Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-27-2010, 06:01 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hondata tuning for 2005 Civic Si - worth it?

I have a 2005 Si.

I have a really good performance shop right down the road.

I went in today and asked about modding the car for better fuel economy and the guy knew exactly what I was talking about.

They suggested doing the Hondata K-series ECU refresh with economy settings.

The one time flash would run $295, which isn't too bad at all if it works, plus around $150 to install a cold air intake. Right now I average on my longer trips around 29 Mpg driving between 65 and 80.

Has anyone else out there done this mod? Anyone have any actual results from tuning their EP3 Si?

Thanks!

Ben

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-27-2010, 07:40 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Offhand, I'd say that it's not worth it.

In general, FE mods just from changing the "programming" in your car's computer will not be that large. It needs to run right around a specific air-to-fuel ratio (14.7:1) to keep the catalytic converter working, and the ECU in the car is set up to do just that. You can potentially cut down on some things (in general, that cuts into whatever "safety margins" the factory built in) but the gains will likely be small.

The cold-air intake will not help your FE. In fact, there's a decent chance it will reduce it! Most engines are more efficient when they are pulling in warm air, though there is definitely a point at which it gets "too warm". In the winter, it can be better to pull air from right next to the exhaust manifold!! Search "warm air intake" on here for examples and discussions of why.

I'm thinking that the pay-back on the $300 re-flash will be on the order of many years, unless fuel prices go through the roof. If they do, and if it really does improve your mileage, it might pay itself back eventually.

How you drive has a larger effect on your mileage than computer chips or air intakes. Read up on "eco-driving" or "hypermiling" to see the hows and whys. I've gone from 30 MPG to 47-48 MPG in my CRX Si, which is more than you'll see from any mod.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2010, 07:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 29

cycleguy_GEO - '94 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 43.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
That is actually a pretty good price for the K-Series re-flash. Back when I bought my 2002 Civic Si the cheapest option was like $800 and they didn't have any real good maps for it so you had to figure it out on your own. On one side, I would say 'go for it' but then again I think it is funny to de-tune a car designed to be sporty. I got about 30mpg in my Civic when I drove it (right now it is in the garage getting a very slow valve adjustment as I have time available). I imagine you would have to pay for another re-flash if you were unhappy with the performance of the car so maybe you should either buy the full K-PRO setup or just leave the computer alone.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2010, 08:08 PM   #4 (permalink)
cmj
Team Honda
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greenwood
Posts: 39

Honda - '96 Honda Civic EX
90 day: 36.12 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've successfully and SAFELY tuned my vehicle to ~9mpg better simply by getting rid of excess fuel under 20% load. As far as catalytic converters, I dont know. An "economy" flash isn't necessary going to be specific to your vehicle tho. If you are interested in tuning as a hobby, buy a hondata setup, get a wideband, and READ READ READ, if you're interested in picking up 2-3mpg on a lightened generalized fuel map, go for it. If 2-3 mpg isn't worth 300 to you, I would just work on the driver mod. I picked up about 6mpg on this mod alone.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2010, 08:45 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sarguy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 468

Mazda5 - '12 Mazda 5
90 day: 25.22 mpg (US)

Big D - '11 Dodge Durango Crew
90 day: 18.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 86
Thanked 87 Times in 54 Posts
bartine, is this shop going to use a canned tune or are they actually going to put your car on a dyno and then tune it?

If they aren't going to dyno it, I would not bother. I think you could see gains in mpg, but only if your car was dyno'd. Every car is different even though they could be the same exact model. Canned tunes are usually a good starting point.

Like mentioned, the gain could be really small and not worth it. If they dyno tune it, the price may increase.

Like cmj wrote, mod the driver first.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2010, 08:59 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
And by "Mod the driver" - we are talking about me - correct?

I drive a bit of miles for work - business trips from Atlanta to Washington DC.

I have read that the K20A3 can be tuned for high efficiency, but haven't found a lot of details yet.

I'm hoping that others who have had a K20A3 engine can chime in.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2010, 09:04 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sarguy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 468

Mazda5 - '12 Mazda 5
90 day: 25.22 mpg (US)

Big D - '11 Dodge Durango Crew
90 day: 18.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 86
Thanked 87 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bartine View Post
And by "Mod the driver" - we are talking about me - correct?

I drive a bit of miles for work - business trips from Atlanta to Washington DC.

I have read that the K20A3 can be tuned for high efficiency, but haven't found a lot of details yet.

I'm hoping that others who have had a K20A3 engine can chime in.
You got it!

I would suggest a Scangauge II. I got one on Ebay for 130$. I have used it on 3 cars now and it has paid for itself. It will be like a little girlfriend/(boyfriend? - trying to be politically correct...) that will nag you to keep your foot off of the right pedal, among other things.

I would still put the tune off for a while.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2010, 09:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Bartine, for that kind of driving, your greatest disadvantage is the overall final drive ratio of your performance Honda.

Both my old VX (now sold) and my current 2008 Altima Coupe ran Fairly low RPM at higher sustained speeds.

when you can go 72 MPH at 22-2400 RPM the engine has a fairly low but decent load and efficiency is greater.

Most of the performance Hondas have gearing that would have the RPM ranging from 3200-3600 and even higher at speeds above 70 MPH, which is less load and lower efficiency.

My old 76 280Z, built for performance had a .75 5th gear overdrive, and originally had a 3.54 rear axle ratio. It worked out to about 85 MPH, at 3000 RPM in high gear with a 5 speed out of an 82 ZX. I later changed it to a 3.90 which helped performance but cost me some MPG, which at that time (15 years ago) was not the priority it is today.

It was a best of both worlds compromise, with 30-60-90-120 max speeds in 1-4th gears, while 5th added 33% to the 4th gear top speed. In reality it probably would not go any faster in 5th than in 4th, but the low RPM high speed cruising capability was good for close to 30 MPG as long as you kept the speeds close to the 65 limit in Va.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2010, 10:03 PM   #9 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,594

RippinRoo - '05 Subaru Legacy Wagon 2.5 GT
Subaru
90 day: 21.16 mpg (US)

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 53.91 mpg (US)

Olga - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon
90 day: 46.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 303
Thanked 311 Times in 186 Posts
Definitely agree with SoD and sarguy... for less than the cold air intake, get a ScanGauge II and use that to improve your eco-driving skills... it's incredible the difference it makes to get that instant feedback!!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
90 Civic Dx motor vs. Si motor for daily driving vs. 96 CX sevenspeed General Efficiency Discussion 13 08-27-2010 02:40 PM
1986 Honda Civic Hatchback Si - What can I do? rwyler EcoModding Central 12 03-23-2010 12:34 PM
Civic Si from NY drew1d Introductions 6 11-03-2009 11:30 PM
04 Civic Si - New member from Minnesota greenwar Introductions 16 11-28-2008 12:49 PM
HILARIOUS!!! Civic Si For sale DifferentPointofView For Sale 9 04-05-2008 11:31 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com