02-11-2009, 08:56 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Really? I was at TeamSwift yesterday re-reading your head-shave reports, and they seemed positive to me! You should go back and update that thread. :P
The pinging's no huge surprise, but I'd like to hear about the "general trouble".
You took Mike's advice and went for the .040 reduction, right? If you could put some back, would you? Or would you only go right back to stock?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-11-2009, 09:02 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
Well, .040 is a lot to take off a head. I took .025 off my Paseo's head and I got no problems at all. If I knew what I know now about head design I'd go a bit further.
|
|
|
02-11-2009, 10:20 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Tim, are you running timing advance too with that shaved head? All on regular gas?
Kind of straying from the topic of piston ring-ectomy, but whatever.
|
|
|
02-12-2009, 03:00 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
nut
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southen West Virginia
Posts: 654
Thanks: 0
Thanked 37 Times in 26 Posts
|
I would say most of the gain I got was from fixing the burnt valve and doing a mild porting and polishing of the head. After running with the audio knock sensor for a while after doing it I pretty much figured that shaving the head caused more tuning issues than the gain it gave me. It will also take a lot of your bottom end power away and make it suck under 1500rpms if you want to keep the knock halfway under control.
With a stock computer and no knock sensor it might not be apparent but I bet the engine won't last as long with a shaved head. It would have a much higher chance of bottom end failure from the knock. I would guess 75-100k miles. My setup has a pretty good bit of information available to help tune out the knock and even with 93 octane it cant take more than 1/4 throttle under 2000rpm. That was with the timing at -10 degrees so it is mainly compression causing the knock and not spark timing. 020 might be ok to try but really with a year of messing with a shaved head I am pretty much ready to give up on it. Unless I can get a reliable water injection system working then I will want to shave a bit more off
|
|
|
02-12-2009, 03:40 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Burn E85 in it
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 12:27 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805
Thanks: 91
Thanked 460 Times in 328 Posts
|
I think that you want a special ring with overlapping ends if you are only going to use one.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 12:31 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
You mean gapless pison rings.
Total Seal Rings Top-End Performance
Another fun idea is getting the piston skirts coated with anti-friction material, and the tops with ceramic. I don't think anyone has done it for mileage and documented the results.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 12:45 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
The Paseo uses a distributorless ignition system. There is no easy way to alter ignition timing as the computer handles it completely. I just let the computer advance it as much as it feels it should. It is possible that it retarded timing a bit when I shaved the head. I unfortunately have no way of knowing for sure.
|
|
|
02-16-2009, 04:57 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nashotah, WI
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
OK, so the obvious question: why didn't you do it on the racing motors as well?
|
See the post below
__________________
"The Stone Age did not come to an end because we had a lack of stones, and the oil age will not come to an end because we have a lack of oil" ; His Excellency Sheikh Ahmed Zaki Yamani (Saudi Arabia Oil Minister from 1962 to 1986)
https://ecomodder.com/forum/em-fuel-...ehicleid=10608
|
|
|
02-16-2009, 04:59 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nashotah, WI
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by guudasitgets
you can either collapse the second ring or leave it out. We did this on qualifying motors where we didn't want as much drag on internal parts, racing oil filters are another trick (i.e. NASCAR restrictor plate tracks, less filter media to push through, less horsepower)loss
|
see bold type
__________________
"The Stone Age did not come to an end because we had a lack of stones, and the oil age will not come to an end because we have a lack of oil" ; His Excellency Sheikh Ahmed Zaki Yamani (Saudi Arabia Oil Minister from 1962 to 1986)
https://ecomodder.com/forum/em-fuel-...ehicleid=10608
|
|
|
|