Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-03-2021, 10:00 AM   #41 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,061
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,111 Times in 980 Posts
Not a ram fancier, I do f250's. They are similar. There is generally this huge upflow of air beyween the cab and the bed, more noticeable with the cab high shell and it causes a wind wall. I put an inflatable seal on mine for a while and noticed a 5% efficiency gain until the SoCal desert sun destroyed it. When I had the turbo uppipes start leaking Co, I discovered everything in the tunnel entered the cab through the pressure flaps in the rear floor. There is a serious pressure gradient between the cab and bed.

__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-03-2021, 11:08 AM   #42 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 150
Thanks: 19
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko View Post
Not a ram fancier, I do f250's. They are similar. There is generally this huge upflow of air beyween the cab and the bed, more noticeable with the cab high shell and it causes a wind wall. I put an inflatable seal on mine for a while and noticed a 5% efficiency gain until the SoCal desert sun destroyed it. When I had the turbo uppipes start leaking Co, I discovered everything in the tunnel entered the cab through the pressure flaps in the rear floor. There is a serious pressure gradient between the cab and bed.
Thanks for the input! Just to confirm... that 5% gain with a the shell?

I bet the reason for the seal being on the bottom on the Rams was to keep the air clean for the vents on the back of the cab.

The up flow comment has me wondering now... how that flow interacts with the tonneau cover and the pressure it adds.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2021, 09:53 AM   #43 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,061
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,111 Times in 980 Posts
Yes it was using the shell because it is an aftermarket feature for people wanting non-hurricane access to the shell with both sets of windows open, probably with dogs in the bed.

You are now causing me the think one for the shell and one for the cab to bed junction would really be an interesting mod.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Piotrsko For This Useful Post:
steve05ram360 (08-04-2021)
Old 08-04-2021, 10:50 AM   #44 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 150
Thanks: 19
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Yeah conversation with others is awesome when it spawns ideas... This conversation had me thinking about that horizontal bed seal and your comment on the updraft between the bed & cab... going to do an experiment soon where I do a small area of the horizontal bed seal that is centered above the driveshaft. My thinking is since the whole seal increased downforce and adds drag, why not try to split the bubble on the tonneau cover with lack of the influence the seal provides. Kind of like a air driven splitter plate down the length of the tonneau towards the tailgate.

About a month back, before I installed the whole seal, went on a 300 mile road trip to grab the magnahelic gauges. Speeds were 65-75 with AC on the way back. That trip, I had a partial seal installed with duct tape before I arrived at the solution with the garage door seal. That tank gave an impressive 22.1 mpg and I was shocked it was so high. This has me thinking the shorter center seal might be an end solution to the bed seals.

I will update this thread if I find anything meaningful out of it.

Forgot to add... currently doing a "dont care" tank for about 400 miles commuting to/from work. Yesterday on the way home, traffic allowed for 70+ mph and I must say, the truck sure did feel "light" at those speeds, meaning the aero changes were definitely noticeable & there is definitely less drag.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com