12-15-2009, 12:33 AM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Yep, the 6G73 and the 2.5 MPFI are the engines I was referring to.
If I had to choose one, I'd frankly rather have the V6 mated to turbo gears.
The V6 will inherently make more torque because of a smoother revolution with more power strokes, but use the same amount of fuel per revolution due to displacement. (There are variables, but I don't really care...)
Mated to the turbo gears, which are longer than snot trails from quick snails, and a nice, long overdrive at the end, you could easily take a 2200# car down the highway at 60-65 MPH just off idle. (Like 1k-1.2k RPM.) The 2.5 I4 can also do that, but I think where the V6 would really shine is during acceleration, where it's higher torque/RPM value could really be exploited for the best acceleration for the least fuel.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2009, 12:38 AM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
|
Tricky you are.
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2009, 12:40 AM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Why do you say that?
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2009, 12:50 AM
|
#54 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
Why do you say that?
|
Didn't mean anything by it. You didn't say anything about the transmission in the first post. |
|
|
|
|
12-15-2009, 12:53 AM
|
#55 (permalink)
|
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadisonMPG
Didn't mean anything by it. You didn't say anything about the transmission in the first post.
|
I only used the transmission identification to qualify my choice. If the gears were fixed, it would depend wholly on the gear ratios as to which I would rather have, because one would be closer to an efficient range than the other with different gears.
Vehicle weight, of course, I chose 2200 LBS because I'm pretty sure the vehicles that have both of those engines weight right in around there. (Haven't looked it up, just a guess.)
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2009, 04:05 AM
|
#56 (permalink)
|
|
75mpg or bust
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grants Pass and Medford Oregon
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
My personal pick would be a 1999-2001 Honda Insight 5 speed. With a 71 mpg EPA rating, I'm sure some of us here could hit 100mpg without any mods at all.
I'm also very happy with my 1997 Toyota Tercel. The 95-99s were the most powerful AND efficient, and they last almost forever.
If you want a brand new car, the only ones I would even consider are the Honda Fit or Toyota Yaris. Just my 2.2 cents.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2009, 01:14 PM
|
#57 (permalink)
|
|
Grasshopper
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 964
Thanks: 25
Thanked 30 Times in 25 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5EFE
My personal pick would be a 1999-2001 Honda Insight 5 speed. With a 71 mpg EPA rating, I'm sure some of us here could hit 100mpg without any mods at all.
|
i dont think thats happened yet
Last edited by alohaspirit; 12-17-2009 at 12:03 AM..
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2009, 01:33 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Quote:
|
i dont think thats happened yet
|
It has.
Depending on how extreme* you're willing to take your driving, you can squeeze well over 100 mpg (US) from an unmodified 1st gen 5-speed Insight.
(* by extreme, I mean relatively slow, and using pulse & glide almost exclusively.)
Edit: not just talking about individual "segments" or trips, but whole tanks. |
|
|
|
|
12-16-2009, 09:22 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
|
|
Left Lane Ecodriver
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
|
These folks squeezed out 164mpg in a virtually unmodified insight, in what can only be called "incredibly impractical driving".
The Insight Marathon 2006 -- World Record 2,254.4 miles on one tank of fuel - CleanMPG Forums
The original EPA city/highway rating on the 2000 Insight was 61/70, which has been revised to 49/61. I figure if you just jump in it and drive the speed limit, you'll get in the 60's in real world driving. |
|
|
|
|
12-17-2009, 12:05 AM
|
#60 (permalink)
|
|
Grasshopper
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 964
Thanks: 25
Thanked 30 Times in 25 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alohaspirit
i dont think thats happened yet
|
lol, i always have to clarify
just like him, i meant through normal (ecomodder) driving
theres actually quite a few cars that hit 100mpg with "contest" driving techniques
|
|
|
|
|
Past 
Present 
Future?
