Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-12-2009, 09:29 AM   #11 (permalink)
Renaissance Man
 
Formula413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Northeast dreaming of the Southwest
Posts: 596

Aegean C - '17 Honda Civic LX
90 day: 42.21 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
My question is does exhaust noise attract hot babes looking for action? Many seem to think so.
I am doing some long term testing of this theory in my Firebird.

When this has been discussed before I think the consensus was that freer flowing mufflers will only produce performance gains but not FE gains, since driving for FE generally involves using light throttle, and the increased airflow available from a performance muffler is not providing any benefit with the small amount of exhaust gas being generated. The best thing you can do with the exhaust for FE is optimizing the diameter of the pipe for the power being produced IMO. Too large a pipe will hurt velocity.

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-12-2009, 12:11 PM   #12 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Formula413 View Post
I am doing some long term testing of this theory in my Firebird.
bwaa ha ha hyuk hyuk hyuk
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 05:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
Exhaust Basics

I had the same questions with respect to exhaust, flow, and FE.

The best rule of thumb to use: "Stock is Best". It was finely tuned by experts -- any change in that system will effect the bottom line. Quiet is good.

Here are some great links on the Science and myths of Exhaust, by Team-Integra.net:

Exhaust Basics
Advanced Exhaust Tech I
Advanced Exhaust Tech II

RH77
__________________
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 10:08 PM   #14 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
I've heard conflicting things over the years. If no ECU modifications are made, will a car get better FE with reduced exhaust backpressure? Is backpressure ever desirable?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 10:21 PM   #15 (permalink)
Renaissance Man
 
Formula413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Northeast dreaming of the Southwest
Posts: 596

Aegean C - '17 Honda Civic LX
90 day: 42.21 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
I've heard conflicting things over the years. If no ECU modifications are made, will a car get better FE with reduced exhaust backpressure? Is backpressure ever desirable?
My understanding is that no, it is not. I read an article once about someone who put a butterfly valve into an exhaust pipe and set out to determine what was an optimal amount of back pressure for different engine loads, with the goal of using the butterfly to create the right amount of backpressure. Turns out that no extra backpressure was helpful at any engine load.

Another theory I heard was that an exhaust pipe that is too large in diameter for the application will actually allow atmospheric pressure to work against the engine. I have no idea if this is true or not.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 10:25 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 499
Thanks: 20
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
RH77,
thanks for the links to the articles.
They are a real find.

Cheers , Pete.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2009, 10:47 PM   #17 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Formula413 View Post
My understanding is that no, it is not. I read an article once about someone who put a butterfly valve into an exhaust pipe and set out to determine what was an optimal amount of back pressure for different engine loads, with the goal of using the butterfly to create the right amount of backpressure. Turns out that no extra backpressure was helpful at any engine load.

Another theory I heard was that an exhaust pipe that is too large in diameter for the application will actually allow atmospheric pressure to work against the engine. I have no idea if this is true or not.
Yes, it is. The exhaust must combat atmospheric pressure to exit the pipe. When it comes out of the engine, it's obviously under more than atmospheric pressure. As it goes through the exhaust, it slows, cools, and loses pressure.

While back pressure is absolutely not necessary, under any circumstances, exhaust diameter and length are necessarily tuned for optimum specifications.

I can't remember the formulae, or where I wrote them down, but there are some equations that will let you determine the optimum size/length of pipe based on VE (or a number representing exhaust flow as volume).

You basically want to fill the pipe, but not create more pressure than what is coming from the engine's exhaust pulse. You want the exhaust gasses to stay hot as possible, for as long as possible, so they're forced to exit the pipe as quickly as possible, which creates a scavenging pulse at the valve, helping to suck in more air, or reduce pumping losses.

I once tried the backpressure thing, but for a different reason: I was attempting to make an auto-tuning exhaust.

I originally theorized, that based on engine vacuum (which approximates load) a vacuum solenoid could open/close a section of the exhaust pipe just after the manifold collector to effectively "tune" the end of the manifold. No muffler or pipe was used after the collector, and the whole system failed to work as I determined it should, so I never bothered to try to dyno tune it.

I might still work on it some after I get rid of a few projects.

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel Economy related papers tasdrouille General Efficiency Discussion 41 03-19-2021 07:31 PM
smart cdi (diesel) owner from BC, Canada smartzuuk Introductions 29 09-06-2018 04:09 PM
mileage computer for a carbureted engine diesel_john Instrumentation 221 05-01-2014 11:38 PM
Project: Rebuilding an '01 Honda Insight as a nonhybrid Fabio Hybrids 158 01-12-2013 12:59 PM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 12:38 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com