Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hybrids
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-03-2012, 03:25 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurcher
 
mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Thanks: 151
Thanked 109 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pete c View Post
Yes, I do recall reading about that a few years back. Seemed like a very good idea. Did GM give up on it?
Hi pete c,
Over the last decade or so there has been an international effort to define a spec for stop-start with regeneration. The standard uses a 42 volt motor-generator, either belt driven or crakshaft, and 36 volt (nominal) batteries. Most car companies either have or are developing such systems. Parts companies Bosch, Continental (ISAD), Delphi, Denso, Gates (EMD), Siemens, Valeo (MArs), Visteon, ZF-Sachs Dynastart (ISG) and others have systems available now. Several cars have had start-stop without regeneration over the last 30 or so years. Building on those systems or starting fresh, Audi, BMW, Honda, Mazda, Mercedes, Toyota and Volvo have cars available this year or next. GM too, trucks for now. It seems like a relatively inexpensive change that provides about 7% improvement in the EPA urban cycle.
-mort

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-05-2012, 09:29 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 831
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
I agree, mort. it would seem to me that a higher voltage starter/alternator with regen/mild hybrid capabilities is a no brainer.

Most of the added cost would be in the battery and even that wouldn't be much if you didn't get carried away with battery capacity.

A more robust higher voltage alternator would cost a little more, but, eliminating the starter would recoup a good part of that.

Other savings in weight and material costs would result from smaller gauge wire used with higher voltage systems.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 10:38 PM   #13 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
Great. Then 12v batteries will phase out of the mainstream and cost a fortune.

I know: how about 500 lbs less extraneous electronic crap per vehicle?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 12:16 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 831
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Great. Then 12v batteries will phase out of the mainstream and cost a fortune.

I know: how about 500 lbs less extraneous electronic crap per vehicle?
i'm with ya, but, most americans ain't. they like their powered everything.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 12:12 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mort View Post
Hi pete c,
Over the last decade or so there has been an international effort to define a spec for stop-start with regeneration. The standard uses a 42 volt motor-generator, either belt driven or crakshaft, and 36 volt (nominal) batteries. Most car companies either have or are developing such systems. Parts companies Bosch, Continental (ISAD), Delphi, Denso, Gates (EMD), Siemens, Valeo (MArs), Visteon, ZF-Sachs Dynastart (ISG) and others have systems available now. Several cars have had start-stop without regeneration over the last 30 or so years. Building on those systems or starting fresh, Audi, BMW, Honda, Mazda, Mercedes, Toyota and Volvo have cars available this year or next. GM too, trucks for now. It seems like a relatively inexpensive change that provides about 7% improvement in the EPA urban cycle.
-mort
Is this to say 42V electrical systems will become standard soon? That would be nice... Another reason for this would be electrically driven superchargers and electrical turbine generators which would improve the efficiency of forced induction vehicles tremendously, which I think Subaru is trying to do?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 12:12 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WI
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sounds like the vues idea of being hybrid.
__________________
Sorry, new users are not permitted to post links in their signatures.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 12:52 PM   #17 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pete c View Post
the alternator ... recoup a little energy through regenerative braking.
This second idea in your OP has been discussed before. I was thinking of a three way switch when I first considered my alt cut-out: on, off, and braking were to be the three settings. I opted for a simple on/off because my knowledge is still too limited. I thought of the on/off as a baby step.

I am sure the alt would help braking, though very modestly.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 01:21 PM   #18 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,892

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 868 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
alternators make crappy electric motors.

starter motors are better, as are golf cart motors.
Aircraft motor generators are best.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2012, 01:23 PM   #19 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,892

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 868 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Great. Then 12v batteries will phase out of the mainstream and cost a fortune.

I know: how about 500 lbs less extraneous electronic crap per vehicle?
Yeah, instead of a 1500 watt fully illuminated computerized dash panel that can blow out why not use a fully featured mechanical one that uses little to no electricity?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 05:30 AM   #20 (permalink)
Simtronic
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 4
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Simtronic
1500w!

The modern dashboard uses a lot less power than you think, LED lighting and digital guages use mA the really old guages used heater wires and bymetalic strips to make the needle move. The best display you can get for power use is LCD that would use a couple of watts when lit by led lighting.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com