12-28-2013, 10:35 AM
|
#121 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
|
Yes, but he was testing MPG, not noise or anything else, that is the important thing, especially when claiming %31 increase in mpg. I don't know why you think he is the one being dishonest. If different fuel makes your product go from %31 to %1.95....
Last edited by P-hack; 12-28-2013 at 11:02 AM..
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
12-28-2013, 11:12 AM
|
#122 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
|
and again with all the "oil sticks to the diamonds" stuff, pure speculation, indeed I believe that you have not validated that diamonds even get embedded in a running engine except as speculation.
|
|
|
|
|
12-28-2013, 12:04 PM
|
#123 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 39
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
What kind of question is that, your saying that I am dishonest because he falsified the report. It proved that more mileage was required for the original large gains in fuel economy to show up, the effect is not instantaneous as testing revealed. One of your own got 30% from the Silver treatment.
You can misquote me all you want, and I am sure you will keep doing it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack
Yes, but he was testing MPG, not noise or anything else, that is the important thing, especially when claiming %31 increase in mpg. I don't know why you think he is the one being dishonest. If different fuel makes your product go from %31 to %1.95....
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-28-2013, 12:11 PM
|
#124 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
|
When snake oil fails it is never the products fault. It is always user error.
|
|
|
|
|
12-28-2013, 12:12 PM
|
#125 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 39
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
OMG, you call basic science - speculation?
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack
and again with all the "oil sticks to the diamonds" stuff, pure speculation, indeed I believe that you have not validated that diamonds even get embedded in a running engine except as speculation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-28-2013, 12:27 PM
|
#126 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
|
I've not seen how you validated these things, or why you think lower noise = %31 mpg improvement. You avoid the question instead of saying "here is my proof".
|
|
|
|
|
12-28-2013, 01:54 PM
|
#127 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 39
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The beating jogged my memory about WHY the experts needed more fuel. The MPG rose too much between later runs and it was out of the allowable increase between runs. The test was formulated around known materials and not one that required break in over longer periods.
P, who do you work for, Mobil, Timkin, maybe both?
Its been a slice, but I Gotta Jet amigos.
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack
I've not seen how you validated these things, or why you think lower noise = %31 mpg improvement. You avoid the question instead of saying "here is my proof".
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-28-2013, 02:00 PM
|
#128 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
|
Lol, the MPG rose, so they needed more fuel, you are a hoot! And using pump gas instead of dyno gas explains everything...
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2013, 04:10 PM
|
#129 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,017
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
Tragicomic
What we have here is looking more and more like a snake oil salesman selling a legitimate product.
A 2% MPG gain is over $1000 per year for a semi truck. Fleet operators would jump at it if the product was priced appropriately.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2013, 04:57 PM
|
#130 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 39
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Maybe you know of a fleet that wants to try one SEMI kit for FREE?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler
Tragicomic
What we have here is looking more and more like a snake oil salesman selling a legitimate product.
A 2% MPG gain is over $1000 per year for a semi truck. Fleet operators would jump at it if the product was priced appropriately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
