Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-02-2014, 11:54 PM   #41 (permalink)
XYZ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: nowhere
Posts: 533
Thanks: 31
Thanked 86 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
I completely agree on that point. Fiat 500, Mini, Juke, etc. are people OR cargo vehicles. A Fit, or Matrix or Vibe or some other good hatches, are people AND cargo vehicles. A true wagon would be even better, but apparently "Americans don't want those".
How much cargo can you fit into a Fiat 500 or a Mini? Almost nothing.

There is a market for American station wagons, but it has little to do with Americans not wanting them, and much to do with auto manufacturers not wanting to produce them.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-03-2014, 12:04 AM   #42 (permalink)
Just cruisin’ along
 
jcp123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,183

Beater Echo - '00 Toyota Echo
90 day: 42.67 mpg (US)

Hondizzle - '97 Honda Civic DX
Team Honda
90 day: 46.55 mpg (US)

Shaggin Waggin - '14 Chrysler Town + Country
90 day: 22.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 200 Times in 170 Posts
They're not unpopular in Europe. It would be easy for those marques to sell them here. I agree though, wagons FTW!
__________________



'97 Honda Civic DX Coupe 5MT - dead 2/23
'00 Echo - dead 2/17
'14 Chrysler Town + Country - My DD, for now
'67 Mustang Convertible - gone 1/17
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 04:53 AM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 52.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by XYZ View Post
How much cargo can you fit into a Fiat 500 or a Mini? Almost nothing.
Like PaleMelanesian pointed out: Leave out the passengers.
Fold the rear bench forward, then you can move stuff you cannot get in most sedan types like washing machines and drawer cabinets.

The 500 and Mini are niche products and aim at the no kids or second car market. Those who buy em simply don't want the extra space needed for both passengers and cargo.

If you do, there are larger hatchbacks. With the seats up you're pretty much limited in space, though usually the cover separating the trunk from the passenger area can be removed for higher items so you can load it to the rear window.

Now there is a type of car that has a longer trunk than a hatchback and on top of that, the lower part of the rear window is vertical allowing you to stack your stuff higher; almost wagon like.
That shape also helps to get better FE, and indeed they do quite well.
They are the 2nd(+) gen Insight and Prius.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 10:20 PM   #44 (permalink)
XYZ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: nowhere
Posts: 533
Thanks: 31
Thanked 86 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post

The 500 and Mini are niche products and aim at the no kids or second car market. Those who buy em simply don't want the extra space needed for both passengers and cargo.
I agree. All car manufacturing is aimed at niche marketing. But that niche of mini-hatches is mostly what I described as being a "fashion statement" - because those models are lacking in practical purpose.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 10:55 PM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
If you're looking for compact hatches, be aware of crash test ratings. If a car costs an extra $10 a month in gas but is safer, well I chalk that up to good insurance. While I agree, good driving techniques are a big deal (smith driving), sometimes **** hits the fan and its better to be prepared.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2014, 04:56 AM   #46 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 52.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
Big cars are not necessarily safer. some SUVs roll relatively easy, most hatches don't do that so easily.
You should always check safety ratings regardless of type.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2014, 10:34 AM   #47 (permalink)
Thalmaturge
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,164

Spicy Italian - '13 Fiat 500 Abarth

eBike - '94 Trek Mountain Track 820

CHONK - '18 Honda Clarity
Thanks: 766
Thanked 643 Times in 429 Posts
'15 Honda Fit earns Top Safety Pick rating | TechnologyTell

The small offset test is basically a worst case scenario (only 25% of the frontal area of the car taking the full impact causes most cars, even large ones -- especially SUVs for some reason -- to lose integrity).
Frontal crash tests

List of 2014 small cars (obviously doesn't apply to updated 2015 models, but still useful)
Safety ratings
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2014, 05:18 PM   #48 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
Those crash tests are misleading. They assume crashing into a stationary object or and object of the same weight. If you are driving around in a smaller then average car, then math and physics take over and your dead in your 5 star hatchback while the other diver walks away from his 3 star full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2014, 05:38 PM   #49 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
This is just small vs medium imagine any of these against a full size SUV Crash tests show how vehicle size, weight affect safety
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2014, 07:29 PM   #50 (permalink)
Karmann Eclectric
 
jray3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Graham, WA
Posts: 165

Odysseus - '00 Honda Odyssey

MR BEAN - '12 Mitsubishi i-MiEV SE

Karmann Eclectric - '71 VW Karmann Ghia Electric Conversion

BOB - '87 Ford 250 Lariat ext cab
Thanks: 9
Thanked 90 Times in 51 Posts
He's in California, so go electric

I love my Mitsubishi i-MiEV, and am putting over 18,000 miles per year on it, now at over 43k. The rear seats fold flat, enabling 50 cubic feet of cargo. For example, the i has carried: two 55 gallon barrels, twenty 20 liter beer kegs (empty), a 50" flat screen TV, a beach cruiser bicycle, a dozen nested 32 gallon trash cans (new), etc, etc.
It also tows 800 lb trailers quite comfortably.
Even with extensive use of public fee-based charging, my average energy cost is $0.024/mile.
It also has the torque to leave all ordinary traffic behind.
After the $7500 Federal tax credit, the car costs $15,500. Californica rebates bring it significantly lower.
Oh yeah, and the maintenance needs over nearly three years? Two cabin air filters, washer fluid, and a set of tires.

__________________
2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV, 112 MPGe
2000 Honda Odyssey
1987 F250 Diesel, 6.9L IDI, goes on anything greasy
1983 Grumman Kurbwatt, 170 kW "Gone Postal" twin
1983 Mazda RX-7 electric, 48 kW car show cruiser
1971 VW Karmann Ghia electric, 300 kW tire-smoker
1965 VW Karmann Ghia cabriolet, 1600cc
Have driven over 100,000 all-electric miles!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jray3 For This Useful Post:
mikeyjd (09-15-2014)
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
hatchback, mpg, new car, trading up





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com