may have deprived of doug's car design brilliance.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pete c For This Useful Post:
wdb (06-21-2012)
Old 06-16-2012, 09:46 AM   #210 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
skyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399

Woody - '96 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 23.82 mpg (US)

Avion and Woody - '96 Dodge/Avion Ram 2500/5th wheel combo
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)

TD eye eye eye - '03 Volkswagen Beetle GLS
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)

Mule - '07 Dodge Ram 3500 ST
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
Rise above, folks. It is not just the OP that gets driven away by acrimony.

__________________




2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle

currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com