Quote:
Originally Posted by JQmile
I found this on the web, and we all know the internet wouldn't lie to us
Looks like I was a little off, probably because I didn't factor in any rolling resistance.
"Among commercially available 1984 model street cars, the most aerodynamically efficient was the Audi 5000S, with a Cd of 0.33. The Chevrolet Corvette was close behind with a Cd of 0.34. Most other street models have approximate values of 0.40 (my wife's Chevrolet Chevette, I have discovered, is at the high end of the spectrum with 0.45)."
Mine's an '82, but you get the gist of its aero properties. They're bad. Nosecone maybe??
|
JQ,don't know if you're still out there but I scrounged up some old numbers on the Chevette.These are for the 1982 Euro version:
Cd 0.51
Frontal area 18.6 square-feet
Curb Weight 2,050 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Car and Driver did a road test comparison between a gasoline Chevette and Diesel Rabbit.Here are numbers for Chevy:
30-mph= 40 mpg
40-mph= 37.5 mpg
50-mph= 33 mpg
60-mph= 28 mpg
70-mph= 22 mpg
80-mph= 17.5 mpg
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- None of the road tests included top speed.Chevy's competitor,the 1982 Ford Escort was tested flat out at 87 mph.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OPEL Junior concept car of the 1980s would be a good car to mimic with the Chevette.It achieved Cd 0.30 with a remarkably short overall car length.