Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-05-2010, 07:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Cold/Warm Air Intake

This is my buddy's 1991 Accord that he just got about 2 months ago

So far all we did to it fuel economy wise was seafoam it before an oil change then run it on Shell 91 octane and put this in

It definately has more throttle response and power, but after about the first week he actually said it started getting better MPG than before the filter

I was just wondering what you guys would consider this
A cold air or warm air or like a short ram?

I think it depends on the whether, but according to him it is running a little warmer
here's the car


Here's the intake system


it's pretty much just a cone filter in place of the stock airbox

__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)

Last edited by Domman56; 01-05-2010 at 07:26 PM.. Reason: Spelling
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-05-2010, 07:56 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 516

B2300 - '96 Mazda B2300 SE

Focus - '05 Ford Focus ST

The red car - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 6
Thanked 77 Times in 56 Posts
It's warm air. The engine compartment is definitely warmer than ambient air temps. The stock system probably supplies cooler air to the throttle.

Also, it is not any sort of ram system. Ram means it uses the high air pressure in front of the car to ram a little extra air into the engine. At wide open throttle at 100 mph with a well designed ram air system you may see a couple of additional horsepower, but not much more than that. The biggest horsepower gain would really be from using the coolest air avialable.
__________________
Good design is simple. Getting there isn't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 10:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
I can attest right now that he's losing power by adding that filter there.

If you don't believe me, dyno the car before and after, and then try to explain the results.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 12:10 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
I can attest right now that he's losing power by adding that filter there.

If you don't believe me, dyno the car before and after, and then try to explain the results.
well i believe the reason it feels more powerful is not neccesarily POWER but it has great throttle response and that usually can be mistaken for power

but I dynoed my other friends 94 accord sedan and it gained 3 HP on the dyno This is because it was before after with the hood up and i don't know that the hood up with a fan at the engine is very accurate
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 12:33 AM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
You have dyno access? Sweet! What all have ya done on it?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 12:41 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
You have dyno access? Sweet! What all have ya done on it?
Yeah there's a dyno at my college's autoshop out here We've only done a few dyno runs on it though you have to be in autoshop to bring a car into the dyno
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 12:43 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
But this is a warm air intake for sure right guys? that would explain the extra mileage
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 01:25 AM   #8 (permalink)
wdb
lurker's apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942

PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab
90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
On the dyno, with the hood up and a huge fan blasting air at it, it's a performance enhancer. On the road, with the hood down and the engine heat trapped in the vicinity of the intake, it's a warm air intake. Quicker throttle response is usually noticed, but that is not the same as actual on-road power improvement.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 01:52 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdb View Post
On the dyno, with the hood up and a huge fan blasting air at it, it's a performance enhancer. On the road, with the hood down and the engine heat trapped in the vicinity of the intake, it's a warm air intake. Quicker throttle response is usually noticed, but that is not the same as actual on-road power improvement.

Oh definately but it did at least have a fan on both Before and After runs
So they were in the same testing environment

Yeah i know sound does alot for performance for most young people haha. get your kid a loud muffler and an intake and they should get a bit less speeding tickets cause they THINK they're going fast haha
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 02:29 AM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758

oldscoob - '87 subaru wagon gl/dr
90 day: 47.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by beatr911 View Post
It's warm air. The engine compartment is definitely warmer than ambient air temps. The stock system probably supplies cooler air to the throttle.

Also, it is not any sort of ram system. Ram means it uses the high air pressure in front of the car to ram a little extra air into the engine. At wide open throttle at 100 mph with a well designed ram air system you may see a couple of additional horsepower, but not much more than that. The biggest horsepower gain would really be from using the coolest air avialable.
definately, get the air outside. It should be dramatic enough to reset the ecu, the battery, or however you do it.
I am learning now, even on a 23 year old carb little engine, it needed cold air
at all times, all temps...I feel rather silly about it. It is like I shrunk to a shrinking engine, and kept going the wrong direction. Anyway...outside air, big plastic tube, inert, as much as possible. It may pretend to be colder, it may pretend alot of things guages can't tell..just do it.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparing Warm Air Intakes (WAI) & Cold Air Intakes (CAI) toomuch EcoModding Central 27 11-20-2022 05:24 PM
start to play with IAT sensor on Mercedes E250D-Turbo 98' poisas EcoModding Central 6 10-07-2013 05:13 PM
Hot Air intake vs. Cold Air... why or why not? Blister General Efficiency Discussion 3 10-09-2008 11:01 AM
Grill block affected milleage mar5ka Aerodynamics 24 08-31-2008 11:17 AM
Moving air intake into the engine compartment? pasadena_commut Aerodynamics 5 07-25-2008 04:24 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com