Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2011, 06:31 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,246
Thanks: 24,379
Thanked 7,358 Times in 4,758 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
I'm puzzled because the smooth wheels helped the drag yet the spat did nothing for the drag.

It sounds as if you mean that the front airdam keeps air from colliding with the tire, spoiling an opportunity for the spat to function, yet the wheel covers ( Moon discs ) functioned as they did, so plenty of air was getting to that area.
Without the wheel being even with the outer edge of the spat,the forward face of the spat is being attacked by the airstream.It may have a local Cd as high as 1.11 right there,with full separation,and turbulence following it far down the rocker area.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-29-2011, 02:42 PM   #22 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 111

WorkHorse - '88 Ford F150 XL
90 day: 13.5 mpg (US)

DailyBeater - '93 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
90 day: 39.37 mpg (US)

The ST - '13 Ford Focus ST
90 day: 26.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Ok, ive still got the first chin spoiler we made, and could finish it up and install it to try out, but now I have a question. What would be better, chin spoiler and tire spats, or do a front underbody tray from the bumper to the front suspension and then some spats along with that? If the tray would be better I wouldnt have to worry about the ground clearance but then again I can make the spoiler a bit higher to deal with it if needed. I appreciate any advice!
Matt
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 07:05 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,246
Thanks: 24,379
Thanked 7,358 Times in 4,758 Posts
that

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Like that boxy yet sleek old Lexus sedan, whatever that was.
would that be the '89 LS 400,@ Cd 0.29?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 07:11 PM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,246
Thanks: 24,379
Thanked 7,358 Times in 4,758 Posts
I am dyslexic

Quote:
Originally Posted by tru View Post
I think ur confused, as was i on first inspection. the spat is on the front side upstream on the rear tires.
tru,it just hit me that I was interpreting the airflow from left to right which would make the tail the nose!
Good grief!
My apology to all.
Is this the Camaro with the aluminum nose which is completely sealed?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2011, 07:17 PM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,246
Thanks: 24,379
Thanked 7,358 Times in 4,758 Posts
there's a good reason you're puzzled,it's my stupidity!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
I'm puzzled because the smooth wheels helped the drag yet the spat did nothing for the drag.

It sounds as if you mean that the front airdam keeps air from colliding with the tire, spoiling an opportunity for the spat to function, yet the wheel covers ( Moon discs ) functioned as they did, so plenty of air was getting to that area.
Cd,I just realized I've been dyslexic on this whole thread.
My brain was interpreting the image with airflow from the left to right.
tru tried to set me right and it went right over my head.
Is this the Camaro with the aluminum nose which extends to almost ground level?
I need to know exactly which car this is.I apologize for the mix-up.( you guys need to keep a close eye on me!).
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 11:50 AM   #26 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 111

WorkHorse - '88 Ford F150 XL
90 day: 13.5 mpg (US)

DailyBeater - '93 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
90 day: 39.37 mpg (US)

The ST - '13 Ford Focus ST
90 day: 26.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 66sprint6 View Post
Ok, ive still got the first chin spoiler we made, and could finish it up and install it to try out, but now I have a question. What would be better, chin spoiler and tire spats, or do a front underbody tray from the bumper to the front suspension and then some spats along with that? If the tray would be better I wouldnt have to worry about the ground clearance but then again I can make the spoiler a bit higher to deal with it if needed. I appreciate any advice!
Matt
Im workin on a 93 Escort, not the salt flat camaro, please refer to question asked above and keep posts on topic.
Thanks
Matt
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 07:13 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,246
Thanks: 24,379
Thanked 7,358 Times in 4,758 Posts
Escort

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66sprint6 View Post
Im workin on a 93 Escort, not the salt flat camaro, please refer to question asked above and keep posts on topic.
Thanks
Matt
Matt,I would recommend you do the front airdam first.I didn't find a photo of your chin spoiler.Did I miss a link?
Today's NASCAR noses( without the splitter) would be a good example for a nose remodel for healthy airflow if you wanted to take it that far.The lower portion could be a flexible material to deal with curbs and parking hazards.
After that you could appraise your situation and go from there.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 12:26 PM   #28 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 111

WorkHorse - '88 Ford F150 XL
90 day: 13.5 mpg (US)

DailyBeater - '93 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
90 day: 39.37 mpg (US)

The ST - '13 Ford Focus ST
90 day: 26.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks! I didnt take a pic, it was too dark and we never finished it. I believe we will reuse the brackets and run somethin more flexible like what you stated, maybe some garden edging or similar. I got to thinking about the underbody pan, but if you look at the front of my car, there is alot of "ugly" that sticks out below the bottom of the front bumper so my belly pan would have to come down abruptly, then smooth out in order to cover it all up. A front splitter or apron would cover it...then maybe make a pan connected to it? I need new struts for this thing so Im thinkin bout loweing it an inch or two as well down the road.

Heres a picture of the "ugly" under the bumper.



Matt
__________________

Last edited by 66sprint6; 12-01-2011 at 12:34 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 66sprint6 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-18-2014)
Old 12-01-2011, 03:17 PM   #29 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Today's NASCAR noses( without the splitter) would be a good example for a nose remodel for healthy airflow if you wanted to take it that far.The lower portion could be a flexible material to deal with curbs and parking hazards.
Perhaps like this:
http://media.scenedaily.com/images/5...r-Nascar-2.jpg

james
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2011, 08:42 PM   #30 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
would that be the '89 LS 400,@ Cd 0.29?
That car had a Cd of .29 was tweaked further to .28 and finally .27 in series III trim
Source : Lexus LS400






The next generation LS430 had an even lower Cd of .26, and .25 with optional air suspension, which lowered the car around an inch.



Despite LOOKING sleeker, the current generation ls460 is also .26
( I suspect the wheels have to do with the higher drag )

Sources :
LS | Detailed Specifications



LS430 :



LS460 :


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-18-2014)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com