11-05-2016, 04:04 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 975
Thanks: 193
Thanked 312 Times in 221 Posts
|
While the structure may only weigh 300lbs, will it remain an empty tube for you to stand in while camping? It'll get a lot heavier pretty quick when you add you and whatever camping supplies.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-05-2016, 05:40 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Permanent Lurker
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Czechoslovakia (sort of), Europe
Posts: 348
Dáčenka - '10 Dacia / Renault Logan MCV 1.5 dCi (X90 k9k) 90 day: 47.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 198 Times in 92 Posts
|
Hi, i dont want to be a spoilfun, but my back-of-the-envelope calculation indicates that this structure has potential to flip over the car in relative wind speeds of around 100 km/h. So i would not recommend it.
|
|
|
11-05-2016, 08:43 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
11-05-2016, 11:55 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Permanent Lurker
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Czechoslovakia (sort of), Europe
Posts: 348
Dáčenka - '10 Dacia / Renault Logan MCV 1.5 dCi (X90 k9k) 90 day: 47.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 198 Times in 92 Posts
|
For others: it's Toppola what jakobnev posted. It offers standing place with small footprint. Visit http://www.toppola.com for more info.
To jakobnev: is it yours? How does it handle in crosswinds? Was your post meant as suggestion what to do instead rooftop whale, or as contradiction to my claim?
Last edited by seifrob; 11-05-2016 at 12:09 PM..
|
|
|
11-05-2016, 12:28 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
I don't have one myself, I was just trying to suggest a design that was a bit more sane.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
11-05-2016, 02:17 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by seifrob
Hi, i dont want to be a spoilfun, but my back-of-the-envelope calculation indicates that this structure has potential to flip over the car in relative wind speeds of around 100 km/h. So i would not recommend it.
|
I don't necessarily doubt you, but could you give me some insight into how you arrived at that? Keep in mind the Tesla Model S 90D is 4842 pounds curb weight and it is very bottom-heavy.
|
|
|
11-05-2016, 02:22 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Permanent Lurker
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Czechoslovakia (sort of), Europe
Posts: 348
Dáčenka - '10 Dacia / Renault Logan MCV 1.5 dCi (X90 k9k) 90 day: 47.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 129
Thanked 198 Times in 92 Posts
|
Aha, them i rise whole hand for toppola style. I only fear that one has to have some balls to remove hatch in - how much is for Tesla car??
If I remember right, some lady even made trip around the world in Saab and Toppola, so it definitely is viable proposal.
|
|
|
11-05-2016, 02:29 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vskid3
While the structure may only weigh 300lbs, will it remain an empty tube for you to stand in while camping? It'll get a lot heavier pretty quick when you add you and whatever camping supplies.
|
I'm making the seats/tables from the same carbon fiber sandwich panel I'll be using for the structure, so that weight would be negligible. Luckily a lot of camping supplies are designed for the new "ultralight backpacking" fad so there's many things like sleeping bags/pillows that would hardly add any weight at all. I'd be piping the heat/AC in from the Tesla via some flexible ducting when needed, and any occasional-use appliances would probably be stored in the Tesla's frunk.
One of the main reasons I don't want a collapsible tent is that they all suck for insulation. I actually have a stash of vacuum insulated panels which are an inch thick and R-40 but they can only be mounted on a rigid structure.
|
|
|
11-05-2016, 05:09 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
overhang
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigChief
Hey All, I'm attempting to design a rigid rooftop camper tent that will be permanently mounted to the roof of a Tesla Model S. This is going to be an around 7-foot diameter tube (I want it to be standing height inside) and 20 feet long so there's no overhang on the sides and about a foot and a half of overhang at the front and rear of the vehicle.
Here's a concept picture here, I used a plane fuselage model since that gets the idea across: imgur.com/BhKIclp
I'm making it out of carbon fiber and nomex honeycomb, I did the math and it'll come in around 300 pounds which is very light for such a huge structure. The Tesla has about the lowest center of gravity of any production car and I don't drive over 45mph so I'm not worried about crosswinds.
The two big aerodynamic concerns I have are:
1) how best to shape it (if it were 40-feet long, it would be easy to shape it like a killer whale with standing room in the middle and a narrower sleeping area in back, but 20 feet with a standing-height requirement makes it really hard to keep the drag coefficient down and still be practical
2) how much of a gap I should have between the floor of the camper and the roof of the car. If there's little gap, I'm worried the frontal area will act like a scoop and totally mess up the aerodynamics of both. The Tesla is 4.7 feet high and I would need to keep everything under 13.5 feet to be street legal.
I tried modeling everything in "Autodesk Flow Design" which is a 3D wind tunnel simulator but I'm not convinced it is giving me Cd values that are anywhere near accurate.
|
I don't think you'll have proper forwards/upper vision to see traffic lights while stopped at intersections.The sight line will be occulted by the overhang.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-05-2016, 05:36 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
That's what autonomous mode is for.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
|