08-26-2008, 07:35 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 262
Tracy - '00 vauxhall corsa
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
could we estimate the gains expected from mods
hi
it seems to me there are loads of great mods on this site that we can do that will increase FE. they are listed on different stickys in the sections. however we have no idea what kind of gains to expect from these mods and so we cant plan ahead effectively.
could we estimate the gains expected from mods and list them next to the mods in the sticky threads? i know all cars are different but something must be possible?
__________________
Nissan Leaf 24kwh. Average FE = 300mpg 3.6miles/kwh (@plug)
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-26-2008, 10:36 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Hi-Tech Redneck
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 1,436
Thanks: 6
Thanked 49 Times in 42 Posts
|
If I were to estimate all my Metro mods, it would probable equal out to 1-3 MPG increase on each item I did. Tire inflation would be a definate 3 MPG (or better) increase where the antenna reloction would be more like a 1 MPG increase.
It's really hard to say what the increases are because it takes time to notice them.
__________________
GeoMetroforum.com - got mpg?
|
|
|
08-27-2008, 07:01 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
ECO-Evolution
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482
Thanks: 17
Thanked 45 Times in 34 Posts
|
If the FE increase for the mods should be based on a percentage of gain. that way you can quantify it.
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."
|
|
|
08-27-2008, 08:27 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 262
Tracy - '00 vauxhall corsa
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
% from EPA?
__________________
Nissan Leaf 24kwh. Average FE = 300mpg 3.6miles/kwh (@plug)
|
|
|
08-27-2008, 10:30 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
There are too many variables to give specific percentage ranges IMO. The ranges of efficiency increase would be all over the place. For example, what good are rear wheel skirts if you are doing all city driving? Do we then qualify each mod with circumstances? 2 mpg @ 60 mph? This is just one example. I think the more we think about it, the more involved it will be.
I think maybe a better way is to generalize it a lot. For example, we have three ratings for a modification; efficiency increase, difficulty, and cost. From there we can rate each of those sections with a general rating of high, medium, low. Something like this would be more possible I think.
|
|
|
08-27-2008, 12:03 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,096
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
Daox, I agree. The same mod on two different cars in the same circumstance could even be all over the map. Generalization is the best you can do. I would recommend a fourth catagory: safety. Many of the suggestions here do increase your risk and need for awareness on the road.
|
|
|
08-27-2008, 03:34 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
estimate
Quote:
Originally Posted by modmonster
hi
it seems to me there are loads of great mods on this site that we can do that will increase FE. they are listed on different stickys in the sections. however we have no idea what kind of gains to expect from these mods and so we cant plan ahead effectively.
could we estimate the gains expected from mods and list them next to the mods in the sticky threads? i know all cars are different but something must be possible?
|
If you can find my installments,they will provide some quanta for which you can estimate.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
01-15-2010, 12:59 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 7
Scoop - '97 Subaru Outback 90 day: 30.92 mpg (US) EJ - '07 Suabru Outback 2.5i
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I saw a definite 2 MPG increase by increasing the tire pressure to 44 psi on both a '97 2.5 liter Subaru and a '96 2.2 liter Subaru, both are 5 spds. I still got more than 70k out of the tires, so I saw no adverse wear characteristics. Hope this helps.
Last edited by BArmstrong; 01-15-2010 at 01:00 AM..
Reason: whoops
|
|
|
01-15-2010, 02:13 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Live in Tucson AZ, work and car now in Detroit
Posts: 200
Thanks: 13
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
|
Can we make a sticky somewhere that points to all the A-B-A tests that anyone has done. That way someone can look through that list and link to page where the test was done. So someone looking for a grill block estimate can sort through all the A-B-A tests find the 2-3 "valid" tests come to their own conclusions. It would be a significant amount of work for someone.
|
|
|
01-15-2010, 09:32 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Hi-Tech Redneck
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 1,436
Thanks: 6
Thanked 49 Times in 42 Posts
|
No
__________________
GeoMetroforum.com - got mpg?
|
|
|
|