Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-15-2009, 03:26 PM   #11 (permalink)
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...which: "...do you wanna EAT or do you wanna DRIVE?"

...especially if corn is the source. Brazil uses a "cultivated native weed" not a food-stock.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 10-15-2009, 04:05 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Safety Harbor, FL
Posts: 119

Lil Sulf - '94 Toyota Corolla
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...which: "...do you wanna EAT or do you wanna DRIVE?"

...especially if corn is the source. Brazil uses a "cultivated native weed" not a food-stock.
It's a little more complicated than that.
For the record, I think there should no subsidy for ethanol and it should not be mandated ever. If ethanol as a fuel can compete, let it. If it can't, let it die.
I usually hate the most pure forms of capitalism, but if ethanol can't compete on it's own, it needs to go away.

My limited research seems to think that burning ethanol to create electricity (hopefully to power cars) is a more effective way to cut emissions.

And that's without a Scangauge o.O
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2010, 10:14 PM   #13 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I wish gas was $4.199 again

the worst thing to happen to the movement toward a better way of making our wheels turn lost steam when gas dropped down to $1.99

When and why did this forum occur? When did fuel efficient vehicles really start to catch the public eye? When did more research toward making diesel more viable speed up? It's when oil hit triple digits for a barrel.

As long as gas remains dirt cheap, we'll always have difficulties getting the US off the gas addiction. Make gas expensive, and the oil lobbies will be less popular. Talk to people in Europe and the price for fuel is crazy high compared to us, and it's been that way for a while. The result? there are a ton more fuel efficient vehicles available over there than over here. I read the post from a guy in Belgium who mentioned he had a van with a 2L diesel engine. If you tried to sell that in the US you'd get laughed all the way back to Europe. 2L in a vehicle that large? You gotta be kidding me. But I bet that van does just fine.

I read reviews about my minivan posted when it was new, and it was criticized for lacking power and having too small of an engine. It has a 3L for crying out loud. As a society we're too accustomed to power power power POWER at any cost, and it's crazy. My 4L Explorer engine may not become the EV I had hoped for, but I promise it is going to get a smaller more efficient engine one way or another.
RIP Maxima 1997-2012

Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2010, 02:19 AM   #14 (permalink)
Allch Chcar's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Coast, California
Posts: 429

Cordelia - '15 Mazda Mazda3 i Sport
90 day: 37.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 34 Times in 25 Posts

In all actuality your 3L was probably underpowered compared to the amount of sophistication on Foreign small engines. The big 3 have been big on V8 for years and when it comes to sophistication the switch from OHV to DOHC and from Iron Blocks to Aluminum is all old technology but it's as modern as the American motor companies have been until the gasoline price spike. Maybe it was a lack of competition and the King of the Hill approach that has become American capitalism which seems to only degrade in competition, now is the time to start pointing out our past problems, hindsight is never 20/20 especially since the past is written by the Conquerors. Having driven a few minivans; a '96 Ford Windstar, '98 Olds Mobile Silhouette, '00 Toyota Sienna, and a GMC Safari. The most powerful? the Sienna with a two Dual overhead cam which is also the smallest displacement a 3.0L v6(all are v6 vans) and they all pretty much get the same MPG except for the Safari which is an AWD :P. Surely the Sienna is the newest one of the bunch but the domestics used the same engines with minor changes until the minivan market disappeared entirely.

A side story. The Sienna is owned by my grandma who's other car is a nonfunctional 92 Camaro. She apparently loves v8s but when she got a loaner Camry, while the Sienna was in for a clogged IAT $$$, it had a v6 and it scared her to death how fast it was . The 3.0l Toyota Sienna gets a whopping 200BHP 200ft-lbs of torque and in all truth is pretty fast when it's pushed especially when it's out of OD(automatic tranny fail) and even more so compared to my truck . It'd be hard for me to imagine 200+BHP in something 1000lbs lighter like a Camry. Her Sienna spins 2k RPM in OD at 55 and there's almost no lack of power till 60+mph despite the vehicle being very tall and fairly wide and 4k lbs.

This whole 4 cylinder, Ethanol, Turbocharged thing gets me thinking. Most Daily driven cars only need 10-20 hp if they aren't driven 70-80mph. But I've seen relatively "aero" compact/midsize cars need something in the order of 20HP to maintain 70mph and 30HP to maintain 80mph in the Focus,Civic,RX-8. Most 4 cylinder are designed to accommodate that kind of travel and so they spin 3k+ rpm in Overdrive at that speed. With Ethanol and turbocharging which are actually are more efficient when they are done together. With Gasoline, even premium grade, the AutoCompanies usually run the Air:Fuel mixture rich for Regular Naturally Air fed engines under any kind of moderate load or high RPM say 4k+. With Ethanol they might be able to run the mixture closer to Stoich with boosted air pressure, at a lower RPM, and still come out ahead of a V6. Turbo's work under load and that would mean even more fuel with Gasoline just to keep the engine cool whereas with Ethanol keeping too cool is usually the problem. Direct Injection helps make up some of the disadvantage Regular grade Gasoline has but Ethanol is still better in every way except range per gallon and price per BTU.

At least Ethanol is a buffer against high fuel prices slowing the Economy. When Gasoline hits $3 averages over the Summer there should be some recovery in the Ethanol market and you should know Gasoline would be more expensive if there was no Ethanol at all.

-Allch Chcar

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Ethanol Scam: Are ethanol advocates giving slanted mpg numbers? Ptero Fossil Fuel Free 15 04-22-2010 09:58 AM
[Article] Better Fuel Economy with Ethanol? SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 62 04-02-2010 11:31 AM
Vilsack: US Should boost Ethanol use AndrewJ General Efficiency Discussion 4 01-04-2010 09:27 PM
Getting Off Gas! bennelson Fossil Fuel Free 117 05-19-2009 12:36 PM
Ethanol kills grain food market WaxyChicken The Lounge 14 12-11-2008 10:07 PM

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com