Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-17-2018, 12:28 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,844
Thanks: 50
Thanked 2,553 Times in 1,788 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by svt98t View Post
I'm really looking into improving the aero on the front of the car.
Everyone in the forum is going to tell you that the vast majority of drag reduction will happen on the latter half of the vehicle.

And they will be right.

Gotta start somewhere, I usually start at the front myself but it's a bad habit.

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-18-2018), svt98t (07-17-2018)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-17-2018, 03:34 PM   #12 (permalink)
Neutral is my favorite
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Niagara Falls, NY
Posts: 221

The Black Pearl - '03 Mercury Marauder 300A
Team Panther

Land Yacht - '08 Lincoln Navigator L Ultimate
90 day: 15.89 mpg (US)

Tank of Justice III - '97 Ford Crown Victoria HPP
Team Panther
90 day: 22.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 61 Times in 51 Posts
Thanks for the heads up.
Wait until you see what I have in store for the back end....


-ryan s.
__________________
1997 Ford Crown Victoria HPP- "Tank of Justice III" 193k - 578.9 miles on ONE tank
2003 Mercury Marauder- 61k, not so fuel efficient; #1,548 of 11,052
2008 Lincoln Navigator L - 186k (don't ask about mpg)

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to svt98t For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-18-2018)
Old 07-17-2018, 03:36 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 19,736
Thanks: 5,538
Thanked 6,483 Times in 5,214 Posts
You're not wrong. OTOH, the back half is dependent on the front half, witness the 911 with a spoiler [but] without an airdam.

Cross-post. Standing by.
__________________
.
Conclussion: a realization that smacks you upside the head
_________________

"Anything is a smoke machine if you use it wrong enough" --AvE
_________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-18-2018)
Old 07-19-2018, 06:56 AM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 734 Times in 554 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by svt98t View Post
Hey folks,
I want to pick your brains a little.
First, I recently hit my best mileage ever, at 567.1 miles on one tank of gas in 97 Crown Vic (On a trip to Indy from NY).
I was so excited about it, that I thought about it a ton, and that I couldn't wait to get home and get the next mods done.
I had a lower grille block made from sheet aluminum from my last car (93 Grand Marquis) that fits decently on the front.
I also had a Mach1 chin spoiler I really wanted to add.
So I installed both of these and now returned back to Indy again for work.

On my record setting trip, my low fuel light came on at 485.3 miles.
On this trip, it came on at 488.7 miles.
I know there's always a ton of variables, like the fact it was over 20 degrees warmer out on the second trip.

I expected these two mods to make a bit more of a difference.
However, I'm starting to think that the forward angle of the chin spoiler is actually killing my mileage and not helping as much as it should.

What say you EcoModders?
It's self-tapped in, and if needed, I will remove it for the trip back home to see if it makes a difference.

Thank you for the input.

-ryan s.







I think you need to not push towards the low fuel light. Plan your fuel stops at an estimated 75-80% of fuel tank capacity (maximum) at a conservative MPG number.

It will provide “better” results in that the decision about where to stop is made the night before. No last minute decisions (bad for highway attentiveness). Ingress & egress are mapped into and off property from your study of sat pics. . “Best” refuel is in the same direction of travel, and beyond an intersection leading to highway ramp.

To extend the game, do the same at the beginning. 45-miles or more from departure. Get warm-up out of the way (though tires take 1.5-hrs), and do the refuel again at the edge of a metro area (at destination).

Isolate the steady-state highway miles.

And count off the lane-changes, the acceleration & deceleration events. All of them.

I recommend you use cruise control for the most consistent results. Unless the area is roller coaster hills, it’s far more steady than we are. (It’s also how we counsel new truck drivers, “Let the computer run the drivetrain, you are there for steering & braking”).

Get yourself out of the way. In every aspect.

.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
svt98t (07-30-2018)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com