Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-12-2011, 10:02 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Cast iron block instead of aluminum

Green Car Congress: New 3-cylinder, 1.0-liter Ford EcoBoost engine to debut in European Focus range

1.0 Ford ecoboost 3 cylinder. Perfect for a Hydraulic Hybrid.

regards
Mech

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-13-2011, 12:07 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
Quote:
unlike the larger EcoBoost engines—cast iron has been selected for the block, reducing the amount of energy needed for warm-up by up to 50% compared with aluminum.
I wonder how the weight of the cast iron block compares to aluminum, I would think that with modern casting and modern alloys that they might not be that heavy, just like steel bike frames can weigh about the same as aluminum because aluminum can not flex very much without cracking.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 01:11 AM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I like plain ol' cast iron blocks: simple, inexpensive, and cast iron is the best cylinder surface. When done right whatever weight penalty there may be is offset by the benefits.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 06:00 AM   #4 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
In the old small block chevy the aluminum version was a full 100lb lighter than the cast iron ones.
The difference between cast iron and aluminum blocks in the newer engines is about 70-80lb.
With 4 cylinder engines I would expect the weight difference between cast iron and aluminum to be about half that.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 06:49 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
It's a 3 cylinder. I think the Kubota D600 was about 135 pounds. Bet this is lighter and cast iron absorbs heat at a much lower rate than aluminum.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 09:36 AM   #6 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
They will produce an aluminum version at some point I bet.
That way they can call it "new" again.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 09:51 AM   #7 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
I know the guys up north have problems with keeping their Insights warm in winter. The small aluminum block coupled with oversized grills, low coolant volume and autostop make for coolant temperatures that are all over the place.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 10:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
With the size of a 3 cylinder 1.0L engine, cast iron would be a lot easier and cheaper with little weight penalty . With aluminum block manufacture cost are a lot more as to get strong block you need to encapsulate the main bearings bridge ,unlike cast iron which is fine with bearing saddles .

Only issue with cast iron block is dissimilar metal one with head being aluminum and rate of expansion being different , possibly head gasket issues down the road .
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 10:54 AM   #9 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
The Aluminium Rover V8 (ex-Buick) is a common conversion for MGB GTs like the one I have, and even in the enlarged 4.6 litre version (original is only 3.5) they weigh less than the original 1.8 B-series boat anchor.

Must get out in the garage some time...
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 01:19 PM   #10 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
The big advantage of cast iron is less heat loss to the coolant as it doesn't conduct heat as well as aluminum. This keeps more heat in the combustion gasses and allows you to extract more power. The down side is it makes it harder to pass Nox emissions.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com