Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-13-2010, 06:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jackson, WY
Posts: 67

Odd - '04 Ford Ranger
90 day: 33.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Effects of Headlights on mpg: 6%?

This guy claims you can generally save around 6% of gas by not having your lights on. If true, I think using LED lights, and taking off the AC and/or alternator would really make a huge difference. I don't really see many ecomodders here reporting about this move so I'm curious what the thoughts are about this. Also, have people figured out the drag of having all your windows down vs. up? I don't have a scan-guage to do this and don't want to waste a tank trying.

Is the alternator always running and being a drain, or is it on an as needed basis?

Driving with your Headlights On

Also, better to use the windows down to cool off or a fan? Does the fan drain the FE or is it going anyway?


Last edited by cons; 08-13-2010 at 06:38 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-13-2010, 07:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
The corner lights and dash lights draw about 90W, and headlights draw 110W according to my own measurements. For a 50% efficient alternator, that's an additional 400W (0.5HP) at the crank.

I've run the numbers through our calculator for a hypothetical Honda Insight in which someone installed a 50% efficient alternator. This car has a larger than typical percentage MPG hit when turning on the headlights, because it spends relatively little energy on aerodynamic drag and rolling resistance.

With a 200W electrical load (ECU, fuel pump, etc.) creating a 400W load at the crank, you'd get about 70.13mpg @ 65mph. Turn on the lights, and you get 67.10mpg @ 65mph. 4% difference.

Lights off
Lights on

The percentage difference in a Ranger is much, much smaller, but the fact that you save about 0.04gal/hour is constant. No matter what you're driving, you can save the same amount of fuel by turning off unneeded 12V loads.

Windows up, fans on is much more efficient in my car than windows down, fans off.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2010, 07:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
tumnasgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wellington, NZ
Posts: 158

The Charger - '15 BMW i3
Thanks: 81
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
I use my lights all the time, with the theory that if people see me better, they are less likely to pull out in front of me (especially in winter here, there are so many shadows it's easy to miss a car without lights), saving me from slamming on the brakes.

I have considered getting LED DRLs, but when I last looked, they are about $150-250US for a brand name set, and I don't drive all that much, so the payback time would be quite long.
LED bulbs are fine for things like taillights and position markers, but for headlights they just aren't bright enough (with some special exceptions). Some new cars have LED dipped-beams, but you can't retrofit them to cars easily as the beam from LEDs isn't the same as a halogen's.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2010, 07:59 PM   #4 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
cons -

I disabled my DRL's because they were drawing maybe 10 Amps (10 Amps*12 Volts = 120 Watts) minimum for both headlight bulbs. In my Saturn S-Series, my DRLs are my high-beams (running at lower Amps?!?!?!). I delay using my headlights. At sunset I have my driving lights on, which are about 80% LED at this point.

I also have other ways of "being seen" and I categorically recommend MetroMPG's safety thread :

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ded-13781.html

I especially recommend post #12 :

Quote:
3) Extra communication with following drivers: when warranted, repeatedly flash your brake lights, or turn on your 4-ways - I always do this on the freeway when I spot a significant slowdown ahead. This applies when stopping or already stopped.

(Some Mercedes cars automatically activate a special high-intensity - possibly flashing, I'm not sure - brake lights when the driver brakes harder than usual.)
I pretty much do this anytime I see bad stuff up ahead and/or I am reacting to an emergency situation. It sometimes makes my passengers nervous, but I explain and they understand my intentions.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 04:30 AM   #5 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
I have xenon headlights and like others run with them on full time except in sunny weather as only the blind it seems are allowed to drive in Edinburgh

I haven't noticed any significant drag on using them vs not in summer when it isn't raining. My engine has a pretty heavy flywheel though so I don't think the load of the lights makes much difference.

