Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-21-2012, 12:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Wannabe
 
tiderfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 32

BlueBenz - '05 Mercedes-Benz W203 (C230) 6 Speed Kompressor Sport
90 day: 16.17 mpg (US)

Grendel - '95 Ford F150 Cobra
90 day: 12.63 mpg (US)

Boris - '02 Ford ZX-2 16V zetec
90 day: 27.95 mpg (US)

Opel - '08 Opel/Saturn Astra XE
90 day: 26.34 mpg (US)

Nancy - '00 BMW 528iT Touring Manual
90 day: 19.92 mpg (US)

Caty - '07 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 25.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Calculating mileage with new tires (MATH!)

Greetings, I have changed the rims of my ZX2. I know the new tires are slightly less in diameter. They are from a 2004 Miata. I want to know how to adjust my mileage to account for the faster tires. Here are the stats:


Stock Tire - 185/60R15
Section Width: 7.28 in 185 mm
Rim Diameter: 15 in 381 mm
Rim Width Range: 5 - 6.5 in
Overall Diameter: 23.74 in 602.99 mm
Sidewall Height: 4.37 in 110.99 mm
Radius: 11.87 in 301.49 mm
Circumference: 74.58 in 1894.3 mm
Revs per Mile: 876.1
Actual Speed: 60 mph 100 km/h

NEW Tire - 205/50R16
Section Width: 8.07 in 205 mm
Rim Diameter: 16 in 406.4 mm
Rim Width Range: 5.5 - 7.5 in
Overall Diameter: 24.07 in 611.37 mm
Sidewall Height: 4.03 in 102.36 mm
Radius: 12.03 in 305.56 mm
Circumference: 75.61 in 1920.4 mm
Revs per Mile: 864.1
Speedometer1: 59.1 mph 98.6 km/h

Speedometer Difference: - Speedometer Difference: 1.388% too slow
Diameter Difference: - Diameter Difference: 1.38%

So do I just divide miles traveled by 1.388%

My last tank was 294.7 miles. When I divide that by 1.388, I get 212miles. That seems way too low.

Any thoughts?

__________________



Matt|ttaM
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-21-2012, 12:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oakton, VA
Posts: 189
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Multiply miles traveled by (24.07/23.74)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 12:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
tortoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 71

number 9 - '89 Geo Metro LSi
90 day: 49.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiderfish View Post
I know the new tires are slightly less in diameter.

Stock Tire - 185/60R15
Radius: 11.87 in 301.49 mm


NEW Tire - 205/50R16
Radius: 12.03 in 305.56 mm
To start with you show the new tire as larger in diameter. When we straighten that out, we can go on from there.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 12:35 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Wannabe
 
tiderfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 32

BlueBenz - '05 Mercedes-Benz W203 (C230) 6 Speed Kompressor Sport
90 day: 16.17 mpg (US)

Grendel - '95 Ford F150 Cobra
90 day: 12.63 mpg (US)

Boris - '02 Ford ZX-2 16V zetec
90 day: 27.95 mpg (US)

Opel - '08 Opel/Saturn Astra XE
90 day: 26.34 mpg (US)

Nancy - '00 BMW 528iT Touring Manual
90 day: 19.92 mpg (US)

Caty - '07 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 25.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks for the quick reply.

So it goes:
Odometer Miles: * (24.07/23.74) = Adjusted Miles / Gallons used = Adjusted MPG
294.7 Miles on ODO * (1.0139) = 298.8 Miles / 9.87 Gallons = 30.27 Adjusted MPG


Is this correct? If so it's great. I can't believe I got that good of mileage, since I have been driving a lot of stop and go.
__________________



Matt|ttaM
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 12:48 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
tortoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 71

number 9 - '89 Geo Metro LSi
90 day: 49.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDarwin View Post
Multiply miles traveled by (24.07/23.74)
You mean multiply miles indicated on odometer?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 01:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
You must measure actual miles driven somehow -- the easiest way is to drive on a highway that has markers every 10th of a mile, and reset the Trip (B?) odometer at an even mile marker. Drive for at least 20 miles (as far as you can) and compare the Trip odometer to the measured distance. Add (or subtract) a percentage to the Trip odometer to get you close to the measured distance; erring on the conservative side.

For example, if you drove 25 measured miles, and the trip odometer only read 23.8 miles, you need to add 5% to get to 24.99 miles.

Another way to measure the actual distance you drive is use a GPS, though this sometimes doesn't account for elevation changes and might be off a bit. A third way to measure the actual distance is to use Google maps for directions to go between 2 points, and then drive that specific route, and measure it on the trip odometer.

You cannot depend on specs of the tires as the tire may be worn, or you may be running them at a higher pressure, etc.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 01:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
...You cannot depend on specs of the tires as the tire may be worn, or you may be running them at a higher pressure, etc.
...another caveat to be aware of is that *if/when* you attempt to mathematically calculate the distance traveled during each tire rotation -- because of tire deflection (roughly about 0.97) under load -- you'll aways end-up getting a number that's slightly too high. In fact, even the 0.97 number is only a rough approximation, which varies somewhat with manufacturer, tire construction, tire diameter, tire loading, tire inflation pressure and tire temperature.

...you can visualize this tire deflection as the slight "flat spot" you see where the tire is in contact with the pavement.

Last edited by gone-ot; 05-21-2012 at 01:34 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 02:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Wannabe
 
tiderfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 32

BlueBenz - '05 Mercedes-Benz W203 (C230) 6 Speed Kompressor Sport
90 day: 16.17 mpg (US)

Grendel - '95 Ford F150 Cobra
90 day: 12.63 mpg (US)

Boris - '02 Ford ZX-2 16V zetec
90 day: 27.95 mpg (US)

Opel - '08 Opel/Saturn Astra XE
90 day: 26.34 mpg (US)

Nancy - '00 BMW 528iT Touring Manual
90 day: 19.92 mpg (US)

Caty - '07 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 25.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
All good points. I thank you for bringing them up. I will try to get some real-world numbers using Google maps, and my gps. I have several Android apps that will track distances, but I never considered it may not account for elevation changes. I know the one called My Tracks by Google will tell you the elevation change, but I am not sure if it relates to distance traveled.
__________________



Matt|ttaM
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 02:19 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Wannabe
 
tiderfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 32

BlueBenz - '05 Mercedes-Benz W203 (C230) 6 Speed Kompressor Sport
90 day: 16.17 mpg (US)

Grendel - '95 Ford F150 Cobra
90 day: 12.63 mpg (US)

Boris - '02 Ford ZX-2 16V zetec
90 day: 27.95 mpg (US)

Opel - '08 Opel/Saturn Astra XE
90 day: 26.34 mpg (US)

Nancy - '00 BMW 528iT Touring Manual
90 day: 19.92 mpg (US)

Caty - '07 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 25.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiderfish View Post
Thanks for the quick reply.
Odometer Miles: * (24.07/23.74) = Adjusted Miles / Gallons used = Adjusted MPG
294.7 Miles on ODO * (1.0139) = 298.8 Miles / 9.87 Gallons = 30.27 Adjusted MPG
Just to tide me over, are my above calculations correct? At least in a idealized world?
__________________



Matt|ttaM
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 02:49 PM   #10 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
tire vs. MPH GUIDELINE:

...a LARGER diameter tire will UNDER report odometer distance and MPH, so the "correction" is to multiply by number greater than 1.0:1.

...a SMALLER diameter tire will OVER report odometer distance and MPH, so the "correction" is to multiply by a number less than 1.0:1.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com