Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-30-2020, 05:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Florida
Posts: 1
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Changing to a different tire size

The stock tire size on my 2014 CR-V is 215/70r16. If I replaced all 4 tires with 215/70r16 in the front and 205/70r16 in the rear, would it throw off my speedometer even though my car is front wheel drive and I kept the same diameter in the front? Would there be any issues that would arise from this?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-30-2020, 09:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,948

Gaptooth (retired) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.26 mpg (US)

Such Fit - '07 Honda Fit Sport
90 day: 41.27 mpg (US)

Connect - '15 Ford Transit Connect XL
90 day: 23.78 mpg (US)

K-sight - '00 Honda K-sight
Team Honda
90 day: 42.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,705
Thanked 1,669 Times in 1,065 Posts
There's a remote chance you could have issues with the ABS system seeing a mis-match between front and rear wheel speeds, but likely it will be fine. I'm fairly certain the speedometer is driven off of 3rd gear in the transmission, so your speedometer will be fine.

Why that combination in tire size?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
jland (07-01-2020)
Old 07-02-2020, 08:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 740
Thanks: 1
Thanked 333 Times in 206 Posts
This is a bad idea. You're making the vehicle more prone to spin outs as the rear is going to be less predictable under severe handling (exactly when you don't want that to happen!)

What were you hoping to accomplish? Better fuel economy? Tire size is a small player compared to the affect make and model of the tire have. So spend your time researching tire brands.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2020, 05:49 PM   #4 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 7,942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 857 Times in 761 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
You're making the vehicle more prone to spin outs as the rear is going to be less predictable under severe handling (exactly when you don't want that to happen!)
Considering some Asian vans and compact trucks used to have mismatching front and rear wheels, even though they resort to dual rear wheels, I wouldn't be much concerned about such unpredictability.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2020, 08:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
EV convert
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 8,663

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 210
Thanked 2,858 Times in 2,235 Posts
I put the spare on the back of my leaf and it feels a little twitchy. But that's like a 145mm wide tire.
I don't think you will be able to tell the difference between a 215 on the front and a 205 on the back.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2020, 07:54 AM   #6 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 740
Thanks: 1
Thanked 333 Times in 206 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Considering some Asian vans and compact trucks used to have mismatching front and rear wheels, even though they resort to dual rear wheels, I wouldn't be much concerned about such unpredictability.
The problem here is that the more unstable tires would be on the rear where what you cited, they are all on the front. Besides, this is an SUV and I'm not sure we want to be making an SUV more unstable.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
  Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:54 AM   #7 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 7,942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 857 Times in 761 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
Besides, this is an SUV and I'm not sure we want to be making an SUV more unstable.
It's just a 10mm difference, doesn't seem so likely to be too troublesome.
  Reply With Quote
Old Today, 02:20 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 16,032
Thanks: 4,200
Thanked 5,391 Times in 4,292 Posts
The only situation I recall seeing staggered tire sizes on a FWD car was drag racing Rabbits.

Low wide 13s on the front, and tall narrow 15s on the back. It appeared that matching the contact patch size was the goal.

215/70r16 in the front and 205/[75-80]r16 in the rear?

__________________
.

If you don't make stuff, there is no stuff

_________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com