Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-02-2020, 12:35 PM   #51 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Joggernot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 430
Thanks: 1,436
Thanked 113 Times in 94 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michaelflat1 View Post
Oh that's not very good, i guess this could be changed using ECU and transmission remapping tools.

Perhaps in DFCO engine braking was too much, try without aircon maybe?
I don't use A/C, so this is without A/C.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-03-2020, 10:36 AM   #52 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 11,222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,393 Times in 1,241 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
Is there no L-mode like a conventional automatic?
No, there is nothing like that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2021, 09:46 AM   #53 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
CVTCivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 71

CVTCivic - '17 Honda Civic 4D Touring Sedan
90 day: 39.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 22 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cloowisa View Post
Considering pretty much the only reason for building CVT's is improved fuel economy, it sure is odd that they don't do DFCO as much as other transmission types
I don't think the Williams F1 team built a CVT in one of their F1 cars to get better fuel economy
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2021, 08:58 PM   #54 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 11,222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,393 Times in 1,241 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CVTCivic View Post
I don't think the Williams F1 team built a CVT in one of their F1 cars to get better fuel economy
I didn't even remember Williams had tested a CVT, yet I'm also not sure to which extent it would be so much of a good idea for Formula 1.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2021, 02:52 AM   #55 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
CVTCivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 71

CVTCivic - '17 Honda Civic 4D Touring Sedan
90 day: 39.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 22 Times in 15 Posts
Williams experimented with a CVT in the early 90s, but FIA banned it.

They did this to gain speed. While the car changes gears it looses speed. There is a good video about the CVT in the formula 1 car.

https://youtu.be/Sp228-39WhQ
__________________

Last edited by CVTCivic; 06-13-2021 at 07:31 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CVTCivic For This Useful Post:
RedDevil (06-13-2021), Xist (06-13-2021)
Old 06-13-2021, 03:57 PM   #56 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 11,222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,393 Times in 1,241 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CVTCivic View Post
They did this to gain speed.
I guess the software was substantially different from what we see on road-going vehicles, which tend to rely on the CVT to keep the RPM steadily within a narrower band.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2021, 07:24 PM   #57 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,474
Thanks: 195
Thanked 258 Times in 195 Posts
On a street car, you have to optimize for a number of different things. Sometimes power, sometimes torque, sometimes fuel economy, sometimes noise, and so on. Depending on how you control the CVT, you can run the engine somewhere near its peak of one of those things.

For a race car, you basically just want peak power. Which basically means running the engine at its peak power RPM, at least for a given throttle setting. A much simpler optimization problem, but at power levels that are almost certain to be pretty punishing for the hardware.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2021, 05:48 PM   #58 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 11,222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,393 Times in 1,241 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by some_other_dave View Post
A much simpler optimization problem
With pit-stops being part of the racing strategy, eventually having different modes at the very same CVT controller could be reasonable even for a racing application.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2022, 07:58 PM   #59 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: California
Posts: 477

2020 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H
Last 3: 18.4 mpg (US)

2021 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H
90 day: 17.08 mpg (US)

2022 - '08 chevy Tahoe LT
90 day: 17.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 100 Times in 92 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post


The last CVT I spent much time driving was the 1.2L, 3-cylinder Mirage pictured above.

I was genuinely impressed by how much it was programmed to pursue fuel economy: It tries its little heart out to keep cruising revs as low as possible (see chart).

I remembered being pleasantly surprised that...



That has me wondering: do CVT's programmed for such low RPM, fuel-saving operation offer fewer chances for zero fuel burn (DFCO) when releasing the throttle and coasting in gear? Seems possible you might only get a brief fuel cut before injection resumed to keep the engine running.

Other types of transmissions would have the engine at a higher RPM for a given road speed at the start of coasting. So, more time in fuel cut-off mode.

If that's the case, a CVT hypermiler might benefit from more neutral coasting.

Splitting hairs? Probably! These are the things that keep me awake at night.
i got a EVT transmission DFCO is a neutral like coasting No engine breaking the rpm goes to 1,000 too

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com