12-18-2008, 03:48 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,279
Thanks: 24,401
Thanked 7,368 Times in 4,767 Posts
|
tires
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
Let's not forget that tire sizing is a factor in overall drive gearing, and might be a cheaper alternative than actually swapping gears in your vehicle, especially as a "test" setup, where the result might not be optimal.
|
Right! The issue of clutch-slipping at dead starts with manual transmission cars might defeat"life with taller tires",although it is sure an economical way to investigate gearing.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 04:44 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,532
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
The challenge in going to significantly taller tires is that they also raise the vehicle height, so you're changing 2 potentially important variables, even if you manage to hold width and rolling resistance constant.
|
|
|
12-18-2008, 05:31 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,279
Thanks: 24,401
Thanked 7,368 Times in 4,767 Posts
|
challenge
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
The challenge in going to significantly taller tires is that they also raise the vehicle height, so you're changing 2 potentially important variables, even if you manage to hold width and rolling resistance constant.
|
Yep,I don't want to even go there.I mentioned elsewhere to some member that I'd have to change the shackles or re-arc the leaf-springs to restore original ride-height,and then I'd still lose all kinds of clearance inside the wheel house.I wouldn't be able to climb grades without down-shifting,acceleration on freeway on-ramps would suffer,"passing" would be an issue,it just goes on and on!------------------ The Tremec 6-spd trans is something I'll think about.-------------- An engine swap is intellectually a delicious thing to think about also,although intimidating, considering the truck is daily-driver and used in construction/work/income.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
04-23-2009, 11:09 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 491
Thanks: 170
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
|
Great thread. Sure helped get my thinking back on track after being led well into the wilderness by another well meaning soul. Thanks Aerohead for the great summary in post #19 - ironic since it was post #19 from another site which led me off track in the first place ;-)
|
|
|
04-23-2009, 01:56 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carmel, IN
Posts: 61
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
When adding larger tires, remember to change the gears for the speedometer and odometer. I got three speeding tickets in 2000 within two months after going to one size larger tires because it through my speedometer off by 5 mph (e.g. 74 mph on speedometer =79mph shown on last ticket). I assume this would also throw off the odometer (1 mile could = 1.1 miles).
|
|
|
04-23-2009, 03:17 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 572
Thanks: 110
Thanked 123 Times in 71 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwkayaker
When adding larger tires, remember to change the gears for the speedometer and odometer. I got three speeding tickets in 2000 within two months after going to one size larger tires because it through my speedometer off by 5 mph (e.g. 74 mph on speedometer =79mph shown on last ticket). I assume this would also throw off the odometer (1 mile could = 1.1 miles).
|
Yes, at least it does on mine. I am running 155/80/R13 (instead of the 155/70/R13 recommended since they are no longer easy to find) and my speedometer and odometer are both off. On my drive into work this morning the GPS said I traveled 14.08 miles, the odometer said 13.3. Over a 350+ mile trip the GPS and ODO were off by about 5.6%.
__________________
|
|
|
04-23-2009, 09:06 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
|
MazdaMatt noted:
“…Lower TP at the same RPM puts your engine in a less efficient point on the BSFC chart?”
Big Dave comments:
Absolutely true for an Otto-cycle engine. Maybe not true for a diesel. Diesels do not have throttles and hence have flat torque curves and very large BSFC ”islands.”
Even with a gas engine, sometimes the loss of BSFC is less than the overall fuel burn rate so you still get an improvement in MPG, just not as much as the proportional reduction in drag would indicate.
This increase in BSFC is the nugget of truth in the old urban legend of driving at higher RPMs gives better MPG.
If you can achieve a reduction in CdA, then the correct follow-up is to re-gear to keep yourself in an efficient range at the desired road speed.
As I keep saying, gearing is (like aerodynamic improvements) a powerful tool for the real seeker of MPG.
Larger diameter wheels/tires are counter-productive and by no means a substitute for changing gearing. Larger diameter wheels add heights and frontal area and worse yet, add rotational inertia. If bigger wheels improved MPG, then all the "Bigfoot-Wannabe" lifted trucks should get terrific MPG.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
|
|
|
04-27-2009, 12:21 AM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave
Larger diameter wheels/tires are counter-productive and by no means a substitute for changing gearing. Larger diameter wheels add heights and frontal area and worse yet, add rotational inertia. If bigger wheels improved MPG, then all the "Bigfoot-Wannabe" lifted trucks should get terrific MPG.
|
I agree that increased rotational inertia and "in general" larger diameter tires will be counter-productive (for fuel economy), but I wonder if the effect is reduced on a vehicle with a taller ride height.
For example, a 4wd pick up truck has a tall ride height. So I speculate that on a truck with aero mods, increasing the tire diameter slightly (and possibly reducing the tread width), may bring the BSFC back into an efficient island; without significantly increasing the aero due to ride height increase, as there is already so much air traveling under the vehicle in its stock configuration.
Getting down to this level of detail, the amount of rolling resistance a particular set of tires produced would also have an impact. So, some educated tire shopping would be required.
Last edited by thndriia; 04-27-2009 at 04:27 PM..
|
|
|
04-27-2009, 09:53 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,096
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
thndriia... you goofed your quote. I never said that.
|
|
|
04-27-2009, 04:26 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
My apologies. That was my first post on this forum, so I'm still working out the details.
|
|
|
|