Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2016, 02:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Engine piston geometry change had good results.

I am reworking my engine again and decided to go with a more complicated style quench/reverse step piston to improve detonation resistance and it seemed to have had a nice affect on the mpg.

Went from 10.3 mpg on winter gas to about 16.7, not exactly sure if the change was only from that or from the other things that were changed but regardless the mpg is doing much better now when my foot is out of it.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-06-2016, 09:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Why did it need reworking "again"?

Best reason for mileage increase was better compression. Piston design could help it work with higher compression?

regards
mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2016, 04:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
I lowered the compression about a point to be able to use more boost and also like you said I picked pistons that are very detonation resistance with a design that has a much faster and more consistent flame front.

Also tried out total seal's gapless rings to eliminate blowby (for the most part).

Mostly did the work because I wanted to refine the engine a bit more, the VVT system was working a little too well (making the cam too small down low) so I adjusted the engine so it has more TQ output below 3k.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2016, 05:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,267

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
You don't really want total seal rings.
They are not recommended for street cars due to complaints about oil burning and consumption, the manufacturer and engine shops warn again using them on the street. It has been found that the total seal rings line back up and stay aligned on most of the engines cylinders by 30,000 miles.
I looked into using them in my 489 build and went with traditional file fit rings.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
Xist (03-08-2016)
Old 03-06-2016, 07:32 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
You don't really want total seal rings.
They are not recommended for street cars due to complaints about oil burning and consumption, the manufacturer and engine shops warn again using them on the street. It has been found that the total seal rings line back up and stay aligned on most of the engines cylinders by 30,000 miles.
I looked into using them in my 489 build and went with traditional file fit rings.
Ah.....well that's not a good thing. Crap.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2016, 06:56 AM   #6 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 214.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
You wouldn't happen to have a picture of these alternative-geometry pistons?
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2016, 06:56 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
You wouldn't happen to have a picture of these alternative-geometry pistons?
Yeah I think I should have one around here some where, it's a reverse step dished design by icon. I'll post it up in the afternoon.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2016, 06:03 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Here is a picture, it's kind of far away but you should get the general Idea. Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Striker2237 For This Useful Post:
MobilOne (03-12-2016)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com