My SG2 LOD and GPH do not change at idle lights on or off.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 07:12 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
alvaro84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fehérvárcsurgó, Hungary
Posts: 384

Teresa - '04 BMW F650CS
Motorcycle
90 day: 80.53 mpg (US)

The YARDIS - '99 Toyota Yaris 1.0
90 day: 59.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
I can't turn Teresa's low-beam light off (constant 55W load) - because of regulations the light just doesn't have a switch (AFAIK lighting on motorcycles is compulsory in Europe, every time) - but I think I normally would seldom turn it off anyway. According to my experience I'm practically invisible without it
It would be nice to see a LED replacement for H3 halogene though - something that's at least as bright as the incandescent version (and lights the same angle - though it depends on the optics of the headlight too).
My backlight and instrument panel lights are already replaced with LEDs.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 07:29 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
basjoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,088

Aerocivic - '92 Honda Civic CX
Last 3: 70.54 mpg (US)

AerocivicLB - '92 Honda Civic CX
Team Honda
90 day: 55.14 mpg (US)

Camryglide - '20 Toyota Camry hybrid LE
90 day: 65.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 677 Times in 302 Posts
On the aerocivic, turning on the headlights knocks the mileage down by 2 to 3 mpg. On the F150, lights on or off has no noticable effect on mileage.

On the aerocivic at any speed over 30mph, windows closed/fan on nets better mileage than windows open/fan off. On the F150, the mileage effects of windows open/closed or fan on/off is unnoticeable above the high levels of background drag.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 08:20 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cons View Post
This guy claims you can generally save around 6% of gas by not having your lights on.
Though there will be a minor power drain from using the headlights, I've never noticed any perceptible difference in FE with or without having my headlights on (either as DRL of as normal lights).

I had Volvo's always-on set-up changed to be able to switch the headlights off, but not because of FE reasons

Quote:
If true, I think using LED lights
Nothing else should really be used for DRL.

LEDs draw a lot less power, and being smaller they're sufficiently different from regular headlights to minimize the risk of other road users being rendered nearly invisible near cars with them on.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alvaro84 View Post
I can't turn Teresa's low-beam light off (constant 55W load) - because of regulations the light just doesn't have a switch (AFAIK lighting on motorcycles is compulsory in Europe, every time) - but I think I normally would seldom turn it off anyway. According to my experience I'm practically invisible without it
AFAIK only in the UK it's not mandatory to have your headlight on on a m/c .

Don't turn it off for FE reasons on a m/c.
It's bad enough with the headlight on, no need to make it even more dangerous.

If it's allowed where you live, try out a yellow light.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 09:04 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
alvaro84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fehérvárcsurgó, Hungary
Posts: 384

Teresa - '04 BMW F650CS
Motorcycle
90 day: 80.53 mpg (US)

The YARDIS - '99 Toyota Yaris 1.0
90 day: 59.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Oh, I thought it is compulsory everywhere in the EU, because it is in Hungary and the Germans made Teresa this way. I was wrong then.
No, I don't turn it off (I can't do it to begin with) - but it went out once, riding on the main road 4 of Hungary (2 lanes with pretty heavy traffic). And yes, it was pretty dangerous, several drivers started overtaking heading towards me in my lane, sometimes I had to flee to the (paved, thankfully) shoulder of the road. I replaced the bulb immediately when I got what was wrong. (There's no law to carry spare bulbs anymore here, yet I do - and I don't regret it...) Especially that we got home at night, so having a lowbeam was crucial...
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2010, 09:07 AM   #10 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
An alternator delete will reduce electrical loads completely. You of course are still using power that you have to pay for at the wall, but at least its not coming from oil.

__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
101.5 MPG on my 2003 Ninja 250!!! theycallmeebryan Motorcycles / Scooters 308 01-06-2016 02:56 AM
free OBD2 software with MPG calc whitewiz Instrumentation 11 12-10-2014 11:53 AM
Project: Rebuilding an '01 Honda Insight as a nonhybrid Fabio Hybrids 158 01-12-2013 12:59 PM
SGII first observations! gone-ot Success Stories 10 04-02-2010 02:26 AM
mpguino acted up today, lost mpg during fuel cut wagonman76 OpenGauge / MPGuino FE computer 9 06-17-2009 01:25 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com