Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-09-2011, 12:29 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Got some help through a PM thanks everyone.

__________________
2 cars one never gets driven the other is an MPG project already at 5% increase in standard driving economy CAI and Pulstar plus. Thinking weight reduction next year.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-12-2011, 01:41 PM   #12 (permalink)
Making Ecomods a G thing
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655

Angie - '08 Infiniti G35 X
90 day: 22.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
different cars react differently. my Jeep likes the intake temp between 100F and 110F, where as my girlfriends Ford Focus runs best 110F to 120F. my Jeep starts knocking around 120F, but her focus doesn't knock until around 140F-145F. i can't say for sure what the MPG gain is on either since i haven't done any testing, but my jeep gets better mileage to and from work tank to tank now (about 2 mpg better, 12 mile commute each way)
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 07:04 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Jacksonville, Fla
Posts: 2

RedRam - '14 RAM 1500
90 day: 18.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have not done any A-B-A testing for this. I do monitor my ScanGauge II like a hawk. My little Zippy show's a nice improvement in MPG when the AIT goes up. My result's are based on a steady Throttle Position (13), Speed (44mph), AIT (50F), MPG (43).
The same road, just a little further down. Steady Throtte Positon (13), Speed (46mph), AIT (70F), MPG (47),
And still further down the same road. Steady Throtte Positon (13), Speed (50mph), AIT (90F), MPG (50).

This has been proven everyday for months and months. I am really happy that the warm weather of Florida is here, 50F in the morning, and 80's during the day.

I don't run A/C cause it drops my MPG by 3, and I'm on my way home from work, so I do't care about a little sweat stain's.

One of these day's I will create an air duct coming directly from the radiator so when the Stat opens, I will get heat. But I want to have a controll mechanism to maintain the temp so that it does not go above 'X'. I don't know what the max temp is before the reverse effect happens, currently has not gotten above 108F. So more monitoring is in order.
I have a little difficulty getting my mind around this, because a colder air is better, just look at Inter-Coolers on Turbo's and other Compressors. But the daily fuel comsumption rates can't lie.

Just my 2cents on this, and no all vehicles will respond the same.

jim
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 08:03 PM   #14 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...a turbocharger puts heat "into" the air as it compresses the air; the purpose of the inter-cooler is to "remove" as much of that "added heat" due to compression as possible.

...since no inter-cooler is 100% perfect, the air coming out of the inter-cooler and going into the engine is almost always hotter than the outside air.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 10:39 PM   #15 (permalink)
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
theres not going to be a clear cut answer for what is best for either HP or FE.

my .02:

assuming we are not talking about temperatures consistant with Buffalo winters or Death Valley summers,
the specific vehicle's sensors, ecu, and engine design will dictate what kind of air the car likes best.

trial and error is the only way to confirm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 03:32 PM   #16 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by zonker View Post
trial and error is the only way to confirm.
Actually I think an engine on a test stand is the only way you will really be able to tell. Its not likely to be much of a difference and you can't isolate variables in the real world enough to keep them from swamping the results.

One thing I would like to mention is that a Warm air intake will increase you NOx emissions.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 04:04 PM   #17 (permalink)
Making Ecomods a G thing
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655

Angie - '08 Infiniti G35 X
90 day: 22.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...since no inter-cooler is 100% perfect, the air coming out of the inter-cooler and going into the engine is almost always hotter than the outside air.
it will always be hotter than outside air, since you are using the outside air to cool the compressed air, this is why a lot of racers use water-air intercoolers and use an ice chest full of ice and water to supply the intercooler with constantly cold water
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 03:08 PM   #18 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...I've seen after-market "add-on" misting systems that proport to cool the air by XX-degrees, but their performance is dependant upon atmospherics (alt, RH, Temp, etc.) and amount of water available (determines "ON" time duration).
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 08:28 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Alien Observer
 
suspectnumber961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I flitter here and there
Posts: 547

highcountryexplorer - '86 Nissan 720 KC 4x4 ST with fiberglass cap
90 day: 21.78 mpg (US)

Elroy - '03 Ford Focus ZX3 w/Zetec DOHC engine
90 day: 32.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 78 Times in 65 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joenavy85 View Post
different cars react differently. my Jeep likes the intake temp between 100F and 110F, where as my girlfriends Ford Focus runs best 110F to 120F. my Jeep starts knocking around 120F, but her focus doesn't knock until around 140F-145F. i can't say for sure what the MPG gain is on either since i haven't done any testing, but my jeep gets better mileage to and from work tank to tank now (about 2 mpg better, 12 mile commute each way)
WAI for the Ford Focus?

from another forum...

"pull off the engine snorkle, it will suck in hot air from the engine bay. hot air will mean less air in the combustion chamber. i saw about a 4 mpg difference on the highway."

He's talking about removing the intake hose from the bottom of the airbox.

__________________
Carry on humans...we are extremely proud of you. ..................

Forty-six percent of Americans believe in the creationist view that God created humans in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years. GALLUP POLL
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com