Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob
I have some old reference books around, with a large selection of boiler styles for steam engines. They all specify either ten or twelve square feet of boiling area per HP. That's with ideal temperatures. Heat recovery schemes would need even larger hardware. To run a nicely refined, efficient steam engine you need most of the bits used in the Doble steam car. It was able to compete with the gas buggies in refinement and ease of use, but was very expensive. It is hardly worth the price of another complex engine for a few percent savings.
|
12sqft/hp good rule of thumb number to know. If we only want to run an alternator, 1hp should be good enough. So a simple single tube in tube boiler will be 30' long. Guess we need to think up a different heat exchanger setup.
Multiple tube's like in a classic boiler.
Maybe a heater core in the exhaust stream, however soot and corrosion would be a problem.
Small OD copper tubing coiled in the exhaust stream would be easy, however as mentioned earlier it would need to be coiled vertically to prevent the steam from getting trapped.
Yes the Idea of heat recovery adds the complexity of a second engine and at this point we are only looking for a few % return. But this Idea has huge potential for the future, it is definitely worth investigating and experimenting with. As I mentioned before an a/c system has all the major components of a Rankin cycle, in other words all the complexity of a second heat engine and the auto manufacturers have been able to economically add these system. So I don't think that it's unreasonable to make a heat recovery engine.