Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2012, 02:57 PM   #21 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
The O2 sensor operates on Lamba so you use the same AFR values as Gasoline. The true AFR values are different but the O2 is just feeding converted values for Gasoline.

That's interesting about the conversion. I'm looking to do that once I get up and running.

__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-18-2012, 05:19 PM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Yeah. My main concern is that my fuel delivery system won't be able to keep up enough flow of E85 to maintain the lambda settings. I'm thinking, though, that as long as I drive normal for street (nothing more than 200% load... which doesn't happen often for me anyway), I should be fine.

Of course, I'm also wanting to adjust my current tune to maximize the usefulness of E85. I have an expert in the field (my car + E85 + tuning) whom I will want to consult, but I might also see if some people here would mind helping me see if I can mimic an Atkinson-cycle for my engine at cruise loads.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 04:06 AM   #23 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
If you're looking at Atkinson cycle, that's a whole different topic. And we do have a discussion about that. I haven't checked on it lately though.

I still can't believe you're considering experimenting on a new car. If you're going to do it, get it tuned by an E85 guru. Don't risk your engine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
first, ethanol is lighter then gasoline, and injectors inject via volume, and stoich is normally measured by mass.
Ethanol is infact heavier than Gasoline. Being 33% oxygen makes it heavier and reduces it's energy density. It's also what makes it so energy efficient.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 05:10 PM   #24 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Risk is slim to none if one eases into it with increasingly stronger blends, noting any effects along the way.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 06:17 PM   #25 (permalink)
EtOH
 
Allch Chcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
If he keeps it in closed loop. The base map for Open loop is based on absolute values though.
__________________
-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 07:51 PM   #26 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Doesn't change a thing I said.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 08:39 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
Just start mixing already and log the results. Once down 100 miles top off with E85, first tank will be e20ish. Come next refill put in 8 gallons E0/10 top off with E85, calculate the E% and just keep on going. To really test if your fuel pump & injectors can keep up you'll need to do a run or 2 after it's adjusted the fuel ratio and can supply enough fuel. I'm guessing good to E50 after than might get a CEL.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 01:25 AM   #28 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6

ZR1-S10 - '96 Chevy S10 Pickup 2WD LS
90 day: 21.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've started trying stronger blends in my 96 4.3L S10 now too. I easing into it very slowly. Just filled up with E14 I'll let you know how it goes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 04:20 PM   #29 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Wild Rose, WI
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use to run E85 in my 1994 Ford Aspire.
As long as the price difference was 62 cents or greater it was worth it.
I dropped 6-8mpg running with it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 08:11 PM   #30 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6

ZR1-S10 - '96 Chevy S10 Pickup 2WD LS
90 day: 21.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well one day in with a scan tool.

My live data shows VS 87 octane "winter tune"

Closed Loop
Coolent temp 165* F
IAT 79* F
Timing adv. ranges from -42.5 noload to +10 WOT
Short Term Fuel Trim -5 to Long Term Fuel Trim +16


It will be some time before I get cal. a difference in mileage

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com