Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-29-2009, 12:11 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
puddleglum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 421

Rondo - '07 Kia Rondo EX
Last 3: 20.47 mpg (US)

Tinkertoy2 - '00 Toyota Echo base
Team Toyota
Last 3: 46.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 96 Times in 69 Posts
Does air density also change with humidity like it does with temp. or is it not an issue. E.G. would air be substaintially denser in fog than a dry sunny day?
Is there any rule of thumb for the change in rolling resistance relating to temp. or is it dependant on the vehicle?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-29-2009, 01:53 AM   #12 (permalink)
Ernie Rogers
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pleasant Grove, Utah
Posts: 133
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 12 Posts
Fog and humidity have little effect

Quote:
Originally Posted by puddleglum View Post
Does air density also change with humidity like it does with temp. or is it not an issue. E.G. would air be substaintially denser in fog than a dry sunny day?
Is there any rule of thumb for the change in rolling resistance relating to temp. or is it dependant on the vehicle?
Hello, Puddlegum,

I am checking in a handbook for you (Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press). At 95 deg F, here are the air densities at sea level--

Dry air at 95 F.........1.146 kg /cu.m.
100% humid air........1.122 kg /cu.m.

That's a density decrease of two percent. Suppose you are driving at a speed where 70% of the energy is used to oppose air drag. Then, a 50 mpg in dry air becomes---

50 x (0.7/0.98 + 0.3) = 50.7 mpg in 100% humidity and 95 F

At 70 deg F, the moisture content in humid air has less effect--

Dry air at 70 F.........1.201 kg /cu.m.
100% humid air........1.190 kg /cu.m. This is 1% less

Effect of greater density of cool air--

50 x 1.146 /1.201 = 47.7 mpg.

Effect of raising humidity from zero to 100%--

47.7 x (0.7/0.99 + .3) = 48.0 at 100% humidity and 70 F

If you lower the temperature another 25 degrees to 45 F, the effect of humidity drops to about 1/2%. (Air density rises to 1.226, a bigger effect.)

The effect of fog is to lower fuel economy, partially cancelling the effect of high humidity. The fog effect is smaller, so forget it.

I hope that puts your mind at ease.

Ernie Rogers
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2013, 03:14 PM   #13 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,244

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 259
Thanked 803 Times in 391 Posts
I did today some coasting testing.
Temperature was +17 celsius so RHO~1,2176

120-80km/h north avg time 36,92s south 36,11s--> total avg 36,52s
40-20 km/h north avg time 65,18 south 75,68 --> total avg 70,43s
Frontal area is 1,8772 m2
weight 890 kg

Based on ernies formula

Cd=((M*a-crr*M*g)*2)/A*rho*V^2

What speed should I use or have I made a mistake in the formula?

Someone with computer skills should make similar exel sheet like this:
Drag Coefficient Calculation
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2013, 11:47 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
This is a better spreadsheet:

Measure the drag coefficient of your car

http://www.iwilltry.org/b/wp-content...oefficient.xls
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
mikeyjd (09-10-2013)
Old 09-02-2013, 01:03 PM   #15 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,244

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 259
Thanked 803 Times in 391 Posts
Yes that is good sheet but I should have looked that before made my measurements... Now I have to make new tests as I did not measure 70 seconds of data.

Also I have to try find better place to measure. its difficult in Finland to find level road that is long enough for this purpose.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2013, 01:42 PM   #16 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
To find air density (SI or IP), try this applet: Linric Company PsyCalc®
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2013, 04:35 PM   #17 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,244

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 259
Thanked 803 Times in 391 Posts
Cd 0.221 and Crr 0.0079 So I was able to reach same drag coffefficient as MB CLA blue efficiency model which has needed numerous hours in CFD, wind tunnel and big bugs. So I reached best production car Cd up to date with internet, books and tuft testing and virtually zero budget. I wonder what those figures would have been if I would have put all my coming innovations to this car?

__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vekke For This Useful Post:
wyatt (09-03-2013)
Old 09-03-2013, 08:32 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vekke View Post
Yes that is good sheet but I should have looked that before made my measurements... Now I have to make new tests as I did not measure 70 seconds of data.

Also I have to try find better place to measure. its difficult in Finland to find level road that is long enough for this purpose.
That is the challenge I had hear in New England, as well - straight, flat and level roads with little traffic where you can turn around at either end to make 3 runs in each direction, are very hard to find. Do it at night would help on the traffic front, at least.

And video recording the ScanGauge set to KPH makes the data collection relatively easy - just watch the video and start timing as you hit the target speed (70kph?) and then pause it every 10s and note the speed.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2013, 02:47 AM   #19 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,244

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 259
Thanked 803 Times in 391 Posts
Yes that was method I was using. I put the speed to 125 km/h and started coasting. put the zero mark to 120 km/h and then just pause every ten seconds. I yelled the speeds as I had previous day problems to read the numbers from ultragauge screen due to sunlight. Also in the last test other direction speeds were little hard to see.

__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com