Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-29-2014, 07:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
kgwedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Eden Texas
Posts: 37

Atos - '05 Hyundai Atos Prime AT
90 day: 21.33 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Engine Off Coasting Experiment

I decided to do some testing to find a numerical value for the fuel savings between Engine Off Coasting (eOFFc), and Engine On Coasting (eONc).

On my normal routes, my Metro gets close to 58 MPG. I drive slow, and have the advantage of good breakdown lanes that I drive in. Traffic is seldom a factor on this route. My normal commute is 66.4 miles round trip. I maximize the use of "pulse and glide" ( "accelerate and coast" ).

Of the eco mods done to my Metro, the button on the gearshift that opens the power circuit to the fuel injector is my best eco mod. I accelerate to an optimum speed (depending on terrain) then push in the clutch, push the button on the gearshift until the engine stops. If it will be a long coast, I'll put it in neutral, otherwise just use the clutch. To restart I just pop the clutch (usually in 5th gear).

I decided to use timers ( like a chess timer) to see how long my engine ran, versus how long it was off. One leg of my trip is 33.2 miles. This section is basically level, with a slight tail wind, and about a 150ft decrease in altitude.

The 33.2 miles took 46 min 32 sec. That is an average speed of 42.8 MPH. I try to accelerate to about 55mph and then coast to about 35mph. This varies with terrain. Total fuel burn was .56 GAL.

During this 46 minutes, my engine was off for 1256 sec (20min 56sec) and on for 1535 (25min 35sec).
At idle my Metro burns .13 GPH.

1256 seconds is .349 hours. So I saved .13 GPH for .349 HRS. Which is equivalent to .04537 GAL.
Since total fuel burned was .56 gal, the fuel saved was 8.1%
If I had used eONc then I would have burned .605 GAL in total.
I didn't know if I should have used percent of fuel NOT burned (i.e.. saved) or percent of total fuel used, that could have been saved..( I got confused ) :-)

Here is a quick algorithm check:
An average of 60 MPH, for 1 Hour, using 1Gal of gas.
That is an average of 60 MPG. Engine off 50% of the time.
Fuel saved = .13 GPH for .5 HR = .065 GAL.
That's a 6.5% fuel savings. So my figures are in the ballpark.

A long uphill or a long downhill would drastically change the percentages. For my own use, I'll plan on between 6 and 10% MPG improvement using eOFFc versus eONc.
The lower the total drag, the longer the coast. Better aerodynamics, and lower rolling resistance will increase the benefits gained by eOFFc versus eONc.

I can expect a fuel savings of about .1 gal a day if I use eOFFc instead of eONc. That is about 35c a day in gas savings. Or $7.00 a month.

__________________







  Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to kgwedi For This Useful Post:
Joggernot (07-30-2014), MetroMPG (07-30-2014), redpoint5 (07-30-2014), sarguy01 (07-30-2014), user removed (07-29-2014)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-29-2014, 07:30 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
13% of the fuel consumed in the USA is wasted idling. Sounds like you are at half that even on the highway with no idling stopped.

Nice math and good information.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
Fat Charlie (07-30-2014)
Old 07-30-2014, 09:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Idling while gliding burns less fuel than anything except engine braking, which is less efficient. You get points for casually calling that gas "wasted."
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2014, 11:27 AM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgwedi View Post
I drive slow, and have the advantage of good breakdown lanes that I drive in.
Question: what's a "breakdown lane"? That's not a term used around here.

I did a similar test in my local sub/urban driving to look at the difference between EonC and EoffC. The difference was 12.9% then, which you would expect in that driving environment.

Coasting experiment: engine off VS. engine idling - MetroMPG.com
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2014, 12:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
kgwedi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Eden Texas
Posts: 37

Atos - '05 Hyundai Atos Prime AT
90 day: 21.33 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
MetroMPG,
A breakdown lane is a South African term. I don't know what you would call it in the US or Canada.
It is a full width lane to the right of the normal driving lane. Used if you get a flat or something. In Texas and Florida we pull over into them to allow faster traffic to pass. They are bound by a solid white line. Great for cycling or hypermiling. :-)
Your 12.5% should be accurate, because you have a very efficient car. If you had zero drag, then theoretically you could coast forever.
I tried pulse/glide with my RV and it was just dumb. Accelerating was hard, and drag was huge, so coasting was very short. I'm guessing that less than 10% of my time could be coasting with my RV, but close to 50% with my Metro. Your Metro is even be better.
__________________







  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kgwedi For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (07-30-2014)
Old 07-30-2014, 12:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgwedi View Post
MetroMPG,
A breakdown lane is a South African term. I don't know what you would call it in the US or Canada.
It is a full width lane to the right of the normal driving lane. Used if you get a flat or something.
Aha! "Paved shoulder".

Unfortunately not legal to drive in them in Ontario anyway, though in some parts of the province I have seen them used the way you describe (some slower vehicles will move into them periodically to let faster traffic pass).
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2014, 12:56 PM   #7 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgwedi View Post
Your 12.5% should be accurate, because you have a very efficient car.
I think the difference might have more to do with the city route used for my comparison vs. your higway route.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2014, 01:36 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
cowmeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,658

Princess Carriage - '20 Ford Explorer Limited

Silver - '22 Ford Maverick Hybrid XLT w/tow pkg
Maverick Hybrids
90 day: 41.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 128
Thanked 763 Times in 460 Posts
Wow, your commute is a little longer than mine, but the description of your drive, along with the on/off times and speeds, is pretty much word for word (other than the kill switch) how I'd describe my drive.
I will bump start all the way down to about 5 mph in fifth, plus I always key off at every upcoming light in case it turns while I'm coasting up to it

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
engine off coasting

Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com